The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
801
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.51
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.04
802
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.9
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 2.03
803
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.95
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 2.03
804
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.7
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 2.03
805
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.02
806
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.25
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.02
807
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.6
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.02
808
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.95
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 2.02
809
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.71
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.02
810
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 136.94
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 2.02
811
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.01
812
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.01
813
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.33
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.01
814
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.4
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2
815
Age: 16
Average rating: 138.39
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2
816
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2
817
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.48
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2
818
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.48
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2
819
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.62
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2
820
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.63
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2
821
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.94
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 1.99
822
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 20.59
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.99
823
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.51
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.99
824
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.73
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.99
825
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.48
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.98
826
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.48
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.98
827
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 129.36
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 1.98
828
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.25
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.98
829
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 122.39
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 1.98
830
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.9
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.96
831
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 20.42
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.96
832
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.48
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.95
833
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.52
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.95
834
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 1.95
835
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 199.78
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 1.95
836
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 364.74
TTFR rankings: 710
Ratio Superior: 1.95
837
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.33
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.95
838
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 47.3
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.95
839
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.18
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.94
840
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.36
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.94
841
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.95
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.94
842
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.78
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.94
843
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.94
844
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 72.68
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 1.94
845
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.13
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 1.94
846
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.93
847
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.44
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.93
848
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.6
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.93
849
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.82
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.93
850
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.52
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.92
851
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.94
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 1.91
852
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.95
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 1.91
853
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.95
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 1.91
854
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.92
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.91
855
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.78
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.9
856
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.57
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.9
857
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 47.3
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.9
858
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 215.22
TTFR rankings: 409
Ratio Superior: 1.9
859
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.9
860
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.35
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.89
861
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.35
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.89
862
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.42
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.89
863
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 159.23
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 1.89
864
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 102.19
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.89
865
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.48
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.89
866
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.13
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.88
867
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 148.6
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 1.88
868
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 178.11
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 1.88
869
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.88
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.87
870
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.87
871
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.72
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.87
872
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 132.66
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 1.87
873
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.73
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.87
874
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.7
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.86
875
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.58
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.86
876
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 143.47
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 1.86
877
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 159.23
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 1.86
878
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.86
879
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.13
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 1.85
880
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.92
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 1.85
881
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.95
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.85
882
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 129.36
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 1.85
883
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.9
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.85
884
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.33
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.84
885
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.21
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.84
886
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.84
887
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.84
888
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.78
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.84
889
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.88
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 1.83
890
Age: 18
Average rating: 230.26
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 1.83
891
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.83
892
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.82
893
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.81
894
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.81
895
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.27
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.81
896
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 221.6
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 1.81
897
Age: 10
Average rating: 21
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.81
898
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.81
899
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 1.81
900
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 148.6
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 1.8

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников