The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
801
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.83
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.76
802
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 412.48
TTFR rankings: 1133
Ratio Superior: 2.75
803
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.89
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.74
804
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.04
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.74
805
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.96
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.74
806
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.56
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.73
807
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.7
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 2.73
808
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.66
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2.72
809
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.47
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 2.72
810
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.72
811
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 356.84
TTFR rankings: 968
Ratio Superior: 2.71
812
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.54
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.71
813
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.35
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.71
814
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 80.56
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 2.71
815
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.72
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.71
816
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 412.48
TTFR rankings: 1115
Ratio Superior: 2.7
817
Age: 7.7
Average rating: 5.19
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 2.7
818
Age: 13
Average rating: 45.65
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 2.69
819
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.69
820
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.05
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.69
821
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 218.45
TTFR rankings: 588
Ratio Superior: 2.69
822
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.71
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.68
823
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 142.48
TTFR rankings: 381
Ratio Superior: 2.67
824
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.15
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.66
825
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.47
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 2.66
826
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.56
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.66
827
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.92
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.66
828
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 412.48
TTFR rankings: 1096
Ratio Superior: 2.66
829
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.66
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 2.65
830
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 117.84
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 2.64
831
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.1
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.63
832
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 101.04
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 2.63
833
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.63
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 2.63
834
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.83
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 2.62
835
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.4
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.62
836
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 40.05
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.62
837
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63.36
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.62
838
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.91
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.62
839
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.91
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.62
840
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 195.65
TTFR rankings: 512
Ratio Superior: 2.62
841
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.27
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 2.61
842
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.15
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 2.61
843
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.28
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 2.61
844
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.61
845
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 126.32
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 2.6
846
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 142.48
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 2.6
847
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.38
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.6
848
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.83
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.6
849
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.83
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.6
850
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.39
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 2.59
851
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.39
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 2.59
852
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.39
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 2.59
853
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.59
854
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.15
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.59
855
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.15
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.59
856
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.89
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.58
857
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.31
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.58
858
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.15
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 2.58
859
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.42
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.57
860
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.47
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 2.57
861
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.47
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 2.57
862
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.96
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.57
863
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.57
864
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.43
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.56
865
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.56
866
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.47
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 2.56
867
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 155.38
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 2.56
868
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 307.29
TTFR rankings: 785
Ratio Superior: 2.55
869
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.55
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.55
870
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.44
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.55
871
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 190.75
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 2.55
872
Age: 16
Average rating: 129.33
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 2.54
873
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.89
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.54
874
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.65
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.54
875
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 101.04
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 2.53
876
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 182.01
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 2.53
877
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.91
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.53
878
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.01
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.53
879
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.7
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.52
880
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.72
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.52
881
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.52
882
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 256.16
TTFR rankings: 644
Ratio Superior: 2.51
883
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.97
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 2.51
884
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 119.85
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 2.51
885
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.51
886
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.15
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 2.51
887
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 256.16
TTFR rankings: 642
Ratio Superior: 2.51
888
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 218.45
TTFR rankings: 547
Ratio Superior: 2.5
889
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 126.32
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 2.49
890
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.39
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.49
891
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.49
892
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.35
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.49
893
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.91
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.49
894
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 126.32
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 2.49
895
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.89
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.48
896
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 218.45
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 2.48
897
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 98.54
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.48
898
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.29
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 2.48
899
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.89
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.48
900
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 40.05
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.47

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников