The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 17
Average rating: 181.72
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 2.54
902
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.49
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.53
903
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.52
904
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.52
905
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 119.46
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 2.52
906
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 2.51
907
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 172.74
TTFR rankings: 433
Ratio Superior: 2.51
908
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.78
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.5
909
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 189.75
TTFR rankings: 475
Ratio Superior: 2.5
910
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 74.52
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.5
911
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.3
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.49
912
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.27
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.49
913
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.27
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.49
914
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.49
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.49
915
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.18
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.49
916
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.06
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.49
917
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.89
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.48
918
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 143.04
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 2.48
919
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 69.45
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.48
920
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 69.45
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.48
921
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.07
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.47
922
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.07
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.47
923
Age: 8.1
Average rating: 4.46
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 2.47
924
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.47
925
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.3
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.47
926
Age: 20
Average rating: 383.41
TTFR rankings: 945
Ratio Superior: 2.46
927
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 65.33
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 2.46
928
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.39
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.46
929
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.14
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 2.46
930
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.08
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.45
931
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.08
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.45
932
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.45
933
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 196.55
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.43
934
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 172.74
TTFR rankings: 419
Ratio Superior: 2.43
935
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.64
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.42
936
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.18
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.42
937
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.23
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.42
938
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.75
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.42
939
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.76
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 2.41
940
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 86.54
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 2.4
941
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.4
942
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.67
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 2.4
943
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.4
944
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.97
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.39
945
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.35
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 2.39
946
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.39
947
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.99
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.39
948
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 86.54
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.38
949
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.51
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.38
950
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.18
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.37
951
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.33
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.37
952
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.33
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.37
953
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.24
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.37
954
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.24
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.37
955
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.37
956
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.72
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 2.37
957
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 71
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.37
958
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.67
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 2.36
959
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 160.06
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 2.36
960
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.99
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.36
961
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.43
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.36
962
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.64
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.35
963
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.35
964
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 120.47
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 2.35
965
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 81.36
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 2.34
966
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 196.32
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 2.33
967
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 91.39
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 2.33
968
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 160.06
TTFR rankings: 373
Ratio Superior: 2.33
969
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.64
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.33
970
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.75
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.33
971
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 306.36
TTFR rankings: 713
Ratio Superior: 2.33
972
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.3
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.33
973
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.21
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.32
974
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 189.75
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 2.32
975
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.32
976
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 143.04
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 2.31
977
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 96.01
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.31
978
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.97
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.31
979
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.31
980
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 207.49
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 2.3
981
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.49
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 2.3
982
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.07
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.3
983
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 71
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 2.3
984
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2.3
985
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.35
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 2.29
986
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.29
987
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 81.36
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.29
988
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.81
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.29
989
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.91
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.28
990
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.75
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.28
991
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 115.54
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 2.28
992
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.27
993
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.69
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.27
994
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.26
995
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 319.37
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 2.26
996
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 83.71
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.26
997
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.3
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 2.25
998
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.08
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.25
999
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 114.57
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1000
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 115.54
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.25

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников