The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№901
Age: 17
Average rating: 181.72
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№902
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.49
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№903
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№904
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№905
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 119.46
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№906
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№907
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 172.74
TTFR rankings: 433
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№908
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.78
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№909
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 189.75
TTFR rankings: 475
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№910
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 74.52
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№911
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.3
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№912
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.27
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№913
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.27
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№914
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.49
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№915
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.18
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№916
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.06
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№917
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.89
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№918
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 143.04
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№919
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 69.45
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№920
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 69.45
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№921
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.07
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№922
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.07
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№923
Age: 8.1
Average rating: 4.46
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№924
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№925
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.3
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№926
Age: 20
Average rating: 383.41
TTFR rankings: 945
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№927
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 65.33
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№928
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.39
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№929
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.14
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№930
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.08
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№931
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.08
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№932
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№933
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 196.55
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№934
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 172.74
TTFR rankings: 419
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№935
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.64
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№936
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.18
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№937
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.23
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№938
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.75
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№939
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.76
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№940
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 86.54
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№941
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№942
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.67
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№943
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№944
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.97
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№945
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.35
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№946
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№947
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.99
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№948
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 86.54
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№949
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.51
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№950
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.18
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№951
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.33
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№952
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.33
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№953
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.24
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№954
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.24
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№955
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№956
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.72
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№957
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 71
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№958
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.67
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№959
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 160.06
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№960
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.99
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№961
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.43
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№962
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.64
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№963
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№964
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 120.47
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№965
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 81.36
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№966
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 196.32
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№967
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 91.39
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№968
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 160.06
TTFR rankings: 373
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№969
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.64
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№970
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.75
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№971
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 306.36
TTFR rankings: 713
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№972
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.3
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№973
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.21
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№974
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 189.75
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№975
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№976
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 143.04
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№977
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 96.01
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№978
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.97
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№979
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№980
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 207.49
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№981
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.49
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№982
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.07
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№983
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 71
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№984
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№985
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.35
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№986
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№987
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 81.36
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№988
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.81
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№989
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.91
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.28
№990
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.75
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.28
№991
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 115.54
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 2.28
№992
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№993
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.69
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№994
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.26
№995
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 319.37
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 2.26
№996
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 83.71
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.26
№997
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.3
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№998
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.08
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№999
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 114.57
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№1000
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 115.54
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.25
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников