The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1001
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 117.8
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.21
№1002
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.9
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1003
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.38
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1004
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.38
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1005
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.52
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1006
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.42
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1007
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.41
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1008
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.5
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1009
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.6
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1010
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.22
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1011
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.3
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1012
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.25
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 2.17
№1013
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.15
№1014
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.91
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.15
№1015
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.7
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1016
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 214.02
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1017
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.1
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1018
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.93
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1019
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.65
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1020
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.65
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1021
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 92.22
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1022
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 204.56
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1023
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 175.34
TTFR rankings: 372
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1024
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1025
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1026
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1027
Age: 16
Average rating: 129.29
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1028
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.33
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1029
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.64
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1030
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.04
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1031
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.44
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1032
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.89
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1033
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.25
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1034
Age: 18
Average rating: 223.11
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 2.1
№1035
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 98.49
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.09
№1036
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.42
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 2.09
№1037
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.89
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.09
№1038
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 217.53
TTFR rankings: 454
Ratio Superior: 2.09
№1039
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.5
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.08
№1040
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.91
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.08
№1041
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.45
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 2.08
№1042
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.25
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.08
№1043
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 263.21
TTFR rankings: 546
Ratio Superior: 2.07
№1044
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.45
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.07
№1045
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.1
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.06
№1046
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.3
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.06
№1047
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.05
№1048
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.04
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.05
№1049
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.27
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№1050
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.11
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№1051
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.85
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№1052
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.63
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№1053
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.63
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№1054
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.1
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№1055
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.42
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№1056
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.58
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.02
№1057
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.39
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 2.02
№1058
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.22
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 2.02
№1059
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.22
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 2.02
№1060
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.4
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№1061
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 81.94
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№1062
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.89
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№1063
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.44
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№1064
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.36
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 2
№1065
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 275.41
TTFR rankings: 551
Ratio Superior: 2
№1066
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.13
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2
№1067
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 140.06
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№1068
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.15
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№1069
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 55.37
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№1070
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 71.12
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1071
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.52
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1072
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.57
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1073
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.63
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1074
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.93
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1075
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1076
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 121.05
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№1077
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.33
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№1078
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.52
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1079
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.16
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1080
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.44
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1081
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.44
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1082
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.44
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1083
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.42
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1084
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.46
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1085
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.27
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1086
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 199.68
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1087
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.97
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1088
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.97
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1089
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 100.99
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1090
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.4
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1091
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.4
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1092
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.29
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1093
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.58
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1094
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 155.69
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1095
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.02
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1096
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 98.49
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1097
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.67
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1098
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.67
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1099
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.65
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1100
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.39
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.92
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
