The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.91
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 22.25
№2
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.6
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 21.65
№3
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.68
TTFR rankings: 680
Ratio Superior: 20.81
№4
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 18.6
№5
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.65
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 18.45
№6
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 18.19
№7
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.79
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 17.9
№8
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 46.05
TTFR rankings: 778
Ratio Superior: 16.89
№9
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 16.36
№10
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 27.08
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 16.03
№11
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.73
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 16.01
№12
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.65
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 15.92
№13
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.21
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 15.7
№14
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.91
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 15.59
№15
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 15.46
№16
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 15.42
№17
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.12
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 15.32
№18
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.49
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 15.22
№19
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.48
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 14.64
№20
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 14.41
№21
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.73
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 14.22
№22
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.63
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 14.16
№23
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 57.03
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 13.87
№24
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.8
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 13.76
№25
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.08
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 13.59
№26
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 84.28
TTFR rankings: 1133
Ratio Superior: 13.44
№27
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 57.03
TTFR rankings: 761
Ratio Superior: 13.34
№28
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.65
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 13.19
№29
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 13.12
№30
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 69.49
TTFR rankings: 908
Ratio Superior: 13.07
№31
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.01
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 13.05
№32
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.49
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 12.92
№33
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.1
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 12.6
№34
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.83
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 12.43
№35
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 57.03
TTFR rankings: 695
Ratio Superior: 12.19
№36
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 143.54
TTFR rankings: 1746
Ratio Superior: 12.16
№37
Age: 14
Average rating: 62.7
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 12.09
№38
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 64.77
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 11.92
№39
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.6
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 11.65
№40
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.65
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 11.58
№41
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.24
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 11.51
№42
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.08
TTFR rankings: 426
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№43
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.65
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 11.48
№44
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 11.31
№45
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.1
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 11.22
№46
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.49
TTFR rankings: 495
Ratio Superior: 11.13
№47
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.41
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 11.09
№48
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 27.08
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 11
№49
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.33
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№50
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 10.78
№51
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.1
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№52
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 150.38
TTFR rankings: 1618
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№53
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.21
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№54
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.48
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 10.71
№55
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 79.12
TTFR rankings: 846
Ratio Superior: 10.69
№56
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.83
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 10.61
№57
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 10.51
№58
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.83
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 10.45
№59
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 80.39
TTFR rankings: 837
Ratio Superior: 10.41
№60
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.14
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 10.25
№61
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 138.04
TTFR rankings: 1403
Ratio Superior: 10.16
№62
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.03
TTFR rankings: 691
Ratio Superior: 10.16
№63
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 73.53
TTFR rankings: 745
Ratio Superior: 10.13
№64
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.12
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 10.13
№65
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.08
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№66
Age: 16
Average rating: 121.32
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 9.99
№67
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 9.94
№68
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.82
TTFR rankings: 981
Ratio Superior: 9.93
№69
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.82
TTFR rankings: 972
Ratio Superior: 9.84
№70
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 76.85
TTFR rankings: 751
Ratio Superior: 9.77
№71
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.72
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 9.71
№72
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 9.69
№73
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 9.61
№74
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.99
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 9.43
№75
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.65
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 9.41
№76
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.65
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 9.35
№77
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.72
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 9.34
№78
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.65
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 9.31
№79
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.65
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 9.3
№80
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.28
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 9.26
№81
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.43
TTFR rankings: 439
Ratio Superior: 9.26
№82
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.14
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№83
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 46.05
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 9.16
№84
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.82
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.09
№85
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.82
TTFR rankings: 889
Ratio Superior: 9
№86
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 88.06
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 8.98
№87
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 27.08
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 8.94
№88
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.43
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 8.92
№89
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 113.73
TTFR rankings: 1011
Ratio Superior: 8.89
№90
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 50.31
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 8.85
№91
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 8.8
№92
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.65
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 8.78
№93
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.48
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 8.67
№94
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.74
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№95
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 8.63
№96
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 84.28
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 8.61
№97
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 61.3
TTFR rankings: 523
Ratio Superior: 8.53
№98
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.72
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 8.52
№99
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.97
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 8.52
№100
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 65.99
TTFR rankings: 560
Ratio Superior: 8.49
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
