The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 132.62
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 1.8
902
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.46
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 1.8
903
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.59
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.8
904
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.87
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 1.79
905
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.78
906
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.39
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.78
907
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.6
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.78
908
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.41
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.78
909
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.25
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.78
910
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.54
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 1.78
911
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.79
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.78
912
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.71
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.77
913
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.77
914
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.46
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.77
915
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.08
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.77
916
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 193.33
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 1.77
917
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.6
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.77
918
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 21.5
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.77
919
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 65.1
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.77
920
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.34
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.76
921
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.54
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 1.76
922
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.34
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.76
923
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 193.33
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 1.76
924
Age: 9
Average rating: 20.53
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.75
925
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.41
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.75
926
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.75
927
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.5
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.75
928
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.78
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.74
929
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.21
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.74
930
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.46
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.74
931
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 136.91
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 1.74
932
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.53
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 1.74
933
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.73
934
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 150.96
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 1.73
935
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 56.82
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.72
936
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.32
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 1.72
937
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.72
938
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.78
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.72
939
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.44
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.71
940
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.32
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.71
941
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.71
942
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.71
943
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 69.17
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.71
944
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.09
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 1.7
945
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.7
946
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 193.33
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 1.7
947
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 193.33
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 1.7
948
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.17
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.7
949
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.54
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.7
950
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.54
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.7
951
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.7
952
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 89.71
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 1.69
953
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.69
954
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.6
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 1.69
955
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 118.14
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 1.68
956
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 143.43
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 1.68
957
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.53
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.68
958
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 252.27
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 1.67
959
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.67
960
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.66
961
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.66
962
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 325.84
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 1.66
963
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.09
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.66
964
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 122.35
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 1.65
965
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.88
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.65
966
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.44
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.64
967
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 336.99
TTFR rankings: 552
Ratio Superior: 1.64
968
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.39
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.63
969
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.63
970
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.84
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 1.63
971
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.93
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.63
972
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.17
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.63
973
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 122.35
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 1.63
974
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.45
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.62
975
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.62
976
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.62
977
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.9
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.62
978
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.93
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.61
979
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 72.66
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.61
980
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.89
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.61
981
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.59
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 1.61
982
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.41
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.61
983
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.08
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.61
984
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.66
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 1.61
985
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.6
986
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.6
987
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.74
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.6
988
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.45
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.59
989
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.66
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 1.59
990
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.74
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.58
991
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.99
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.58
992
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.93
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.58
993
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 159.2
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 1.58
994
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 65.1
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.58
995
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.84
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 1.58
996
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 21.5
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.58
997
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 251.81
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 1.58
998
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 325.84
TTFR rankings: 515
Ratio Superior: 1.58
999
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1000
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.58

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников