The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
701
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 151
TTFR rankings: 481
Ratio Superior: 3.19
702
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.32
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.18
703
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 65.32
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 3.18
704
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 116.53
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 3.18
705
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.43
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3.18
706
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.44
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 3.18
707
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.71
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 3.17
708
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.22
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.17
709
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.19
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.17
710
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.45
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.16
711
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.88
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 3.16
712
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.14
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 3.16
713
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.19
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 3.16
714
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.3
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 3.14
715
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.93
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.14
716
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.14
TTFR rankings: 571
Ratio Superior: 3.13
717
Age: 18
Average rating: 218.61
TTFR rankings: 685
Ratio Superior: 3.13
718
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.13
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.13
719
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.28
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.13
720
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.28
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.13
721
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.19
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 3.13
722
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.21
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3.1
723
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.19
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.1
724
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 86.78
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 3.1
725
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.02
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 3.1
726
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.77
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.09
727
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.09
728
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.41
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 3.09
729
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.44
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.08
730
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 119.16
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 3.08
731
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 57.61
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 3.07
732
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 190.15
TTFR rankings: 584
Ratio Superior: 3.07
733
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.3
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.06
734
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 215.53
TTFR rankings: 660
Ratio Superior: 3.06
735
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.32
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 3.06
736
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.48
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 3.05
737
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.05
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.05
738
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.47
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.05
739
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 3.05
740
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 8.88
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 3.04
741
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.04
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 3.04
742
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.88
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 3.04
743
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.19
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 3.04
744
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 120.17
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 3.03
745
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 95.99
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 3.02
746
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.59
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.01
747
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.59
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.01
748
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.27
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 3.01
749
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3
750
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.05
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 3
751
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.04
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.99
752
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.14
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 2.99
753
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.44
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.99
754
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 91.35
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 2.99
755
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 123.22
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 2.99
756
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 71.07
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 2.98
757
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.77
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.98
758
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 173.36
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 2.98
759
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.13
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.97
760
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.47
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.97
761
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 205.86
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 2.96
762
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 83.74
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 2.96
763
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.88
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.95
764
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.21
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.95
765
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 57.61
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 2.95
766
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.95
767
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.95
768
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 2.94
769
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.05
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.94
770
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.05
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.94
771
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 377.79
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 2.94
772
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 91.35
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 2.93
773
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.75
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.93
774
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.41
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 2.93
775
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.32
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.93
776
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.41
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 2.92
777
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.3
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.91
778
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.77
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.91
779
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.97
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.91
780
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.35
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.91
781
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.35
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.91
782
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.71
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.9
783
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 69.52
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 2.89
784
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 178.51
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 2.89
785
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.88
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.89
786
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.88
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.89
787
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.19
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.89
788
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.43
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.89
789
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.93
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.89
790
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.64
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.89
791
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 4.85
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 2.89
792
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 5.2
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 2.88
793
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.46
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.88
794
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 2.88
795
Age: 15
Average rating: 93.81
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 2.87
796
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 186.78
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 2.86
797
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.29
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.86
798
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.87
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 2.86
799
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.45
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.86
800
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.05
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 2.85

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников