The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№601
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.13
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 3.68
№602
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.01
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 3.68
№603
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.88
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№604
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 410.18
TTFR rankings: 1505
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№605
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 369.23
TTFR rankings: 1352
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№606
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 74.87
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№607
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.2
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№608
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.71
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№609
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№610
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 99.12
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№611
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.06
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№612
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.21
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№613
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.21
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№614
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.66
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№615
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 67.61
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 3.61
№616
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 136.05
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 3.6
№617
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.33
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 3.6
№618
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.01
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 3.6
№619
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.52
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 3.6
№620
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.68
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№621
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.19
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№622
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 57.04
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№623
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.18
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№624
Age: 16
Average rating: 123.94
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 3.57
№625
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.79
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 3.57
№626
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 3.56
№627
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.01
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 3.56
№628
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.67
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 3.55
№629
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.49
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 3.55
№630
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.04
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 3.55
№631
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 139.88
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№632
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.92
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№633
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 104.86
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№634
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 118.65
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№635
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.13
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№636
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.4
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№637
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 63.33
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 3.49
№638
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.2
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.49
№639
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№640
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 179.27
TTFR rankings: 623
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№641
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.68
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№642
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№643
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.83
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№644
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 82.43
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№645
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.67
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№646
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 82.43
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№647
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.79
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№648
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.88
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№649
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.2
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№650
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 286.82
TTFR rankings: 983
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№651
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.67
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№652
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 198.42
TTFR rankings: 679
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№653
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№654
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.82
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№655
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№656
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.49
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№657
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.01
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№658
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 114.41
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№659
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.83
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№660
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.68
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№661
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 63.33
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.39
№662
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 3.39
№663
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.2
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3.39
№664
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№665
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.67
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№666
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.82
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№667
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.88
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№668
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.85
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№669
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 63.33
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№670
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.79
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№671
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.04
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№672
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.4
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№673
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 144.77
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№674
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.92
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№675
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.24
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№676
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.18
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№677
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 67.61
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 3.33
№678
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 3.32
№679
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.44
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.32
№680
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.13
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.32
№681
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.67
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.32
№682
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.78
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№683
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 129.07
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№684
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 84.37
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№685
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 7.87
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 3.3
№686
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 115.18
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 3.3
№687
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 72.02
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 3.29
№688
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 276.4
TTFR rankings: 909
Ratio Superior: 3.29
№689
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.71
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 3.29
№690
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.49
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 3.28
№691
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 47.66
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.27
№692
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 101.45
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 3.27
№693
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.49
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№694
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.88
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№695
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 120.14
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 3.25
№696
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.18
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 3.25
№697
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.83
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.25
№698
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 3.24
№699
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.03
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 3.24
№700
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 78.96
TTFR rankings: 255
Ratio Superior: 3.23
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
