The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 3.85
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 40.26
№2
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 12.93
TTFR rankings: 428
Ratio Superior: 33.1
№3
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 7.29
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 32.92
№4
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 18.39
TTFR rankings: 576
Ratio Superior: 31.32
№5
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 2.23
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 29.6
№6
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 10.1
TTFR rankings: 292
Ratio Superior: 28.91
№7
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 15.62
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 26.7
№8
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 24.04
№9
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 673
Ratio Superior: 23.7
№10
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 23.4
№11
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 17.2
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 23.14
№12
Age: 10
Average rating: 8.35
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 22.75
№13
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 22.57
№14
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 5.13
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 21.83
№15
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 21.31
№16
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 21.19
№17
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 12.18
TTFR rankings: 255
Ratio Superior: 20.94
№18
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 8.05
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 20.87
№19
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 8.05
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 20.62
№20
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.64
TTFR rankings: 1063
Ratio Superior: 20.58
№21
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 12.93
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 20.57
№22
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 23.48
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 20.32
№23
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 9
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 19.89
№24
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 24.44
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 19.89
№25
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 19.27
№26
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 4.28
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 18.69
№27
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 20.17
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 18.64
№28
Age: 16
Average rating: 86.66
TTFR rankings: 1611
Ratio Superior: 18.59
№29
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 4.6
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 18.26
№30
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 12.18
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 18.23
№31
Age: 8
Average rating: 1.56
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 17.95
№32
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 59.24
TTFR rankings: 1062
Ratio Superior: 17.93
№33
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 11.35
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 17.89
№34
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 34.12
TTFR rankings: 605
Ratio Superior: 17.73
№35
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 82.28
TTFR rankings: 1458
Ratio Superior: 17.72
№36
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 59.24
TTFR rankings: 1039
Ratio Superior: 17.54
№37
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 9.7
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 17.53
№38
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 9.7
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 17.22
№39
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 25.75
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 16.85
№40
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 15.11
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 16.68
№41
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 16.57
№42
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 12.93
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 16.55
№43
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 16.49
№44
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 16.29
№45
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 92.1
TTFR rankings: 1490
Ratio Superior: 16.18
№46
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 39.25
TTFR rankings: 628
Ratio Superior: 16
№47
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 15.11
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 15.88
№48
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 71.11
TTFR rankings: 1122
Ratio Superior: 15.78
№49
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 37.92
TTFR rankings: 595
Ratio Superior: 15.69
№50
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 41.54
TTFR rankings: 649
Ratio Superior: 15.62
№51
Age: 13
Average rating: 32.84
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 15.38
№52
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 22.63
TTFR rankings: 347
Ratio Superior: 15.33
№53
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 15.28
№54
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 15.14
№55
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 48.99
TTFR rankings: 741
Ratio Superior: 15.13
№56
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 59.24
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 15.02
№57
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 13.46
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 15.01
№58
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 17.2
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 15
№59
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 15.11
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 14.89
№60
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 22.63
TTFR rankings: 335
Ratio Superior: 14.8
№61
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 8.05
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 14.78
№62
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 22.63
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 14.71
№63
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 34.12
TTFR rankings: 502
Ratio Superior: 14.71
№64
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 17.2
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 14.71
№65
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 14.59
№66
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 47.52
TTFR rankings: 686
Ratio Superior: 14.44
№67
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 14.27
№68
Age: 12
Average rating: 21.56
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 14.19
№69
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 44.3
TTFR rankings: 623
Ratio Superior: 14.06
№70
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 30.99
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 14
№71
Age: 13
Average rating: 32.84
TTFR rankings: 459
Ratio Superior: 13.98
№72
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 13.82
№73
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 16.16
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 13.8
№74
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 59.24
TTFR rankings: 816
Ratio Superior: 13.77
№75
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 26.99
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 13.56
№76
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 36.85
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 13.54
№77
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 35.67
TTFR rankings: 483
Ratio Superior: 13.54
№78
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 15.62
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 13.38
№79
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 29.87
TTFR rankings: 393
Ratio Superior: 13.16
№80
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 64.7
TTFR rankings: 846
Ratio Superior: 13.08
№81
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 61.04
TTFR rankings: 794
Ratio Superior: 13.01
№82
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 6.62
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 12.99
№83
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 16.16
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 12.93
№84
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 9
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 12.89
№85
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 16.47
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 12.81
№86
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 362
Ratio Superior: 12.75
№87
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 35.67
TTFR rankings: 454
Ratio Superior: 12.73
№88
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 2.84
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 12.68
№89
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 33.35
TTFR rankings: 421
Ratio Superior: 12.62
№90
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 17.2
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 12.62
№91
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 40.19
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 12.59
№92
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 12.45
№93
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 15.62
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 12.42
№94
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 12.39
№95
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 54.57
TTFR rankings: 675
Ratio Superior: 12.37
№96
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 12.31
№97
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 24.44
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 12.23
№98
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 12.93
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 12.22
№99
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 6.31
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 12.2
№100
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 20.78
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 12.18
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
