The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.11
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 25.51
2
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.66
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 25.12
3
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.24
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 20.51
4
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.62
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 20.29
5
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.29
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 20.22
6
Age: 14
Average rating: 52.57
TTFR rankings: 1063
Ratio Superior: 20.22
7
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.08
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 19.4
8
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 89.32
TTFR rankings: 1611
Ratio Superior: 18.04
9
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 82.93
TTFR rankings: 1458
Ratio Superior: 17.58
10
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 60.16
TTFR rankings: 1052
Ratio Superior: 17.49
11
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.3
TTFR rankings: 352
Ratio Superior: 17.34
12
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.03
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 17.26
13
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 13.95
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 17.2
14
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 61.62
TTFR rankings: 1043
Ratio Superior: 16.93
15
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.63
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 16.85
16
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 16.56
17
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.48
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 16.54
18
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.03
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 16.15
19
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.85
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 16.09
20
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.24
TTFR rankings: 405
Ratio Superior: 16.05
21
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 93.07
TTFR rankings: 1490
Ratio Superior: 16.01
22
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.3
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 15.81
23
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 36.69
TTFR rankings: 572
Ratio Superior: 15.59
24
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 34.52
TTFR rankings: 534
Ratio Superior: 15.47
25
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 72.93
TTFR rankings: 1122
Ratio Superior: 15.38
26
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.03
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 15.38
27
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 40.54
TTFR rankings: 612
Ratio Superior: 15.1
28
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.62
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 15.06
29
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 60.16
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 14.79
30
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 50.48
TTFR rankings: 746
Ratio Superior: 14.78
31
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 42.55
TTFR rankings: 626
Ratio Superior: 14.71
32
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.09
TTFR rankings: 320
Ratio Superior: 14.49
33
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 35.22
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 14.17
34
Age: 13
Average rating: 38.06
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 14.11
35
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.41
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 14.09
36
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 48.91
TTFR rankings: 686
Ratio Superior: 14.03
37
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.11
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 13.97
38
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 12.96
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 13.73
39
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.15
TTFR rankings: 372
Ratio Superior: 13.7
40
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 45.74
TTFR rankings: 623
Ratio Superior: 13.62
41
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 33.57
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 13.61
42
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 60.16
TTFR rankings: 816
Ratio Superior: 13.56
43
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.09
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 13.26
44
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 36.69
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 13.03
45
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.24
TTFR rankings: 326
Ratio Superior: 12.92
46
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 65.92
TTFR rankings: 846
Ratio Superior: 12.83
47
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 32.62
TTFR rankings: 418
Ratio Superior: 12.81
48
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 40.54
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 12.8
49
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.41
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 12.66
50
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.58
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 12.55
51
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.09
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 12.49
52
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 12.44
53
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 394
Ratio Superior: 12.37
54
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.62
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 12.09
55
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 63.51
TTFR rankings: 763
Ratio Superior: 12.01
56
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 56.23
TTFR rankings: 675
Ratio Superior: 12
57
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.87
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 11.86
58
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 28.41
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 11.83
59
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.41
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 11.8
60
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.48
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 11.69
61
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.58
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 11.64
62
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 11.52
63
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 11.52
64
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 34.52
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 11.5
65
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.63
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 11.49
66
Age: 14
Average rating: 52.57
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 11.43
67
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.08
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 11.39
68
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 30.96
TTFR rankings: 352
Ratio Superior: 11.37
69
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 36.69
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 11.37
70
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 76.18
TTFR rankings: 856
Ratio Superior: 11.24
71
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 13.4
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 11.19
72
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.56
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 11.17
73
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 138.74
TTFR rankings: 1546
Ratio Superior: 11.14
74
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 115.86
TTFR rankings: 1291
Ratio Superior: 11.14
75
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.19
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 11.13
76
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 43.99
TTFR rankings: 488
Ratio Superior: 11.09
77
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 46.49
TTFR rankings: 511
Ratio Superior: 10.99
78
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 63.51
TTFR rankings: 697
Ratio Superior: 10.97
79
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 27.81
TTFR rankings: 305
Ratio Superior: 10.97
80
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.38
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 10.96
81
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.41
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 10.94
82
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.87
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 10.86
83
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 111.71
TTFR rankings: 1205
Ratio Superior: 10.79
84
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 71.39
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 10.74
85
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 36.69
TTFR rankings: 394
Ratio Superior: 10.74
86
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 63.51
TTFR rankings: 680
Ratio Superior: 10.71
87
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 36.69
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 10.66
88
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 159.9
TTFR rankings: 1702
Ratio Superior: 10.64
89
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 54.16
TTFR rankings: 576
Ratio Superior: 10.64
90
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.93
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 10.62
91
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 42.55
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 10.6
92
Age: 15
Average rating: 69.3
TTFR rankings: 730
Ratio Superior: 10.53
93
Age: 10
Average rating: 13.66
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 10.47
94
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.15
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 10.35
95
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 10.33
96
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 57.82
TTFR rankings: 597
Ratio Superior: 10.33
97
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.3
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 10.3
98
Age: 14
Average rating: 52.57
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 10.29
99
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.62
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 10.26
100
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 10.24

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников