The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.17
TTFR rankings: 623
Ratio Superior: 26.89
№2
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 9.18
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 25.38
№3
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 13.33
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 23.48
№4
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 68.95
TTFR rankings: 1596
Ratio Superior: 23.15
№5
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.62
TTFR rankings: 383
Ratio Superior: 21.74
№6
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 42.06
TTFR rankings: 899
Ratio Superior: 21.37
№7
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 73.7
TTFR rankings: 1492
Ratio Superior: 20.24
№8
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 11.74
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 20.02
№9
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 15.39
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 19.69
№10
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.23
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 19.09
№11
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.05
TTFR rankings: 395
Ratio Superior: 18.76
№12
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 65.98
TTFR rankings: 1229
Ratio Superior: 18.63
№13
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 31.17
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 18.45
№14
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.43
TTFR rankings: 374
Ratio Superior: 18.31
№15
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 534
Ratio Superior: 18.19
№16
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 39.97
TTFR rankings: 719
Ratio Superior: 17.99
№17
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 466
Ratio Superior: 17.49
№18
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.1
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 17.3
№19
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 48.81
TTFR rankings: 841
Ratio Superior: 17.23
№20
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 59.31
TTFR rankings: 1014
Ratio Superior: 17.1
№21
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 36.18
TTFR rankings: 615
Ratio Superior: 17
№22
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 11.74
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 16.61
№23
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 11.02
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 16.61
№24
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.92
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 16.57
№25
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 48.81
TTFR rankings: 804
Ratio Superior: 16.47
№26
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 50.09
TTFR rankings: 813
Ratio Superior: 16.23
№27
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.07
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 16.18
№28
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 30.49
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 16.07
№29
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 27.96
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 15.99
№30
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.93
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 15.95
№31
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 48.81
TTFR rankings: 768
Ratio Superior: 15.73
№32
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 90.27
TTFR rankings: 1414
Ratio Superior: 15.66
№33
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 415
Ratio Superior: 15.57
№34
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 15.5
№35
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.17
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 15.45
№36
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 38.93
TTFR rankings: 598
Ratio Superior: 15.36
№37
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 21.7
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 15.35
№38
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 15.15
№39
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 13.33
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 15.08
№40
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 25.05
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 15.01
№41
Age: 16
Average rating: 83.9
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 14.95
№42
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 48.81
TTFR rankings: 728
Ratio Superior: 14.91
№43
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.1
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 14.82
№44
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.92
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 14.76
№45
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 34.83
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 14.5
№46
Age: 13
Average rating: 33.8
TTFR rankings: 488
Ratio Superior: 14.44
№47
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.43
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 14.43
№48
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 68.95
TTFR rankings: 991
Ratio Superior: 14.37
№49
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 9.89
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 14.36
№50
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 71.38
TTFR rankings: 1013
Ratio Superior: 14.19
№51
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.79
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 14.05
№52
Age: 15
Average rating: 62.28
TTFR rankings: 874
Ratio Superior: 14.03
№53
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.42
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 13.87
№54
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.6
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 13.84
№55
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 53.39
TTFR rankings: 736
Ratio Superior: 13.79
№56
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.92
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 13.76
№57
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12.77
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 13.55
№58
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.42
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 13.47
№59
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 56.59
TTFR rankings: 756
Ratio Superior: 13.36
№60
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 27.25
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 13.36
№61
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 25.05
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 13.33
№62
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 110.81
TTFR rankings: 1474
Ratio Superior: 13.3
№63
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12.77
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 13.23
№64
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 42.06
TTFR rankings: 553
Ratio Superior: 13.15
№65
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.6
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 13.08
№66
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 126.91
TTFR rankings: 1659
Ratio Superior: 13.07
№67
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.43
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№68
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 50.09
TTFR rankings: 652
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№69
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.92
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 12.95
№70
Age: 14
Average rating: 44.98
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 12.92
№71
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 32.76
TTFR rankings: 420
Ratio Superior: 12.82
№72
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.04
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 12.79
№73
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 373
Ratio Superior: 12.71
№74
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 12.57
№75
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.23
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 12.54
№76
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 42.06
TTFR rankings: 526
Ratio Superior: 12.51
№77
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 12.5
№78
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.63
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 12.33
№79
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 12.16
№80
Age: 13
Average rating: 33.8
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 11.95
№81
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.85
TTFR rankings: 449
Ratio Superior: 11.86
№82
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 132.52
TTFR rankings: 1571
Ratio Superior: 11.85
№83
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 73.7
TTFR rankings: 870
Ratio Superior: 11.8
№84
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 24.25
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 11.75
№85
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 46.08
TTFR rankings: 539
Ratio Superior: 11.7
№86
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 36.91
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 11.68
№87
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 43.19
TTFR rankings: 502
Ratio Superior: 11.62
№88
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 10.36
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 11.58
№89
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 90.27
TTFR rankings: 1041
Ratio Superior: 11.53
№90
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.05
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 11.45
№91
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 90.27
TTFR rankings: 1014
Ratio Superior: 11.23
№92
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.07
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 11.23
№93
Age: 12
Average rating: 23.67
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 11.07
№94
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 57.81
TTFR rankings: 634
Ratio Superior: 10.97
№95
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 15.39
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 10.92
№96
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 10.87
№97
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 76.07
TTFR rankings: 822
Ratio Superior: 10.81
№98
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 29.35
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№99
Age: 12
Average rating: 23.67
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 10.73
№100
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.43
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 10.67
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
