The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.52
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 21.12
№2
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 23.2
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 19.22
№3
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 40.41
TTFR rankings: 775
Ratio Superior: 19.18
№4
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 18.07
№5
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.07
TTFR rankings: 628
Ratio Superior: 17.41
№6
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.73
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 17.4
№7
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.84
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 17.19
№8
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.8
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 16.98
№9
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 765
Ratio Superior: 16.66
№10
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 15.92
№11
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 40.41
TTFR rankings: 637
Ratio Superior: 15.76
№12
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 65.48
TTFR rankings: 1022
Ratio Superior: 15.61
№13
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.73
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 15.34
№14
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 77.85
TTFR rankings: 1188
Ratio Superior: 15.26
№15
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.21
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 15.16
№16
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.11
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 14.81
№17
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 58.96
TTFR rankings: 845
Ratio Superior: 14.33
№18
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 44.63
TTFR rankings: 637
Ratio Superior: 14.27
№19
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 44.63
TTFR rankings: 631
Ratio Superior: 14.14
№20
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 54.45
TTFR rankings: 766
Ratio Superior: 14.07
№21
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.66
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 13.59
№22
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.71
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 13.56
№23
Age: 17
Average rating: 129.86
TTFR rankings: 1754
Ratio Superior: 13.51
№24
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 608
Ratio Superior: 13.24
№25
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 54.45
TTFR rankings: 720
Ratio Superior: 13.22
№26
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 60.82
TTFR rankings: 787
Ratio Superior: 12.94
№27
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.25
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 12.89
№28
Age: 13
Average rating: 38.15
TTFR rankings: 482
Ratio Superior: 12.63
№29
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 54.45
TTFR rankings: 687
Ratio Superior: 12.62
№30
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 12.59
№31
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 22.82
TTFR rankings: 287
Ratio Superior: 12.58
№32
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26
TTFR rankings: 326
Ratio Superior: 12.54
№33
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 39.11
TTFR rankings: 489
Ratio Superior: 12.5
№34
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 75.13
TTFR rankings: 926
Ratio Superior: 12.33
№35
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 64.04
TTFR rankings: 785
Ratio Superior: 12.26
№36
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.74
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 12.25
№37
Age: 11
Average rating: 21.65
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 12.24
№38
Age: 13
Average rating: 38.15
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 12.16
№39
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 110.23
TTFR rankings: 1318
Ratio Superior: 11.96
№40
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 135.93
TTFR rankings: 1616
Ratio Superior: 11.89
№41
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 17.92
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 11.77
№42
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 73.84
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 11.73
№43
Age: 14
Average rating: 51.67
TTFR rankings: 599
Ratio Superior: 11.59
№44
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.6
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 11.47
№45
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.66
TTFR rankings: 316
Ratio Superior: 11.42
№46
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 126.12
TTFR rankings: 1438
Ratio Superior: 11.4
№47
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 39.11
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 11.38
№48
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 90.53
TTFR rankings: 1028
Ratio Superior: 11.36
№49
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 56.49
TTFR rankings: 640
Ratio Superior: 11.33
№50
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 90.53
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 11.31
№51
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 73.84
TTFR rankings: 823
Ratio Superior: 11.15
№52
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 68.64
TTFR rankings: 764
Ratio Superior: 11.13
№53
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 21.52
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 11.11
№54
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 71.27
TTFR rankings: 783
Ratio Superior: 10.99
№55
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.11
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 10.93
№56
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.7
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 10.85
№57
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 42.49
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 10.78
№58
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 46.87
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№59
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.74
TTFR rankings: 350
Ratio Superior: 10.69
№60
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.8
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 10.67
№61
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.25
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 10.67
№62
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.84
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 10.63
№63
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 22.82
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№64
Age: 10
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№65
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 18.61
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 10.59
№66
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 62.01
TTFR rankings: 652
Ratio Superior: 10.51
№67
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.89
TTFR rankings: 322
Ratio Superior: 10.42
№68
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 49.04
TTFR rankings: 508
Ratio Superior: 10.36
№69
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.6
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 10.35
№70
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 21.52
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 10.32
№71
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 56.49
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 10.27
№72
Age: 14
Average rating: 51.67
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 10.24
№73
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 68.64
TTFR rankings: 699
Ratio Superior: 10.18
№74
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 21.9
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 10.18
№75
Age: 13
Average rating: 38.15
TTFR rankings: 382
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№76
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 22.82
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 9.99
№77
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 52.6
TTFR rankings: 525
Ratio Superior: 9.98
№78
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.71
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 9.97
№79
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 23.2
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 9.96
№80
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 90.53
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.92
№81
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 90.53
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.92
№82
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 46.87
TTFR rankings: 463
Ratio Superior: 9.88
№83
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 23.2
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 9.83
№84
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 101.08
TTFR rankings: 991
Ratio Superior: 9.8
№85
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 41.53
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 9.8
№86
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 103.79
TTFR rankings: 1009
Ratio Superior: 9.72
№87
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 41.53
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 9.66
№88
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 36.88
TTFR rankings: 356
Ratio Superior: 9.65
№89
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 66.97
TTFR rankings: 635
Ratio Superior: 9.48
№90
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 97.98
TTFR rankings: 928
Ratio Superior: 9.47
№91
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 81.55
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 9.45
№92
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 93.31
TTFR rankings: 881
Ratio Superior: 9.44
№93
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 9.36
№94
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.66
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 9.33
№95
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.25
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 9.3
№96
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.73
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 9.27
№97
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.71
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 9.23
№98
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 60.82
TTFR rankings: 561
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№99
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 77.85
TTFR rankings: 714
Ratio Superior: 9.17
№100
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 79.6
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 9.16
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
