The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.9
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 22.16
№2
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 21.47
№3
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 18.02
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 21.03
№4
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.34
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 19.35
№5
Age: 13
Average rating: 38.8
TTFR rankings: 725
Ratio Superior: 18.69
№6
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 17.9
№7
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.58
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 17.79
№8
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 17.35
№9
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 44.95
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 17.06
№10
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.34
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 17.06
№11
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.02
TTFR rankings: 363
Ratio Superior: 16.49
№12
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 40.01
TTFR rankings: 637
Ratio Superior: 15.92
№13
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.23
TTFR rankings: 433
Ratio Superior: 15.34
№14
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 76.49
TTFR rankings: 1148
Ratio Superior: 15.01
№15
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 65.83
TTFR rankings: 987
Ratio Superior: 14.99
№16
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 57.82
TTFR rankings: 854
Ratio Superior: 14.77
№17
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 14.31
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 14.74
№18
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.58
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 14.7
№19
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 44.95
TTFR rankings: 646
Ratio Superior: 14.37
№20
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.85
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 14.35
№21
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.47
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 14.22
№22
Age: 14
Average rating: 53.05
TTFR rankings: 750
Ratio Superior: 14.14
№23
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 13.96
№24
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 44.95
TTFR rankings: 627
Ratio Superior: 13.95
№25
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.26
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 13.83
№26
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.61
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 13.76
№27
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 55.18
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 13.74
№28
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 327
Ratio Superior: 13.7
№29
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 130.55
TTFR rankings: 1754
Ratio Superior: 13.44
№30
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.6
TTFR rankings: 456
Ratio Superior: 13.18
№31
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 15.21
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 13.08
№32
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.06
TTFR rankings: 561
Ratio Superior: 13.03
№33
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.61
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 13
№34
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 37.67
TTFR rankings: 489
Ratio Superior: 12.98
№35
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.03
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 12.92
№36
Age: 14
Average rating: 53.05
TTFR rankings: 684
Ratio Superior: 12.89
№37
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 37.67
TTFR rankings: 482
Ratio Superior: 12.8
№38
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 16.05
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 12.77
№39
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.49
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 12.72
№40
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.58
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 12.63
№41
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 59.59
TTFR rankings: 749
Ratio Superior: 12.57
№42
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 62.8
TTFR rankings: 763
Ratio Superior: 12.15
№43
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.26
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 12.03
№44
Age: 15
Average rating: 72.29
TTFR rankings: 869
Ratio Superior: 12.02
№45
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 109.8
TTFR rankings: 1318
Ratio Superior: 12
№46
Age: 15
Average rating: 72.29
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 11.98
№47
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.47
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 11.97
№48
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 55.18
TTFR rankings: 659
Ratio Superior: 11.94
№49
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.61
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 11.93
№50
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 37.67
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 11.87
№51
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 50.62
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 11.77
№52
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.23
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 11.65
№53
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.62
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 11.62
№54
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 68.09
TTFR rankings: 789
Ratio Superior: 11.59
№55
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 76.49
TTFR rankings: 884
Ratio Superior: 11.56
№56
Age: 17
Average rating: 140.42
TTFR rankings: 1616
Ratio Superior: 11.51
№57
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.5
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№58
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 89.18
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 11.48
№59
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 126.09
TTFR rankings: 1438
Ratio Superior: 11.4
№60
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.47
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 11.39
№61
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.03
TTFR rankings: 350
Ratio Superior: 11.28
№62
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.47
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№63
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 28.93
TTFR rankings: 322
Ratio Superior: 11.13
№64
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.03
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 11.09
№65
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 60.69
TTFR rankings: 672
Ratio Superior: 11.07
№66
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.23
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 10.98
№67
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 10.98
№68
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 69.85
TTFR rankings: 765
Ratio Superior: 10.95
№69
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.26
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 10.93
№70
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 89.18
TTFR rankings: 972
Ratio Superior: 10.9
№71
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 47.9
TTFR rankings: 521
Ratio Superior: 10.88
№72
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.34
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 10.87
№73
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 41.36
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 10.71
№74
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.85
TTFR rankings: 335
Ratio Superior: 10.52
№75
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 66.61
TTFR rankings: 699
Ratio Superior: 10.49
№76
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.49
TTFR rankings: 382
Ratio Superior: 10.47
№77
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 50.62
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 10.45
№78
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 10.39
№79
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.34
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№80
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 45.79
TTFR rankings: 470
Ratio Superior: 10.26
№81
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.26
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 10.09
№82
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.58
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 10.09
№83
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 89.18
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 10.07
№84
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 89.18
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 10.07
№85
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 56.67
TTFR rankings: 566
Ratio Superior: 9.99
№86
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 44.95
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 9.88
№87
Age: 16
Average rating: 100.49
TTFR rankings: 991
Ratio Superior: 9.86
№88
Age: 10
Average rating: 16.14
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 9.85
№89
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 41.36
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 9.84
№90
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 76.49
TTFR rankings: 749
Ratio Superior: 9.79
№91
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.85
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 9.76
№92
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 9.76
№93
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 103.59
TTFR rankings: 1009
Ratio Superior: 9.74
№94
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 16.33
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 9.74
№95
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 40.01
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 9.65
№96
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 65.83
TTFR rankings: 635
Ratio Superior: 9.65
№97
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 35.34
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 9.62
№98
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 45.79
TTFR rankings: 439
Ratio Superior: 9.59
№99
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 80.47
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 9.58
№100
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 92.22
TTFR rankings: 881
Ratio Superior: 9.55
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
