The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.81
TTFR rankings: 522
Ratio Superior: 26.35
№2
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.11
TTFR rankings: 402
Ratio Superior: 23.5
№3
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.04
TTFR rankings: 1582
Ratio Superior: 22.27
№4
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.94
TTFR rankings: 847
Ratio Superior: 20.2
№5
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 73.02
TTFR rankings: 1400
Ratio Superior: 19.17
№6
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.82
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 18.89
№7
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.14
TTFR rankings: 907
Ratio Superior: 18.09
№8
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.32
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 17.3
№9
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.62
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 16.82
№10
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 11.2
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 16.7
№11
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.83
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 16.4
№12
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.11
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 16.36
№13
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.55
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 15.84
№14
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 68.44
TTFR rankings: 1082
Ratio Superior: 15.81
№15
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.83
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 15.32
№16
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.08
TTFR rankings: 589
Ratio Superior: 15.07
№17
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.45
TTFR rankings: 1309
Ratio Superior: 14.97
№18
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.14
TTFR rankings: 737
Ratio Superior: 14.7
№19
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.18
TTFR rankings: 437
Ratio Superior: 14.48
№20
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 11.81
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 14.48
№21
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.82
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 14.44
№22
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.49
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 14.31
№23
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 10.58
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 14.27
№24
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 11.5
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 14.26
№25
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 8.74
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 14.19
№26
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.14
TTFR rankings: 703
Ratio Superior: 14.02
№27
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.82
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 13.9
№28
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.41
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 13.86
№29
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 12.45
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 13.57
№30
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.44
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 13.56
№31
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.81
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 13.23
№32
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 12.45
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 13.17
№33
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.5
TTFR rankings: 586
Ratio Superior: 13.17
№34
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 9.06
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№35
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.19
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 13.01
№36
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.96
TTFR rankings: 415
Ratio Superior: 12.59
№37
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.62
TTFR rankings: 322
Ratio Superior: 12.57
№38
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 12.49
№39
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.62
TTFR rankings: 320
Ratio Superior: 12.49
№40
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.8
TTFR rankings: 692
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№41
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.45
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 12.27
№42
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.45
TTFR rankings: 1072
Ratio Superior: 12.26
№43
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.99
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 12.23
№44
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.47
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 12.08
№45
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.3
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 11.76
№46
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 15.65
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 11.76
№47
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.04
TTFR rankings: 702
Ratio Superior: 11.69
№48
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.94
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 11.68
№49
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 111.06
TTFR rankings: 1286
Ratio Superior: 11.58
№50
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.14
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 11.57
№51
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 134.37
TTFR rankings: 1530
Ratio Superior: 11.39
№52
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.37
TTFR rankings: 229
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№53
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.45
TTFR rankings: 964
Ratio Superior: 11.02
№54
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.06
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 11.02
№55
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.18
TTFR rankings: 695
Ratio Superior: 11
№56
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 383
Ratio Superior: 10.9
№57
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.41
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 10.72
№58
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.56
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 10.68
№59
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.68
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 10.64
№60
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.56
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 10.58
№61
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 13.81
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 10.57
№62
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.47
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 10.56
№63
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 129.11
TTFR rankings: 1361
Ratio Superior: 10.54
№64
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.3
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 10.52
№65
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.65
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 10.46
№66
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 10.43
№67
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.32
TTFR rankings: 597
Ratio Superior: 10.42
№68
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 11.81
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 10.41
№69
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.09
TTFR rankings: 375
Ratio Superior: 10.39
№70
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 106.36
TTFR rankings: 1105
Ratio Superior: 10.39
№71
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.56
TTFR rankings: 327
Ratio Superior: 10.36
№72
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.37
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 10.3
№73
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 10.74
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 10.24
№74
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 13.81
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 10.21
№75
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.82
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 10.05
№76
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.56
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 10.04
№77
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.6
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 9.89
№78
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.83
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 9.88
№79
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.62
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 9.88
№80
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.93
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 9.86
№81
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.78
TTFR rankings: 1200
Ratio Superior: 9.85
№82
Age: 17
Average rating: 153.94
TTFR rankings: 1508
Ratio Superior: 9.8
№83
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.07
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 9.68
№84
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.96
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 9.65
№85
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.21
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 9.64
№86
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 13.81
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 9.63
№87
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.49
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 9.63
№88
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 10.09
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 9.61
№89
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 77.83
TTFR rankings: 748
Ratio Superior: 9.61
№90
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.56
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 9.54
№91
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.62
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 9.41
№92
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.21
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 9.36
№93
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 13.81
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 9.34
№94
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 183.91
TTFR rankings: 1713
Ratio Superior: 9.31
№95
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.44
TTFR rankings: 939
Ratio Superior: 9.26
№96
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 94.87
TTFR rankings: 876
Ratio Superior: 9.23
№97
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.37
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 9.23
№98
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.49
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№99
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 10.09
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№100
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 77.83
TTFR rankings: 717
Ratio Superior: 9.21
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
