The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
101
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 32.1
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 7.63
102
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.23
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 7.63
103
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 53.4
TTFR rankings: 405
Ratio Superior: 7.58
104
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.04
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 7.57
105
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 7.56
106
Age: 14
Average rating: 74.64
TTFR rankings: 562
Ratio Superior: 7.53
107
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 62.06
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 7.48
108
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 569
Ratio Superior: 7.45
109
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 124.58
TTFR rankings: 926
Ratio Superior: 7.43
110
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 67.72
TTFR rankings: 503
Ratio Superior: 7.43
111
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.06
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 7.43
112
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 116.26
TTFR rankings: 863
Ratio Superior: 7.42
113
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.62
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 7.4
114
Age: 13
Average rating: 49.35
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 7.29
115
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 14.11
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 7.23
116
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 45.12
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 7.2
117
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 7.18
118
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 29.17
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 7.16
119
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 256.25
TTFR rankings: 1828
Ratio Superior: 7.13
120
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 98.39
TTFR rankings: 700
Ratio Superior: 7.11
121
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 118.22
TTFR rankings: 841
Ratio Superior: 7.11
122
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 7.08
123
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.73
TTFR rankings: 387
Ratio Superior: 7.07
124
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 72.28
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 7.04
125
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 83.38
TTFR rankings: 585
Ratio Superior: 7.02
126
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.4
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 7.01
127
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 25.06
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 6.94
128
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 268.9
TTFR rankings: 1852
Ratio Superior: 6.89
129
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 6.88
130
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 154.87
TTFR rankings: 1064
Ratio Superior: 6.87
131
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 39.32
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 6.87
132
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 6.87
133
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 41.76
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 6.85
134
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.6
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.81
135
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 100.65
TTFR rankings: 685
Ratio Superior: 6.81
136
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 85.27
TTFR rankings: 576
Ratio Superior: 6.76
137
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 6.73
138
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 139.18
TTFR rankings: 936
Ratio Superior: 6.73
139
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 227.33
TTFR rankings: 1528
Ratio Superior: 6.72
140
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 121.56
TTFR rankings: 810
Ratio Superior: 6.66
141
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.54
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.65
142
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 116.26
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 6.63
143
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 47.81
TTFR rankings: 316
Ratio Superior: 6.61
144
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.35
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 6.59
145
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.54
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 6.57
146
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 87.37
TTFR rankings: 574
Ratio Superior: 6.57
147
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 60.83
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 6.56
148
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 79.65
TTFR rankings: 520
Ratio Superior: 6.53
149
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.48
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 6.52
150
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 169.21
TTFR rankings: 1103
Ratio Superior: 6.52
151
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 6.45
152
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 191.27
TTFR rankings: 1233
Ratio Superior: 6.45
153
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.91
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 6.44
154
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 159.83
TTFR rankings: 1028
Ratio Superior: 6.43
155
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.84
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 6.42
156
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 6.39
157
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 67.72
TTFR rankings: 432
Ratio Superior: 6.38
158
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 14.11
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.38
159
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.32
160
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 196.73
TTFR rankings: 1243
Ratio Superior: 6.32
161
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 134.38
TTFR rankings: 848
Ratio Superior: 6.31
162
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 33.96
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 6.3
163
Age: 17
Average rating: 176.69
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 6.28
164
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 223.97
TTFR rankings: 1406
Ratio Superior: 6.28
165
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 37.28
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 6.28
166
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.48
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 6.27
167
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.6
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 6.27
168
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 28.46
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 6.25
169
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.25
170
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 6.23
171
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 174.79
TTFR rankings: 1086
Ratio Superior: 6.21
172
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 301.25
TTFR rankings: 1860
Ratio Superior: 6.17
173
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 106.49
TTFR rankings: 656
Ratio Superior: 6.16
174
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 39.32
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 6.13
175
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 81.1
TTFR rankings: 497
Ratio Superior: 6.13
176
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 93.07
TTFR rankings: 566
Ratio Superior: 6.08
177
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 32.1
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 6.01
178
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.31
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 6.01
179
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 139.18
TTFR rankings: 833
Ratio Superior: 5.99
180
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 67.72
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 5.97
181
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 5.95
182
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 39.32
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 5.95
183
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 5.92
184
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 51.83
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 5.9
185
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 29.17
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 5.9
186
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 130.34
TTFR rankings: 764
Ratio Superior: 5.86
187
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 183.32
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 5.85
188
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 90.39
TTFR rankings: 528
Ratio Superior: 5.84
189
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 126.89
TTFR rankings: 734
Ratio Superior: 5.78
190
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 5.78
191
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 46.9
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 5.78
192
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 203.73
TTFR rankings: 1171
Ratio Superior: 5.75
193
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 244.99
TTFR rankings: 1391
Ratio Superior: 5.68
194
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.35
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 5.67
195
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 207.82
TTFR rankings: 1173
Ratio Superior: 5.64
196
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.64
197
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.04
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 5.63
198
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 37.28
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 5.63
199
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 14.56
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 5.63
200
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 142.37
TTFR rankings: 799
Ratio Superior: 5.61

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников