The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 24.21
TTFR rankings: 775
Ratio Superior: 32.01
№2
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 26.84
TTFR rankings: 709
Ratio Superior: 26.42
№3
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 29.62
TTFR rankings: 647
Ratio Superior: 21.84
№4
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 23.31
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 21.66
№5
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.55
TTFR rankings: 1721
Ratio Superior: 21.63
№6
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.5
TTFR rankings: 1256
Ratio Superior: 21.47
№7
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.61
TTFR rankings: 1149
Ratio Superior: 21.04
№8
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 22.45
TTFR rankings: 469
Ratio Superior: 20.89
№9
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 20.35
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 20.34
№10
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.68
TTFR rankings: 775
Ratio Superior: 20.04
№11
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.6
TTFR rankings: 724
Ratio Superior: 19.26
№12
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 18.61
№13
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.87
TTFR rankings: 829
Ratio Superior: 18.07
№14
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.85
TTFR rankings: 647
Ratio Superior: 18.05
№15
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 26.84
TTFR rankings: 475
Ratio Superior: 17.7
№16
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 18.69
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 17.55
№17
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 21.98
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 16.38
№18
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 41.96
TTFR rankings: 664
Ratio Superior: 15.82
№19
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.06
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 15.38
№20
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 65.85
TTFR rankings: 1007
Ratio Superior: 15.29
№21
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 21.22
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 13.85
№22
Age: 11
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 13.73
№23
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.73
TTFR rankings: 459
Ratio Superior: 13.61
№24
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.97
TTFR rankings: 1128
Ratio Superior: 13.43
№25
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.43
TTFR rankings: 593
Ratio Superior: 13.35
№26
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.85
TTFR rankings: 466
Ratio Superior: 13
№27
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.85
TTFR rankings: 462
Ratio Superior: 12.89
№28
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.43
TTFR rankings: 1109
Ratio Superior: 12.68
№29
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.61
TTFR rankings: 931
Ratio Superior: 12.48
№30
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.43
TTFR rankings: 547
Ratio Superior: 12.31
№31
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 11.92
№32
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.28
TTFR rankings: 1154
Ratio Superior: 11.74
№33
Age: 12
Average rating: 30.82
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 11.58
№34
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 11.56
№35
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 49.89
TTFR rankings: 560
Ratio Superior: 11.22
№36
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 21.66
TTFR rankings: 243
Ratio Superior: 11.22
№37
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 32.06
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№38
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 28.89
TTFR rankings: 316
Ratio Superior: 10.94
№39
Age: 16
Average rating: 108.56
TTFR rankings: 1150
Ratio Superior: 10.59
№40
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 17.5
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 10.57
№41
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 10.48
№42
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 481
Ratio Superior: 10.28
№43
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.24
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 10.25
№44
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.56
TTFR rankings: 686
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№45
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.61
TTFR rankings: 543
Ratio Superior: 9.94
№46
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.28
TTFR rankings: 969
Ratio Superior: 9.86
№47
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.61
TTFR rankings: 735
Ratio Superior: 9.85
№48
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 27.54
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 9.8
№49
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.68
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 9.77
№50
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 174.24
TTFR rankings: 1701
Ratio Superior: 9.76
№51
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.6
TTFR rankings: 552
Ratio Superior: 9.75
№52
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 20.35
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 9.73
№53
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 36.6
TTFR rankings: 356
Ratio Superior: 9.73
№54
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 201.43
TTFR rankings: 1931
Ratio Superior: 9.59
№55
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 24.21
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 9.58
№56
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 51.56
TTFR rankings: 493
Ratio Superior: 9.56
№57
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 21.22
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 9.52
№58
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 25.19
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 9.49
№59
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 27.54
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 9.48
№60
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.67
TTFR rankings: 764
Ratio Superior: 9.47
№61
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.06
TTFR rankings: 374
Ratio Superior: 9.34
№62
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.53
TTFR rankings: 322
Ratio Superior: 9.33
№63
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.55
TTFR rankings: 741
Ratio Superior: 9.31
№64
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 32.06
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 9.2
№65
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 9.09
№66
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.55
TTFR rankings: 703
Ratio Superior: 8.84
№67
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 17.36
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 8.81
№68
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.21
TTFR rankings: 611
Ratio Superior: 8.7
№69
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 127.58
TTFR rankings: 1102
Ratio Superior: 8.64
№70
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 8.59
№71
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 32.06
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 8.58
№72
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 150.21
TTFR rankings: 1288
Ratio Superior: 8.57
№73
Age: 9
Average rating: 16.26
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 8.55
№74
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.68
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 8.48
№75
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 28.07
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 8.48
№76
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.44
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 8.47
№77
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.87
TTFR rankings: 385
Ratio Superior: 8.39
№78
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 190.44
TTFR rankings: 1570
Ratio Superior: 8.24
№79
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 26.84
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 8.23
№80
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 49.89
TTFR rankings: 409
Ratio Superior: 8.2
№81
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.47
TTFR rankings: 429
Ratio Superior: 8.18
№82
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 76.52
TTFR rankings: 625
Ratio Superior: 8.17
№83
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 22.45
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 8.15
№84
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 24.21
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 8.14
№85
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 27.54
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 8.1
№86
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 8.09
№87
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.43
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 8.04
№88
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 21.66
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 8.03
№89
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 27.54
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 7.99
№90
Age: 12
Average rating: 30.82
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 7.98
№91
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 25.19
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 7.98
№92
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.6
TTFR rankings: 449
Ratio Superior: 7.93
№93
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 24.21
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 7.93
№94
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 20.56
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 7.93
№95
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.87
TTFR rankings: 363
Ratio Superior: 7.91
№96
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.47
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 7.89
№97
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 92.66
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 7.87
№98
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 163.66
TTFR rankings: 1287
Ratio Superior: 7.86
№99
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.6
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 7.84
№100
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 22.45
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 7.84
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
