The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 829
Ratio Superior: 31.95
№2
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 29.24
TTFR rankings: 749
Ratio Superior: 25.62
№3
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 24.34
TTFR rankings: 594
Ratio Superior: 24.4
№4
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.08
TTFR rankings: 1000
Ratio Superior: 23.76
№5
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.33
TTFR rankings: 1454
Ratio Superior: 23.71
№6
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 19.96
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 23.25
№7
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.76
TTFR rankings: 1155
Ratio Superior: 22.31
№8
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.96
TTFR rankings: 904
Ratio Superior: 22.07
№9
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 514
Ratio Superior: 21.54
№10
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 21.83
TTFR rankings: 459
Ratio Superior: 21.03
№11
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 25.09
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 20.57
№12
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.22
TTFR rankings: 1688
Ratio Superior: 20.28
№13
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 32.56
TTFR rankings: 655
Ratio Superior: 20.12
№14
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 49.39
TTFR rankings: 987
Ratio Superior: 19.98
№15
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.38
TTFR rankings: 1145
Ratio Superior: 19.95
№16
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 29.24
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 17.41
№17
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.67
TTFR rankings: 662
Ratio Superior: 16.69
№18
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 22.68
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 16.23
№19
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.29
TTFR rankings: 711
Ratio Superior: 15.7
№20
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.45
TTFR rankings: 680
Ratio Superior: 15.65
№21
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.9
TTFR rankings: 492
Ratio Superior: 15.42
№22
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 68.82
TTFR rankings: 1039
Ratio Superior: 15.1
№23
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.88
TTFR rankings: 701
Ratio Superior: 14.64
№24
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 21.83
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 14.29
№25
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 28.04
TTFR rankings: 400
Ratio Superior: 14.27
№26
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.53
TTFR rankings: 520
Ratio Superior: 14.23
№27
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 23.22
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 14.21
№28
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 30.21
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 13.8
№29
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 73.77
TTFR rankings: 1016
Ratio Superior: 13.77
№30
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 87.33
TTFR rankings: 1202
Ratio Superior: 13.76
№31
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 19.54
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 13.25
№32
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 27.21
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 12.64
№33
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 24.7
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 12.31
№34
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.67
TTFR rankings: 487
Ratio Superior: 12.28
№35
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 12.23
№36
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.29
TTFR rankings: 614
Ratio Superior: 12.21
№37
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.33
TTFR rankings: 463
Ratio Superior: 12.08
№38
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 29.24
TTFR rankings: 347
Ratio Superior: 11.87
№39
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.67
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 11.84
№40
Age: 16
Average rating: 99.35
TTFR rankings: 1176
Ratio Superior: 11.84
№41
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 91.33
TTFR rankings: 1081
Ratio Superior: 11.84
№42
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.88
TTFR rankings: 564
Ratio Superior: 11.78
№43
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 26.56
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 11.71
№44
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 30.21
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 11.52
№45
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№46
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 22.68
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 11.46
№47
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 886
Ratio Superior: 11.4
№48
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.89
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 11.33
№49
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 27.21
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 11.1
№50
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.01
TTFR rankings: 579
Ratio Superior: 10.92
№51
Age: 10
Average rating: 19.49
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 10.88
№52
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 836
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№53
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 73.77
TTFR rankings: 782
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№54
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 17.21
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 10.4
№55
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 70.17
TTFR rankings: 711
Ratio Superior: 10.13
№56
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 111.22
TTFR rankings: 1125
Ratio Superior: 10.12
№57
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 20.55
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 10.07
№58
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 10.06
№59
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 9.98
№60
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.43
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 9.88
№61
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 9.85
№62
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 765
Ratio Superior: 9.84
№63
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 84.4
TTFR rankings: 823
Ratio Superior: 9.75
№64
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.39
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 9.74
№65
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.38
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 9.73
№66
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.08
TTFR rankings: 408
Ratio Superior: 9.7
№67
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 71.57
TTFR rankings: 687
Ratio Superior: 9.6
№68
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.64
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 9.58
№69
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.38
TTFR rankings: 549
Ratio Superior: 9.57
№70
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.19
TTFR rankings: 765
Ratio Superior: 9.54
№71
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.17
TTFR rankings: 1708
Ratio Superior: 9.53
№72
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 203.01
TTFR rankings: 1930
Ratio Superior: 9.51
№73
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.86
TTFR rankings: 569
Ratio Superior: 9.51
№74
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 157.76
TTFR rankings: 1499
Ratio Superior: 9.5
№75
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 29.24
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 9.4
№76
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.22
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 9.38
№77
Age: 12
Average rating: 30.7
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 9.38
№78
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 49.39
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 9.21
№79
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.88
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 9.19
№80
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 9.17
№81
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.67
TTFR rankings: 363
Ratio Superior: 9.15
№82
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 22.08
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 9.06
№83
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 30.21
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 8.9
№84
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.38
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 8.83
№85
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 22.68
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 8.82
№86
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 18.21
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 8.79
№87
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.88
TTFR rankings: 420
Ratio Superior: 8.77
№88
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.96
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 8.72
№89
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 130.03
TTFR rankings: 1133
Ratio Superior: 8.71
№90
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 130.03
TTFR rankings: 1121
Ratio Superior: 8.62
№91
Age: 16
Average rating: 99.35
TTFR rankings: 853
Ratio Superior: 8.59
№92
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.86
TTFR rankings: 512
Ratio Superior: 8.55
№93
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 66.87
TTFR rankings: 570
Ratio Superior: 8.52
№94
Age: 11
Average rating: 22.95
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 8.45
№95
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.64
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 8.41
№96
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 94.21
TTFR rankings: 792
Ratio Superior: 8.41
№97
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 8.38
№98
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 28.04
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 8.31
№99
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.08
TTFR rankings: 349
Ratio Superior: 8.29
№100
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.32
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 8.29
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
