The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 90.3
TTFR rankings: 1639
Ratio Superior: 18.15
№2
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 45.43
TTFR rankings: 719
Ratio Superior: 15.83
№3
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 71.58
TTFR rankings: 1113
Ratio Superior: 15.55
№4
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 67.57
TTFR rankings: 997
Ratio Superior: 14.76
№5
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 782
Ratio Superior: 14.75
№6
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 671
Ratio Superior: 14.56
№7
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 59.67
TTFR rankings: 826
Ratio Superior: 13.84
№8
Age: 14
Average rating: 77.27
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 13.25
№9
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 60.7
TTFR rankings: 788
Ratio Superior: 12.98
№10
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 51.82
TTFR rankings: 668
Ratio Superior: 12.89
№11
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 47.06
TTFR rankings: 594
Ratio Superior: 12.62
№12
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 50.94
TTFR rankings: 628
Ratio Superior: 12.33
№13
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 56.22
TTFR rankings: 664
Ratio Superior: 11.81
№14
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 94.07
TTFR rankings: 1109
Ratio Superior: 11.79
№15
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 54.37
TTFR rankings: 624
Ratio Superior: 11.48
№16
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.12
TTFR rankings: 927
Ratio Superior: 11.02
№17
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 108.58
TTFR rankings: 1176
Ratio Superior: 10.83
№18
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 97.65
TTFR rankings: 1054
Ratio Superior: 10.79
№19
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 63.23
TTFR rankings: 626
Ratio Superior: 9.9
№20
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 45.3
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 9.67
№21
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 49.21
TTFR rankings: 473
Ratio Superior: 9.61
№22
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 120.17
TTFR rankings: 1150
Ratio Superior: 9.57
№23
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 50.94
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 9.05
№24
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 176.88
TTFR rankings: 1586
Ratio Superior: 8.97
№25
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 58
TTFR rankings: 518
Ratio Superior: 8.93
№26
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 45.49
TTFR rankings: 400
Ratio Superior: 8.79
№27
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 108.58
TTFR rankings: 949
Ratio Superior: 8.74
№28
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№29
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 79.97
TTFR rankings: 689
Ratio Superior: 8.62
№30
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 90.3
TTFR rankings: 760
Ratio Superior: 8.42
№31
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 217.71
TTFR rankings: 1823
Ratio Superior: 8.37
№32
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 45.48
TTFR rankings: 373
Ratio Superior: 8.2
№33
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 81.11
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 8.15
№34
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 56.93
TTFR rankings: 460
Ratio Superior: 8.08
№35
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 161.56
TTFR rankings: 1282
Ratio Superior: 7.94
№36
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.12
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 7.86
№37
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 141.03
TTFR rankings: 1102
Ratio Superior: 7.81
№38
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 90.3
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 7.8
№39
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 46.31
TTFR rankings: 361
Ratio Superior: 7.8
№40
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 67.57
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 7.64
№41
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 7.56
№42
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 60.7
TTFR rankings: 453
Ratio Superior: 7.46
№43
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 202.49
TTFR rankings: 1509
Ratio Superior: 7.45
№44
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 134.9
TTFR rankings: 987
Ratio Superior: 7.32
№45
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 50.94
TTFR rankings: 372
Ratio Superior: 7.3
№46
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 91.29
TTFR rankings: 660
Ratio Superior: 7.23
№47
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 239
TTFR rankings: 1720
Ratio Superior: 7.2
№48
Age: 17
Average rating: 173.08
TTFR rankings: 1243
Ratio Superior: 7.18
№49
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 102
TTFR rankings: 731
Ratio Superior: 7.17
№50
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 64.46
TTFR rankings: 454
Ratio Superior: 7.04
№51
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 134.9
TTFR rankings: 946
Ratio Superior: 7.01
№52
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 54.37
TTFR rankings: 374
Ratio Superior: 6.88
№53
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 47.39
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 6.86
№54
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 69.42
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 6.86
№55
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 87.14
TTFR rankings: 597
Ratio Superior: 6.85
№56
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 50.94
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 6.83
№57
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 65.62
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 6.78
№58
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 46.54
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 6.73
№59
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 188.46
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 6.65
№60
Age: 15
Average rating: 99.35
TTFR rankings: 656
Ratio Superior: 6.6
№61
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 65.62
TTFR rankings: 429
Ratio Superior: 6.54
№62
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 69.42
TTFR rankings: 449
Ratio Superior: 6.47
№63
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 91.29
TTFR rankings: 589
Ratio Superior: 6.45
№64
Age: 19
Average rating: 320.2
TTFR rankings: 2032
Ratio Superior: 6.35
№65
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.74
TTFR rankings: 1053
Ratio Superior: 6.28
№66
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 196.67
TTFR rankings: 1234
Ratio Superior: 6.27
№67
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 127.47
TTFR rankings: 798
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№68
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 120.17
TTFR rankings: 747
Ratio Superior: 6.22
№69
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 65.62
TTFR rankings: 403
Ratio Superior: 6.14
№70
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№71
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 63.23
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 6.1
№72
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 227.37
TTFR rankings: 1375
Ratio Superior: 6.05
№73
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 170.44
TTFR rankings: 1027
Ratio Superior: 6.03
№74
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 45.84
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 6.02
№75
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 165.22
TTFR rankings: 993
Ratio Superior: 6.01
№76
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 278.85
TTFR rankings: 1666
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№77
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 69.42
TTFR rankings: 412
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№78
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 95.23
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 5.91
№79
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 74.41
TTFR rankings: 439
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№80
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 75.96
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 5.88
№81
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 67.57
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 5.88
№82
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 48.07
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 5.85
№83
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 69.42
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 5.82
№84
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 111.77
TTFR rankings: 647
Ratio Superior: 5.79
№85
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 120.17
TTFR rankings: 695
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№86
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 48.07
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№87
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 94.07
TTFR rankings: 536
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№88
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 45.3
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№89
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 90.3
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 5.64
№90
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 63.23
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 5.61
№91
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 47.99
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 5.61
№92
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 56.93
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 5.6
№93
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 227.37
TTFR rankings: 1269
Ratio Superior: 5.58
№94
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.74
TTFR rankings: 936
Ratio Superior: 5.58
№95
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 79.97
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 5.55
№96
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 141.03
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 5.54
№97
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 58
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№98
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 188.46
TTFR rankings: 1042
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№99
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 244.94
TTFR rankings: 1354
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№100
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 188.46
TTFR rankings: 1041
Ratio Superior: 5.52
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
