⇧
⇩
 
Сайту нужна Ваша помощь!

Помочь сайту финансово

The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

№
Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
№1
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 39.18
TTFR rankings: 985
Ratio Superior: 25.14
№2
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.7
TTFR rankings: 1267
Ratio Superior: 22.35
№3
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.98
TTFR rankings: 1547
Ratio Superior: 21.79
№4
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 76
TTFR rankings: 1632
Ratio Superior: 21.47
№5
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.03
TTFR rankings: 1127
Ratio Superior: 20.11
№6
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 99.51
TTFR rankings: 1981
Ratio Superior: 19.91
№7
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 66.77
TTFR rankings: 1323
Ratio Superior: 19.81
№8
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 90.82
TTFR rankings: 1718
Ratio Superior: 18.92
№9
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 104.46
TTFR rankings: 1861
Ratio Superior: 17.82
№10
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 69.87
TTFR rankings: 1231
Ratio Superior: 17.62
№11
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 76
TTFR rankings: 1335
Ratio Superior: 17.57
№12
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 97.14
TTFR rankings: 1697
Ratio Superior: 17.47
№13
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 63.12
TTFR rankings: 1077
Ratio Superior: 17.06
№14
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.77
TTFR rankings: 930
Ratio Superior: 16.98
№15
Age: 15
Average rating: 68.2
TTFR rankings: 1158
Ratio Superior: 16.98
№16
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 78.65
TTFR rankings: 1333
Ratio Superior: 16.95
№17
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 95.62
TTFR rankings: 1615
Ratio Superior: 16.89
№18
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 84.62
TTFR rankings: 1429
Ratio Superior: 16.89
№19
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 71.92
TTFR rankings: 1210
Ratio Superior: 16.82
№20
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 80.22
TTFR rankings: 1328
Ratio Superior: 16.55
№21
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 77.61
TTFR rankings: 1243
Ratio Superior: 16.02
№22
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 85.61
TTFR rankings: 1360
Ratio Superior: 15.89
№23
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 60.11
TTFR rankings: 917
Ratio Superior: 15.26
№24
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 129.45
TTFR rankings: 1963
Ratio Superior: 15.16
№25
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.42
TTFR rankings: 724
Ratio Superior: 14.95
№26
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 77.61
TTFR rankings: 1131
Ratio Superior: 14.57
№27
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 89.63
TTFR rankings: 1297
Ratio Superior: 14.47
№28
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 63.12
TTFR rankings: 912
Ratio Superior: 14.45
№29
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.77
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 14.44
№30
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 86.89
TTFR rankings: 1233
Ratio Superior: 14.19
№31
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 82.09
TTFR rankings: 1158
Ratio Superior: 14.11
№32
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 76
TTFR rankings: 1069
Ratio Superior: 14.07
№33
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 83.07
TTFR rankings: 1168
Ratio Superior: 14.06
№34
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 79.61
TTFR rankings: 1104
Ratio Superior: 13.87
№35
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.42
TTFR rankings: 669
Ratio Superior: 13.82
№36
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 92.44
TTFR rankings: 1277
Ratio Superior: 13.81
№37
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 64.93
TTFR rankings: 889
Ratio Superior: 13.69
№38
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 82.09
TTFR rankings: 1118
Ratio Superior: 13.62
№39
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 50.5
TTFR rankings: 686
Ratio Superior: 13.58
№40
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 72.57
TTFR rankings: 983
Ratio Superior: 13.55
№41
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 66.27
TTFR rankings: 884
Ratio Superior: 13.34
№42
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 73.87
TTFR rankings: 967
Ratio Superior: 13.09
№43
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 86.89
TTFR rankings: 1135
Ratio Superior: 13.06
№44
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 82.09
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 12.9
№45
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.37
TTFR rankings: 675
Ratio Superior: 12.89
№46
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.77
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 12.85
№47
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 49.24
TTFR rankings: 626
Ratio Superior: 12.71
№48
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.45
TTFR rankings: 679
Ratio Superior: 12.7
№49
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 46.3
TTFR rankings: 588
Ratio Superior: 12.7
№50
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.45
TTFR rankings: 671
Ratio Superior: 12.55
№51
Age: 16
Average rating: 81
TTFR rankings: 1004
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№52
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 73.87
TTFR rankings: 915
Ratio Superior: 12.39
№53
Age: 17
Average rating: 93.23
TTFR rankings: 1136
Ratio Superior: 12.18
№54
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 49.24
TTFR rankings: 593
Ratio Superior: 12.04
№55
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 51
TTFR rankings: 614
Ratio Superior: 12.04
№56
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 77.61
TTFR rankings: 931
Ratio Superior: 12
№57
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 95.62
TTFR rankings: 1146
Ratio Superior: 11.98
№58
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 42.19
TTFR rankings: 500
Ratio Superior: 11.85
№59
Age: 11
Average rating: 38.23
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 11.61
№60
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.7
TTFR rankings: 648
Ratio Superior: 11.43
№61
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 92.44
TTFR rankings: 1052
Ratio Superior: 11.38
№62
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 89.63
TTFR rankings: 1015
Ratio Superior: 11.32
№63
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 89.63
TTFR rankings: 1014
Ratio Superior: 11.31
№64
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 100.68
TTFR rankings: 1129
Ratio Superior: 11.21
№65
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 101.8
TTFR rankings: 1140
Ratio Superior: 11.2
№66
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 79.61
TTFR rankings: 869
Ratio Superior: 10.92
№67
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 100.68
TTFR rankings: 1096
Ratio Superior: 10.89
№68
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.98
TTFR rankings: 760
Ratio Superior: 10.71
№69
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 50.5
TTFR rankings: 539
Ratio Superior: 10.67
№70
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 78.65
TTFR rankings: 834
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№71
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 69.11
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 10.5
№72
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 58.64
TTFR rankings: 614
Ratio Superior: 10.47
№73
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 51.62
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 10.36
№74
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 60.11
TTFR rankings: 622
Ratio Superior: 10.35
№75
Age: 17
Average rating: 93.23
TTFR rankings: 962
Ratio Superior: 10.32
№76
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 63.99
TTFR rankings: 660
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№77
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 83.07
TTFR rankings: 853
Ratio Superior: 10.27
№78
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.98
TTFR rankings: 727
Ratio Superior: 10.24
№79
Age: 16
Average rating: 81
TTFR rankings: 825
Ratio Superior: 10.19
№80
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 83.07
TTFR rankings: 844
Ratio Superior: 10.16
№81
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 92.4
TTFR rankings: 930
Ratio Superior: 10.06
№82
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 114.27
TTFR rankings: 1144
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№83
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 95.62
TTFR rankings: 948
Ratio Superior: 9.91
№84
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 40.36
TTFR rankings: 400
Ratio Superior: 9.91
№85
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 174.67
TTFR rankings: 1731
Ratio Superior: 9.91
№86
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 66.27
TTFR rankings: 656
Ratio Superior: 9.9
№87
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 63.99
TTFR rankings: 630
Ratio Superior: 9.85
№88
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 62.02
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 9.84
№89
Age: 11
Average rating: 38.23
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 9.84
№90
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 58.64
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 9.77
№91
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.22
TTFR rankings: 536
Ratio Superior: 9.71
№92
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 72.57
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 9.7
№93
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 76
TTFR rankings: 735
Ratio Superior: 9.67
№94
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 95.62
TTFR rankings: 920
Ratio Superior: 9.62
№95
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 64.93
TTFR rankings: 622
Ratio Superior: 9.58
№96
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 71.92
TTFR rankings: 688
Ratio Superior: 9.57
№97
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 60.11
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 9.57
№98
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 93.87
TTFR rankings: 895
Ratio Superior: 9.53
№99
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 46.56
TTFR rankings: 441
Ratio Superior: 9.47
№100
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 43.43
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 9.46

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников