The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.39
TTFR rankings: 1247
Ratio Superior: 25.25
№2
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.88
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 22.99
№3
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.16
TTFR rankings: 666
Ratio Superior: 22.84
№4
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.25
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 20.28
№5
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 57.13
TTFR rankings: 1094
Ratio Superior: 19.15
№6
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.41
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 18.91
№7
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 47.18
TTFR rankings: 863
Ratio Superior: 18.29
№8
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.81
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 16.84
№9
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.6
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 15.71
№10
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.78
TTFR rankings: 621
Ratio Superior: 15.61
№11
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 15.54
№12
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 101.89
TTFR rankings: 1549
Ratio Superior: 15.2
№13
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.81
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 15.16
№14
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.4
TTFR rankings: 938
Ratio Superior: 14.79
№15
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.77
TTFR rankings: 1251
Ratio Superior: 14.76
№16
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 111.57
TTFR rankings: 1623
Ratio Superior: 14.55
№17
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 57.13
TTFR rankings: 827
Ratio Superior: 14.48
№18
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.18
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 13.82
№19
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 122.64
TTFR rankings: 1691
Ratio Superior: 13.79
№20
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.6
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 13.76
№21
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.14
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 13.09
№22
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.14
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 12.75
№23
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.19
TTFR rankings: 1020
Ratio Superior: 12.41
№24
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.7
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 12.32
№25
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 72.61
TTFR rankings: 889
Ratio Superior: 12.24
№26
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.51
TTFR rankings: 392
Ratio Superior: 12.06
№27
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.49
TTFR rankings: 1136
Ratio Superior: 11.65
№28
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 69.06
TTFR rankings: 804
Ratio Superior: 11.64
№29
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.78
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 11.59
№30
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.39
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 11.42
№31
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.27
TTFR rankings: 993
Ratio Superior: 11.38
№32
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.54
TTFR rankings: 1070
Ratio Superior: 11.32
№33
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.28
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№34
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.61
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 11.17
№35
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.7
TTFR rankings: 510
Ratio Superior: 11.16
№36
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.7
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 11.01
№37
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.18
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 10.96
№38
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.78
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№39
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.76
TTFR rankings: 432
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№40
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.86
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 10.29
№41
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 167.1
TTFR rankings: 1691
Ratio Superior: 10.12
№42
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.83
TTFR rankings: 522
Ratio Superior: 10.07
№43
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 768
Ratio Superior: 10.05
№44
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.86
TTFR rankings: 536
Ratio Superior: 9.95
№45
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.51
TTFR rankings: 572
Ratio Superior: 9.61
№46
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.76
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 9.52
№47
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.78
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 9.42
№48
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.19
TTFR rankings: 774
Ratio Superior: 9.42
№49
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.45
TTFR rankings: 733
Ratio Superior: 9.34
№50
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 9.33
№51
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.39
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 9.27
№52
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 20.57
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 9.24
№53
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.7
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 9.03
№54
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.78
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 9.02
№55
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.51
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 9.02
№56
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.51
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 8.96
№57
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.54
TTFR rankings: 844
Ratio Superior: 8.93
№58
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.83
TTFR rankings: 459
Ratio Superior: 8.86
№59
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 8.83
№60
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.25
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 8.81
№61
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 137.58
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 8.81
№62
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 89.42
TTFR rankings: 787
Ratio Superior: 8.8
№63
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.39
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 8.79
№64
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.44
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 8.78
№65
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 8.73
№66
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 61.92
TTFR rankings: 536
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№67
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.61
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№68
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.14
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 8.61
№69
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 69.06
TTFR rankings: 583
Ratio Superior: 8.44
№70
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.27
TTFR rankings: 733
Ratio Superior: 8.4
№71
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.79
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 8.29
№72
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 180.66
TTFR rankings: 1496
Ratio Superior: 8.28
№73
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 8.17
№74
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.14
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 8.16
№75
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 158.85
TTFR rankings: 1291
Ratio Superior: 8.13
№76
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 145.65
TTFR rankings: 1180
Ratio Superior: 8.1
№77
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.16
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 8.09
№78
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.6
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 8.05
№79
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.39
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 7.95
№80
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.34
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 7.93
№81
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.68
TTFR rankings: 527
Ratio Superior: 7.9
№82
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.7
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 7.9
№83
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.86
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 7.89
№84
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.24
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 7.86
№85
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.75
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 7.8
№86
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.79
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 7.78
№87
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.44
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 7.73
№88
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.85
TTFR rankings: 292
Ratio Superior: 7.71
№89
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 186.55
TTFR rankings: 1439
Ratio Superior: 7.71
№90
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.14
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 7.71
№91
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.68
TTFR rankings: 507
Ratio Superior: 7.6
№92
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.41
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 7.57
№93
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.7
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 7.57
№94
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.08
TTFR rankings: 747
Ratio Superior: 7.54
№95
Age: 15
Average rating: 104.16
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 7.5
№96
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 65.01
TTFR rankings: 483
Ratio Superior: 7.43
№97
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.28
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 7.37
№98
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 74.88
TTFR rankings: 552
Ratio Superior: 7.37
№99
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 7.35
№100
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 61.92
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 7.35
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
