The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 31.39
TTFR rankings: 1027
Ratio Superior: 32.72
№2
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 21.82
TTFR rankings: 676
Ratio Superior: 30.98
№3
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 36.39
TTFR rankings: 921
Ratio Superior: 25.31
№4
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 28.55
TTFR rankings: 652
Ratio Superior: 22.84
№5
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 27.58
TTFR rankings: 625
Ratio Superior: 22.66
№6
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.37
TTFR rankings: 1218
Ratio Superior: 22.4
№7
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 640
Ratio Superior: 21.27
№8
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 40.51
TTFR rankings: 786
Ratio Superior: 19.4
№9
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.35
TTFR rankings: 1501
Ratio Superior: 18.92
№10
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 24.78
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 18.44
№11
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 73.09
TTFR rankings: 1320
Ratio Superior: 18.06
№12
Age: 14
Average rating: 65.34
TTFR rankings: 1167
Ratio Superior: 17.86
№13
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.02
TTFR rankings: 463
Ratio Superior: 17.79
№14
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 36.39
TTFR rankings: 646
Ratio Superior: 17.75
№15
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.98
TTFR rankings: 1093
Ratio Superior: 17.35
№16
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.66
TTFR rankings: 912
Ratio Superior: 17.32
№17
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.23
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 16.53
№18
Age: 12
Average rating: 33.15
TTFR rankings: 532
Ratio Superior: 16.05
№19
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 106.94
TTFR rankings: 1640
Ratio Superior: 15.34
№20
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.97
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 14.3
№21
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 14.09
№22
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 13.91
№23
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 13.88
№24
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 29.34
TTFR rankings: 405
Ratio Superior: 13.8
№25
Age: 10
Average rating: 19.41
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 13.7
№26
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 39.57
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 13.67
№27
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.1
TTFR rankings: 820
Ratio Superior: 13.42
№28
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 24.12
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 13.31
№29
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.02
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 13.14
№30
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.32
TTFR rankings: 733
Ratio Superior: 13.01
№31
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.12
TTFR rankings: 637
Ratio Superior: 12.97
№32
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 93.18
TTFR rankings: 1208
Ratio Superior: 12.96
№33
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 46.34
TTFR rankings: 598
Ratio Superior: 12.9
№34
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 12.81
№35
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.84
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 12.79
№36
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 44.28
TTFR rankings: 550
Ratio Superior: 12.42
№37
Age: 15
Average rating: 88.3
TTFR rankings: 1093
Ratio Superior: 12.38
№38
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 116.16
TTFR rankings: 1405
Ratio Superior: 12.1
№39
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.1
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 11.93
№40
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 18.12
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 11.64
№41
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 19.73
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 11.25
№42
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 25.1
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 11.08
№43
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 37.49
TTFR rankings: 415
Ratio Superior: 11.07
№44
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 37.49
TTFR rankings: 402
Ratio Superior: 10.72
№45
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 31.39
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 10.54
№46
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 10.45
№47
Age: 14
Average rating: 65.34
TTFR rankings: 672
Ratio Superior: 10.28
№48
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.14
TTFR rankings: 792
Ratio Superior: 10.27
№49
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.97
TTFR rankings: 508
Ratio Superior: 9.97
№50
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 32.13
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 9.9
№51
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 9.81
№52
Age: 16
Average rating: 122.71
TTFR rankings: 1199
Ratio Superior: 9.77
№53
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 44.28
TTFR rankings: 428
Ratio Superior: 9.67
№54
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 70.83
TTFR rankings: 684
Ratio Superior: 9.66
№55
Age: 8
Average rating: 18.89
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 9.63
№56
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.28
TTFR rankings: 944
Ratio Superior: 9.61
№57
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 37.49
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 9.58
№58
Age: 12
Average rating: 33.15
TTFR rankings: 316
Ratio Superior: 9.53
№59
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 31.39
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 9.49
№60
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 68.38
TTFR rankings: 643
Ratio Superior: 9.4
№61
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 24.78
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 9.4
№62
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.97
TTFR rankings: 473
Ratio Superior: 9.28
№63
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 20.84
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 9.26
№64
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.28
TTFR rankings: 903
Ratio Superior: 9.19
№65
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.12
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 9.16
№66
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 93.18
TTFR rankings: 850
Ratio Superior: 9.12
№67
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 31.39
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 9.08
№68
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 133.47
TTFR rankings: 1210
Ratio Superior: 9.07
№69
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 73.09
TTFR rankings: 662
Ratio Superior: 9.06
№70
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 9.06
№71
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 44.28
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 8.99
№72
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.02
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 8.95
№73
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 31.39
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 8.86
№74
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 8.81
№75
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.35
TTFR rankings: 696
Ratio Superior: 8.77
№76
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 70.83
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 8.74
№77
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 28.55
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 8.72
№78
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 36.39
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 8.71
№79
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 23.09
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 8.71
№80
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 68.38
TTFR rankings: 595
Ratio Superior: 8.7
№81
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 66.5
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 8.69
№82
Age: 12
Average rating: 33.15
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 8.69
№83
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 68.38
TTFR rankings: 592
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№84
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 39.57
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 8.64
№85
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 20.28
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 8.58
№86
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.32
TTFR rankings: 483
Ratio Superior: 8.58
№87
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 233.35
TTFR rankings: 1995
Ratio Superior: 8.55
№88
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 40.51
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 8.42
№89
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 194.42
TTFR rankings: 1631
Ratio Superior: 8.39
№90
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 106.94
TTFR rankings: 894
Ratio Superior: 8.36
№91
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 44.28
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 8.36
№92
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 144.97
TTFR rankings: 1209
Ratio Superior: 8.34
№93
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 27.58
TTFR rankings: 229
Ratio Superior: 8.3
№94
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 21.34
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 8.29
№95
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 39.57
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 8.29
№96
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 36.39
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 8.19
№97
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 93.18
TTFR rankings: 761
Ratio Superior: 8.17
№98
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 8.14
№99
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.1
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 8.09
№100
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 209.45
TTFR rankings: 1691
Ratio Superior: 8.07
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
