The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 9.81
TTFR rankings: 410
Ratio Superior: 41.79
№2
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.8
TTFR rankings: 1137
Ratio Superior: 30.08
№3
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 1263
Ratio Superior: 28.81
№4
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.6
TTFR rankings: 702
Ratio Superior: 28.54
№5
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.77
TTFR rankings: 1280
Ratio Superior: 24.72
№6
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 586
Ratio Superior: 24.56
№7
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.42
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 24.24
№8
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.32
TTFR rankings: 886
Ratio Superior: 22.53
№9
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.3
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 22.2
№10
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 11.88
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 21.3
№11
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 41.81
TTFR rankings: 821
Ratio Superior: 19.64
№12
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 429
Ratio Superior: 19.34
№13
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.42
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 19.31
№14
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.18
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 19.24
№15
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.18
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 17.96
№16
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 77.02
TTFR rankings: 1358
Ratio Superior: 17.63
№17
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 93.12
TTFR rankings: 1634
Ratio Superior: 17.55
№18
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.3
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 17.11
№19
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.47
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 17.05
№20
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 345
Ratio Superior: 17.04
№21
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.77
TTFR rankings: 850
Ratio Superior: 16.42
№22
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.15
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 16.27
№23
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 16.23
№24
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 57.2
TTFR rankings: 922
Ratio Superior: 16.12
№25
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.66
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 16.1
№26
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 111.61
TTFR rankings: 1771
Ratio Superior: 15.87
№27
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 85.59
TTFR rankings: 1337
Ratio Superior: 15.62
№28
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 15.37
№29
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.33
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 15.07
№30
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.47
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 15.05
№31
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.48
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 15.04
№32
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 102.65
TTFR rankings: 1524
Ratio Superior: 14.85
№33
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 13.34
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 14.69
№34
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 62.31
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 14.41
№35
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.84
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 14.41
№36
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.47
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 14.02
№37
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 12.31
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 13.97
№38
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.6
TTFR rankings: 339
Ratio Superior: 13.78
№39
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 65.21
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 13.77
№40
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 78.93
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 13.59
№41
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.74
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 13.59
№42
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.65
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 13.59
№43
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.57
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 13.55
№44
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 13.53
№45
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.66
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 13.5
№46
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.86
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 13.45
№47
Age: 15
Average rating: 88.56
TTFR rankings: 1187
Ratio Superior: 13.4
№48
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 9.81
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 13.35
№49
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.68
TTFR rankings: 475
Ratio Superior: 13.31
№50
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 74.49
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 13.24
№51
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.33
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 13.12
№52
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№53
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 592
Ratio Superior: 12.84
№54
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.68
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 12.61
№55
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.59
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 12.61
№56
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.65
TTFR rankings: 609
Ratio Superior: 12.52
№57
Age: 9
Average rating: 8.79
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 12.51
№58
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 12.49
№59
Age: 10
Average rating: 12.61
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 12.37
№60
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 12.3
№61
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 12.09
№62
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.84
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 11.83
№63
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 11.62
№64
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.28
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 11.45
№65
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.66
TTFR rankings: 465
Ratio Superior: 11.44
№66
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.48
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 11.29
№67
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.6
TTFR rankings: 773
Ratio Superior: 11.27
№68
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.65
TTFR rankings: 548
Ratio Superior: 11.26
№69
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 11.2
№70
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.74
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 11.17
№71
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.76
TTFR rankings: 343
Ratio Superior: 11.15
№72
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.44
TTFR rankings: 405
Ratio Superior: 11.11
№73
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 70.6
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 11.06
№74
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 54.36
TTFR rankings: 592
Ratio Superior: 10.89
№75
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.28
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 10.85
№76
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 74.49
TTFR rankings: 808
Ratio Superior: 10.85
№77
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.44
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№78
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 472
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№79
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 10.73
№80
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 10.68
№81
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 85.59
TTFR rankings: 912
Ratio Superior: 10.66
№82
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 78.93
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 10.64
№83
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.84
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 10.59
№84
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.66
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 10.59
№85
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.9
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 10.54
№86
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.28
TTFR rankings: 557
Ratio Superior: 10.45
№87
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.84
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 10.43
№88
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 10.41
№89
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.97
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 10.35
№90
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 154.91
TTFR rankings: 1594
Ratio Superior: 10.29
№91
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 10.17
№92
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 10.1
№93
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.44
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 10.05
№94
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 62.31
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 9.93
№95
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 9.87
№96
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 9.83
№97
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 9.8
№98
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 81.19
TTFR rankings: 792
Ratio Superior: 9.75
№99
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.19
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 9.73
№100
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 55.79
TTFR rankings: 542
Ratio Superior: 9.72
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
