The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
701
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.79
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3.21
702
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.65
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 3.2
703
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.74
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.2
704
Age: 17
Average rating: 178.41
TTFR rankings: 571
Ratio Superior: 3.2
705
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 182.68
TTFR rankings: 584
Ratio Superior: 3.2
706
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 361.74
TTFR rankings: 1156
Ratio Superior: 3.2
707
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.22
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.18
708
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.31
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 3.18
709
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.57
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.17
710
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 403.27
TTFR rankings: 1272
Ratio Superior: 3.15
711
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.68
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 3.15
712
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.78
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.15
713
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.07
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 3.14
714
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.92
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.13
715
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.95
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.13
716
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.95
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.13
717
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 85.91
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 3.13
718
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 210.79
TTFR rankings: 660
Ratio Superior: 3.13
719
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.07
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 3.13
720
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.22
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.13
721
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.91
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.13
722
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.91
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.13
723
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.76
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 3.13
724
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.21
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.11
725
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.21
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.11
726
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 118.04
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 3.11
727
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.11
728
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.97
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 3.1
729
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 113.17
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 3.1
730
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 4.52
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 3.1
731
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.53
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 3.09
732
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.35
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.09
733
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.95
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 3.09
734
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.36
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 3.09
735
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.78
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 3.08
736
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.87
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 3.07
737
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.36
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.07
738
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.36
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.07
739
Age: 15
Average rating: 94.56
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 3.07
740
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.53
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 3.06
741
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.31
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.06
742
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.79
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 3.05
743
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 169.34
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 3.05
744
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 200.44
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 3.04
745
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.68
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 3.04
746
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 4.94
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 3.04
747
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.55
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 3.03
748
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.5
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.03
749
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.02
750
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.02
751
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.92
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 3.02
752
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.31
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 3.02
753
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.22
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 3.01
754
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.45
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 3.01
755
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.31
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3
756
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.78
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.99
757
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 121.65
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 2.99
758
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.74
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.99
759
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.47
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.99
760
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.07
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 2.98
761
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.74
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.98
762
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.53
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 2.98
763
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.68
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.97
764
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.48
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.96
765
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.49
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.96
766
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.4
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.95
767
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.9
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.95
768
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.31
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.95
769
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.59
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.95
770
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 125.14
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 2.94
771
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.99
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 2.94
772
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.26
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.93
773
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.26
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.93
774
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 182.68
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 2.93
775
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.93
776
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.91
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.93
777
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.9
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.92
778
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.95
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.92
779
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.46
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 2.92
780
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.23
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.92
781
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.57
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.91
782
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 381.33
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 2.91
783
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 137.08
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.91
784
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.47
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 2.91
785
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.49
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.9
786
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.91
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.89
787
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.35
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 2.88
788
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.5
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.88
789
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.1
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.87
790
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.73
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 2.87
791
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.9
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.87
792
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.46
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 2.87
793
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 90.68
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.87
794
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.33
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 2.87
795
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.86
796
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.87
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 2.86
797
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 149.51
TTFR rankings: 428
Ratio Superior: 2.86
798
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.36
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.86
799
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.31
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 2.86
800
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.76
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.86

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников