The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№601
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.05
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№602
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.91
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№603
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.21
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№604
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.88
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№605
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.21
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№606
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.79
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№607
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.09
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№608
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 106.84
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№609
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 120.79
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№610
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.93
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№611
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.11
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№612
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.38
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№613
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.78
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№614
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№615
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.9
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№616
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.09
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№617
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.86
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№618
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.21
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№619
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.79
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№620
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.98
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№621
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.57
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№622
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.78
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№623
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.68
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№624
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.46
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№625
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.93
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№626
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.99
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№627
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.96
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№628
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.64
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№629
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.23
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№630
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.13
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№631
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.09
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 3.37
№632
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.92
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 3.37
№633
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.93
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 3.37
№634
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.86
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№635
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 201.85
TTFR rankings: 679
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№636
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.76
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№637
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 292.81
TTFR rankings: 983
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№638
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.11
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№639
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.89
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№640
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 116.56
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№641
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.79
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№642
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 146.38
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№643
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.4
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№644
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.1
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№645
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.88
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№646
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 7.86
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№647
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.93
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 3.31
№648
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.68
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 3.3
№649
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.4
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 3.3
№650
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.39
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 3.29
№651
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.1
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 3.29
№652
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.93
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.28
№653
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.31
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 3.27
№654
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.74
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 3.27
№655
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.74
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.27
№656
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.74
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.27
№657
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.64
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№658
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.79
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№659
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.11
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№660
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 131.02
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№661
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 85.61
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№662
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.97
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 3.26
№663
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.02
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 3.25
№664
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.95
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.24
№665
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.45
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.24
№666
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.76
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.24
№667
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 117.45
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 3.24
№668
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 281.37
TTFR rankings: 909
Ratio Superior: 3.23
№669
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.89
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 3.22
№670
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.24
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 3.22
№671
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.39
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№672
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.05
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№673
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.92
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№674
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.8
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№675
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.45
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№676
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.1
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№677
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.88
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№678
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.84
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№679
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.84
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 3.2
№680
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.81
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 3.19
№681
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.79
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.19
№682
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.4
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.18
№683
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.78
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 3.18
№684
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 80.2
TTFR rankings: 255
Ratio Superior: 3.18
№685
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.76
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.17
№686
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 246.24
TTFR rankings: 780
Ratio Superior: 3.17
№687
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 66.66
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 3.17
№688
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 401.97
TTFR rankings: 1272
Ratio Superior: 3.16
№689
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 152.47
TTFR rankings: 481
Ratio Superior: 3.15
№690
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.92
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 3.15
№691
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 13.03
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3.15
№692
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.76
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 3.15
№693
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 195.59
TTFR rankings: 615
Ratio Superior: 3.14
№694
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.8
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 3.14
№695
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.96
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 3.13
№696
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.19
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 3.13
№697
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.79
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3.13
№698
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.76
TTFR rankings: 571
Ratio Superior: 3.12
№699
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.93
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.12
№700
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.01
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 3.12
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
