The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
501
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.52
TTFR rankings: 449
Ratio Superior: 4.38
502
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.69
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 4.36
503
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 116.65
TTFR rankings: 508
Ratio Superior: 4.35
504
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.01
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 4.35
505
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.32
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 4.34
506
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.66
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 4.34
507
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.08
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 4.33
508
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 140.51
TTFR rankings: 608
Ratio Superior: 4.33
509
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 4.31
510
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.54
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 4.31
511
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.19
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 4.29
512
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.25
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 4.28
513
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 4.28
514
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.69
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 4.28
515
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 370.95
TTFR rankings: 1579
Ratio Superior: 4.26
516
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 198.31
TTFR rankings: 843
Ratio Superior: 4.25
517
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 4.25
518
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.62
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 4.23
519
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 49.79
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 4.22
520
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 163.47
TTFR rankings: 688
Ratio Superior: 4.21
521
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 4.2
522
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.27
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 4.19
523
Age: 7.9
Average rating: 3.34
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 4.19
524
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.28
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 4.18
525
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.32
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 4.18
526
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 4.18
527
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 137.21
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 4.18
528
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 81.48
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 4.17
529
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 64.04
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 4.17
530
Age: 14
Average rating: 66.56
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 4.16
531
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 4.14
532
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.52
TTFR rankings: 424
Ratio Superior: 4.14
533
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.57
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 4.13
534
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 4.12
535
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 358.6
TTFR rankings: 1477
Ratio Superior: 4.12
536
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.02
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 4.11
537
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 4.11
538
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.63
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 4.11
539
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.52
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 4.11
540
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.32
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 4.11
541
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.41
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 4.1
542
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.69
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 4.1
543
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.27
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 4.09
544
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.63
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 4.09
545
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.54
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 4.07
546
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.63
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 4.07
547
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 149.73
TTFR rankings: 607
Ratio Superior: 4.05
548
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 147.25
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 4.05
549
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.86
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 4.03
550
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 64.04
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 4.03
551
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 81.48
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 3.99
552
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 167.89
TTFR rankings: 669
Ratio Superior: 3.98
553
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.34
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 3.98
554
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 140.51
TTFR rankings: 559
Ratio Superior: 3.98
555
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.6
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.97
556
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.69
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 3.97
557
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 147.25
TTFR rankings: 584
Ratio Superior: 3.97
558
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 292.99
TTFR rankings: 1160
Ratio Superior: 3.96
559
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 266.45
TTFR rankings: 1053
Ratio Superior: 3.95
560
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.69
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 3.95
561
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.63
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.94
562
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.69
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 3.92
563
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.92
564
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 155.1
TTFR rankings: 607
Ratio Superior: 3.91
565
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.25
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 3.91
566
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 57.62
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 3.9
567
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.53
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 3.9
568
Age: 14
Average rating: 66.56
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 3.89
569
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.83
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 3.89
570
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 131.48
TTFR rankings: 511
Ratio Superior: 3.89
571
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 7.73
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 3.88
572
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.09
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 3.87
573
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 96.38
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 3.85
574
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.85
575
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.27
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.85
576
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 73.16
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 3.84
577
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.97
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 3.84
578
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.69
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 3.83
579
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.57
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.83
580
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 78.55
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 3.83
581
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.19
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.83
582
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.19
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.83
583
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 227.18
TTFR rankings: 868
Ratio Superior: 3.82
584
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 81.48
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 3.82
585
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.34
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 3.82
586
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 49.79
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 3.82
587
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 73.16
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 3.81
588
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.4
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 3.81
589
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 96.38
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 3.8
590
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.97
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 3.8
591
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.97
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 3.8
592
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.19
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 3.76
593
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.63
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 3.76
594
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.63
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 3.76
595
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.41
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 3.76
596
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.57
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.76
597
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.97
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 3.75
598
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 360.27
TTFR rankings: 1352
Ratio Superior: 3.75
599
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.69
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 3.75
600
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.66
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 3.75

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников