The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.26
TTFR rankings: 1247
Ratio Superior: 25.31
№2
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.7
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 23.09
№3
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.05
TTFR rankings: 666
Ratio Superior: 22.93
№4
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.11
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 20.38
№5
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 57.04
TTFR rankings: 1094
Ratio Superior: 19.18
№6
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.24
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 18.99
№7
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 47.01
TTFR rankings: 863
Ratio Superior: 18.36
№8
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.72
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 16.88
№9
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.45
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 15.81
№10
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.49
TTFR rankings: 621
Ratio Superior: 15.73
№11
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 20.32
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 15.45
№12
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.72
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 15.2
№13
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 101.97
TTFR rankings: 1549
Ratio Superior: 15.19
№14
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.32
TTFR rankings: 938
Ratio Superior: 14.81
№15
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.79
TTFR rankings: 1251
Ratio Superior: 14.75
№16
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 111.69
TTFR rankings: 1623
Ratio Superior: 14.53
№17
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 57.04
TTFR rankings: 827
Ratio Superior: 14.5
№18
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.06
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 13.89
№19
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.45
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 13.85
№20
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 122.75
TTFR rankings: 1691
Ratio Superior: 13.78
№21
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.02
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 13.16
№22
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.02
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 12.81
№23
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.21
TTFR rankings: 1020
Ratio Superior: 12.41
№24
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.54
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№25
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 72.53
TTFR rankings: 889
Ratio Superior: 12.26
№26
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.41
TTFR rankings: 392
Ratio Superior: 12.1
№27
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.49
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 11.67
№28
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 68.98
TTFR rankings: 804
Ratio Superior: 11.66
№29
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.53
TTFR rankings: 1136
Ratio Superior: 11.65
№30
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.24
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№31
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№32
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.29
TTFR rankings: 993
Ratio Superior: 11.38
№33
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.51
TTFR rankings: 1070
Ratio Superior: 11.32
№34
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.44
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 11.25
№35
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.53
TTFR rankings: 510
Ratio Superior: 11.2
№36
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.54
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 11.08
№37
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.06
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 11.01
№38
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№39
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.57
TTFR rankings: 432
Ratio Superior: 10.65
№40
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.76
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№41
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.58
TTFR rankings: 522
Ratio Superior: 10.12
№42
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.33
TTFR rankings: 768
Ratio Superior: 10.06
№43
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 168.18
TTFR rankings: 1691
Ratio Superior: 10.05
№44
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.76
TTFR rankings: 536
Ratio Superior: 9.97
№45
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.43
TTFR rankings: 572
Ratio Superior: 9.62
№46
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.57
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 9.56
№47
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 9.42
№48
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82.21
TTFR rankings: 774
Ratio Superior: 9.41
№49
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.59
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 9.38
№50
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 20.27
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 9.37
№51
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.33
TTFR rankings: 733
Ratio Superior: 9.36
№52
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.26
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 9.3
№53
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.49
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 9.09
№54
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.54
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 9.08
№55
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.43
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 9.04
№56
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.43
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 8.97
№57
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.51
TTFR rankings: 844
Ratio Superior: 8.93
№58
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.58
TTFR rankings: 459
Ratio Superior: 8.9
№59
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.59
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 8.87
№60
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.11
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 8.86
№61
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.11
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 8.86
№62
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.26
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 8.81
№63
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 89.44
TTFR rankings: 787
Ratio Superior: 8.8
№64
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.35
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 8.8
№65
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 138.83
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 8.73
№66
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.44
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 8.72
№67
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 61.83
TTFR rankings: 536
Ratio Superior: 8.67
№68
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.03
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 8.64
№69
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 68.98
TTFR rankings: 583
Ratio Superior: 8.45
№70
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.29
TTFR rankings: 733
Ratio Superior: 8.4
№71
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.8
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 8.35
№72
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 8.3
№73
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.11
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 8.29
№74
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 181.68
TTFR rankings: 1496
Ratio Superior: 8.23
№75
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.03
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 8.19
№76
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.05
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 8.12
№77
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 159.98
TTFR rankings: 1291
Ratio Superior: 8.07
№78
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.26
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 8.04
№79
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 146.85
TTFR rankings: 1180
Ratio Superior: 8.04
№80
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 20.93
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 7.98
№81
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.15
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 7.97
№82
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.3
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 7.96
№83
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.54
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 7.95
№84
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.6
TTFR rankings: 527
Ratio Superior: 7.91
№85
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.76
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 7.91
№86
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 7.8
№87
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.35
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 7.75
№88
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.03
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 7.73
№89
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.76
TTFR rankings: 292
Ratio Superior: 7.73
№90
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 187.53
TTFR rankings: 1439
Ratio Superior: 7.67
№91
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.6
TTFR rankings: 507
Ratio Superior: 7.61
№92
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.54
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 7.61
№93
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.24
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 7.59
№94
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.31
TTFR rankings: 747
Ratio Superior: 7.52
№95
Age: 15
Average rating: 104.06
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 7.51
№96
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 64.93
TTFR rankings: 483
Ratio Superior: 7.44
№97
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.14
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 7.42
№98
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.59
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 7.39
№99
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 74.81
TTFR rankings: 552
Ratio Superior: 7.38
№100
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 61.83
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 7.36
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
