The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
701
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.18
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3.22
702
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.68
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.22
703
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.77
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3.21
704
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.6
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 3.2
705
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.17
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.19
706
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 362.43
TTFR rankings: 1156
Ratio Superior: 3.19
707
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.26
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 3.18
708
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 183.72
TTFR rankings: 584
Ratio Superior: 3.18
709
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.51
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.17
710
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.63
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 3.16
711
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.73
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.15
712
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 403.88
TTFR rankings: 1272
Ratio Superior: 3.15
713
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.02
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 3.14
714
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.14
715
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.14
716
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.14
717
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 85.87
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 3.13
718
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.17
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.13
719
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.7
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 3.13
720
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.02
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 3.13
721
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.86
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.13
722
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.86
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.13
723
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 211.65
TTFR rankings: 660
Ratio Superior: 3.12
724
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.68
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.12
725
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.19
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.12
726
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.19
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.12
727
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 118
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 3.11
728
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.92
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 3.11
729
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 113.12
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 3.1
730
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 4.52
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 3.1
731
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.48
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 3.1
732
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 3.09
733
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.3
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.09
734
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.31
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 3.09
735
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.33
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 3.08
736
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.76
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 3.08
737
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.31
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.07
738
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.31
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.07
739
Age: 15
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 3.07
740
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.48
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 3.07
741
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.06
742
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 168.8
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 3.06
743
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.77
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 3.05
744
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 3.05
745
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.53
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 3.04
746
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 4.94
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 3.04
747
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.46
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.03
748
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.47
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.03
749
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 201.38
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 3.03
750
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.91
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 3.02
751
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.26
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 3.02
752
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.17
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 3.01
753
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.01
754
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 3.01
755
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.68
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3
756
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.69
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3
757
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.73
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3
758
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 121.61
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 2.99
759
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.42
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.99
760
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.02
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 2.99
761
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.48
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 2.98
762
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.63
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.98
763
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.47
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.97
764
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.43
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.96
765
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.53
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.96
766
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.84
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.96
767
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.36
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.96
768
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.26
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.95
769
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.93
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 2.94
770
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 125.1
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 2.94
771
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.94
772
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.93
773
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.93
774
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.84
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.93
775
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.9
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.93
776
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.93
777
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.18
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.92
778
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.42
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 2.92
779
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.51
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.92
780
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.17
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.92
781
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.42
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 2.91
782
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 183.72
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 2.91
783
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 137.04
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.91
784
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 381.98
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 2.91
785
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.43
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.9
786
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.86
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.89
787
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.3
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 2.89
788
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.46
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.88
789
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.08
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.88
790
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.84
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.87
791
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.87
792
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.69
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 2.87
793
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 149.18
TTFR rankings: 428
Ratio Superior: 2.87
794
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.42
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 2.87
795
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 90.64
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.87
796
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.28
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 2.87
797
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.82
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 2.87
798
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.7
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.86
799
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.17
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.86
800
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.31
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.86

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников