The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№801
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 57.05
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.05
№802
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 211.72
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 2.05
№803
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 269.09
TTFR rankings: 551
Ratio Superior: 2.05
№804
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 347.22
TTFR rankings: 710
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№805
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 134.98
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№806
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 169.56
TTFR rankings: 346
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№807
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.22
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№808
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.06
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№809
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.06
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.04
№810
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.32
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№811
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.22
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№812
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.58
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№813
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.92
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.03
№814
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 20.27
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.02
№815
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.07
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№816
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.12
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№817
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 70.05
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№818
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.84
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№819
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.17
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№820
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.34
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.01
№821
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.06
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№822
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.64
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№823
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.91
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№824
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 20.11
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№825
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.29
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.99
№826
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 183.6
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№827
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№828
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№829
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.92
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№830
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.74
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№831
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.64
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№832
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.64
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№833
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.18
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№834
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.07
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№835
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.22
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№836
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.18
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№837
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 46.88
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№838
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.25
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№839
Age: 16
Average rating: 141.59
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№840
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.08
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№841
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.94
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№842
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 98.77
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№843
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.13
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№844
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.53
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№845
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№846
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.22
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№847
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 124.51
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№848
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 111.77
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№849
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 39.25
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№850
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.84
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№851
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 132.36
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№852
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.13
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№853
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.22
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№854
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.22
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№855
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.6
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№856
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 46.88
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№857
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.91
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№858
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№859
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.4
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№860
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 203.6
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№861
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 214.22
TTFR rankings: 409
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№862
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.53
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№863
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.03
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№864
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.03
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№865
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 101.87
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№866
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.29
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№867
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 111.77
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№868
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.31
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№869
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.24
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№870
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 86.66
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№871
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.86
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№872
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.22
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№873
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.41
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№874
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.13
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№875
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 19.83
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№876
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 111.77
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№877
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№878
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.5
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№879
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.58
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№880
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№881
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 81.91
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№882
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.08
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№883
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№884
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 162.82
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№885
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.13
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№886
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.18
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№887
Age: 18
Average rating: 229.5
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№888
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 151.81
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№889
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 134.98
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№890
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.24
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№891
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.08
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№892
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.91
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№893
Age: 10
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№894
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.1
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№895
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.18
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№896
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.53
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№897
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 183.6
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№898
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.84
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№899
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 162.82
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№900
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.22
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.81
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
