The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 309.62
TTFR rankings: 785
Ratio Superior: 2.54
902
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 156.61
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 2.53
903
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 140.14
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 2.53
904
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.93
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.52
905
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.58
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.52
906
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.09
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.52
907
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.09
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.52
908
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 125.1
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 2.52
909
Age: 8
Average rating: 4.37
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 2.52
910
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.17
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.52
911
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 97.1
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.51
912
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.02
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 2.51
913
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 125.1
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 2.51
914
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.51
915
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 190.19
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.51
916
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.77
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.51
917
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.33
TTFR rankings: 419
Ratio Superior: 2.5
918
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.7
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.49
919
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.49
920
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.86
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.49
921
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.29
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.49
922
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.08
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.48
923
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.08
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.48
924
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.92
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.48
925
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.53
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.47
926
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.83
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.46
927
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.73
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.46
928
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.68
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.46
929
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.7
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.46
930
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.26
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.45
931
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.26
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.45
932
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.28
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.45
933
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.36
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 2.44
934
Age: 20
Average rating: 389.52
TTFR rankings: 945
Ratio Superior: 2.43
935
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.93
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.42
936
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.73
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.41
937
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.29
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 2.41
938
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.68
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.41
939
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.46
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.41
940
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.29
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.41
941
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 66.84
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 2.41
942
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.63
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.41
943
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.63
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.41
944
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.82
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.4
945
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.75
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 2.39
946
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 118.48
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 2.39
947
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.39
948
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 156.61
TTFR rankings: 373
Ratio Superior: 2.38
949
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.63
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.38
950
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.38
951
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.38
952
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.22
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.37
953
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 90.64
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 2.37
954
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.29
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.37
955
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.17
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.37
956
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.83
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.37
957
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.17
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.37
958
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 140.14
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 2.36
959
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 186.59
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 2.36
960
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.69
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 2.35
961
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 90.64
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 2.35
962
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.33
TTFR rankings: 393
Ratio Superior: 2.35
963
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.73
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.35
964
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.86
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.35
965
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.75
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 2.34
966
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.34
967
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.34
968
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.34
969
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.71
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.33
970
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 162.32
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 2.33
971
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 205.3
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 2.33
972
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.05
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.33
973
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.82
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.32
974
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.9
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 2.32
975
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.75
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.32
976
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.29
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2.31
977
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.17
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.31
978
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.31
979
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 2.31
980
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.22
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.3
981
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 309.62
TTFR rankings: 713
Ratio Superior: 2.3
982
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.3
983
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.22
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.29
984
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 114.63
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 2.29
985
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.29
986
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.26
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 2.29
987
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 5.67
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 2.29
988
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.47
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.29
989
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.84
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.29
990
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 97.1
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.29
991
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.36
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.28
992
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.46
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.28
993
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.46
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.28
994
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.28
995
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 113.12
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 2.28
996
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 201.38
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 2.27
997
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 201.38
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 2.27
998
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.77
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.27
999
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 114.63
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1000
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.02
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.26

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников