The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1001
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.78
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1002
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 124.54
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1003
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1004
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.35
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1005
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.46
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1006
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 184.17
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1007
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.94
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1008
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.98
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1009
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.55
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1010
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.44
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1011
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.9
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1012
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1013
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 47.28
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1014
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.8
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1015
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 246.62
TTFR rankings: 385
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1016
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.91
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1017
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.21
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1018
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.21
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1019
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 264.95
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.55
№1020
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.55
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1021
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 280.38
TTFR rankings: 432
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1022
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.89
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1023
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.5
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1024
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.82
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1025
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 269.25
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1026
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 212
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1027
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1028
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 366.72
TTFR rankings: 562
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1029
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.15
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1030
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 234.07
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1031
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.8
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.53
№1032
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.52
№1033
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.92
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.52
№1034
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.52
№1035
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.98
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.52
№1036
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.69
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.52
№1037
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.92
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 1.52
№1038
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 97.78
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1039
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1040
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.73
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1041
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.1
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1042
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1043
Age: 15
Average rating: 103.98
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1044
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1045
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 148.63
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1046
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 20.59
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1047
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.45
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.51
№1048
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.57
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.5
№1049
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.5
№1050
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 124.07
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.5
№1051
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 198.8
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 1.5
№1052
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.42
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.5
№1053
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 65.11
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1054
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1055
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.45
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1056
Age: 7.6
Average rating: 21.5
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1057
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.61
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1058
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 184.17
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1059
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 148.63
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1060
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 124.54
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.49
№1061
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.34
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1062
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.8
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1063
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1064
Age: 20
Average rating: 392.4
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1065
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 132.69
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1066
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 157.15
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1067
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 70.47
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.48
№1068
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 69.18
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.47
№1069
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.57
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.47
№1070
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.71
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.47
№1071
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.57
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.47
№1072
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.47
№1073
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.86
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.47
№1074
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1075
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 199.29
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1076
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1077
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.4
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1078
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 91.9
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1079
Age: 18
Average rating: 230.1
TTFR rankings: 335
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1080
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.46
№1081
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 108.7
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1082
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.73
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1083
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 33.73
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1084
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1085
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 193.38
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1086
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.8
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1087
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 70.47
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1088
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.76
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.45
№1089
Age: 16
Average rating: 138.42
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1090
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.46
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1091
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 252.14
TTFR rankings: 363
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1092
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 132.69
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1093
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.45
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1094
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 82
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1095
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.61
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1096
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.55
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1097
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 345.96
TTFR rankings: 497
Ratio Superior: 1.44
№1098
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 171.57
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 1.43
№1099
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.42
№1100
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.3
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.42
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников