The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 168.04
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 1.33
902
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.28
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.33
903
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 123.94
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.33
904
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 111.46
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.33
905
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 82.36
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.32
906
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 96.05
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 1.32
907
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 68.15
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.32
908
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 89.44
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.32
909
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 19.74
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.32
910
Age: 18
Average rating: 247.53
TTFR rankings: 326
Ratio Superior: 1.32
911
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 176.18
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 1.32
912
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 168.04
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.32
913
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 103.6
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 1.31
914
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 42.85
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.31
915
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 74.28
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.31
916
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 58.21
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.31
917
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 87.62
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.3
918
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 135.46
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 1.3
919
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 190.34
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 1.29
920
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 20.9
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.29
921
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.1
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.29
922
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 96.05
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.29
923
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 30.28
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.29
924
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 340.2
TTFR rankings: 437
Ratio Superior: 1.28
925
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 23.38
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.28
926
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 25.83
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.28
927
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 18.84
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.27
928
Age: 15
Average rating: 127.98
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.27
929
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 154.1
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 1.27
930
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 349.13
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 1.27
931
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 22.81
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.27
932
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 259.15
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 1.27
933
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 146.88
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.27
934
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.43
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.27
935
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 82.36
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.26
936
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 158.73
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 1.26
937
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 146.89
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.26
938
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 209.74
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 1.26
939
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 123.94
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 1.26
940
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 43.74
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.26
941
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 204.6
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 1.26
942
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 19.94
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.25
943
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.25
944
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.25
945
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 226.66
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 1.24
946
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 168.04
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 1.24
947
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 20.93
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.24
948
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 89.44
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 1.24
949
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 190.34
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 1.24
950
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 154.1
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 1.24
951
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 48.41
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.24
952
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 96.05
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.24
953
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.06
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.24
954
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 74.28
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.24
955
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 42.85
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.24
956
Age: 16
Average rating: 163.33
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 1.24
957
Age: 14
Average rating: 91.71
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 1.23
958
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 34.94
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.23
959
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.21
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.23
960
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.21
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.23
961
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 263.87
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 1.23
962
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 158.73
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1.22
963
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 67.32
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.22
964
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 54.19
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.22
965
Age: 18
Average rating: 247.53
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 1.22
966
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 55.97
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.21
967
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.1
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.21
968
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.1
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.21
969
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 60.25
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.21
970
Age: 11
Average rating: 23.94
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.21
971
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 115.02
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.21
972
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 37.26
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.21
973
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 23.38
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.2
974
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 23.38
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.2
975
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 157.7
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 1.19
976
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.21
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.19
977
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 231.23
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 1.19
978
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 43.74
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.19
979
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 151.41
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.19
980
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 177.91
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.19
981
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.18
982
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 135.46
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 1.18
983
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 154.1
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.18
984
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 117.82
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.18
985
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 185.59
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 1.17
986
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.17
987
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 89.44
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 1.17
988
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 99.77
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.17
989
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 168.04
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 1.17
990
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 212.49
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 1.17
991
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 158.73
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.17
992
Age: 10
Average rating: 20.53
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.17
993
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.1
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.17
994
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 19.71
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.17
995
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.8
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.16
996
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 99.77
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 1.16
997
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 390.71
TTFR rankings: 454
Ratio Superior: 1.16
998
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.43
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.16
999
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1000
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 48.41
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.16

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников