The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.14
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 2.57
902
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.77
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 2.57
903
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.61
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.56
904
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.66
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.56
905
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.74
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.56
906
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.3
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 2.56
907
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.82
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.56
908
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.4
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.56
909
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.56
910
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 220.53
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 2.55
911
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.01
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.55
912
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.55
913
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.55
914
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.55
915
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 195.43
TTFR rankings: 498
Ratio Superior: 2.55
916
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.54
917
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.54
918
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.42
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.54
919
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.42
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.54
920
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.48
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 2.54
921
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.66
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.53
922
Age: 10
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.53
923
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.61
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.53
924
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.07
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.52
925
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.52
926
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.52
927
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 158.55
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.52
928
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.52
929
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 186.53
TTFR rankings: 469
Ratio Superior: 2.51
930
Age: 16
Average rating: 111.37
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 2.51
931
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.38
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.51
932
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.9
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.51
933
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.51
934
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.5
935
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.79
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.5
936
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 158.55
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 2.5
937
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.49
938
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.49
939
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.04
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.49
940
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.04
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.49
941
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.49
942
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 90.61
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.48
943
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.48
944
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.25
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 2.48
945
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.74
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.48
946
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.54
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.48
947
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.48
948
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.38
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.47
949
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.6
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.47
950
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 193.47
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.47
951
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.12
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 2.46
952
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.46
953
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.46
954
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.82
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.45
955
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.45
956
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.79
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.45
957
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.45
958
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.44
959
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.26
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 2.44
960
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.98
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.44
961
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 135.47
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 2.44
962
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.44
963
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.53
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.43
964
Age: 18
Average rating: 206.33
TTFR rankings: 502
Ratio Superior: 2.43
965
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.14
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 2.43
966
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 298.65
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 2.43
967
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.43
968
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.43
969
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 152.78
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 2.42
970
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.49
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.42
971
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.42
972
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.5
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.42
973
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.42
974
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.04
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 2.41
975
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.41
976
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.41
977
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.47
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.41
978
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.02
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.41
979
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.02
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.41
980
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.41
981
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.41
982
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.39
983
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.89
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.39
984
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.79
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.39
985
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.49
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.39
986
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.39
987
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.38
988
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.38
989
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.84
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.38
990
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.26
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 2.38
991
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.37
992
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.37
993
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 178.12
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 2.37
994
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.06
TTFR rankings: 346
Ratio Superior: 2.37
995
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.01
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.37
996
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.1
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 2.37
997
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 2.37
998
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.36
999
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.88
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1000
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.53
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.36

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников