The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№901
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.14
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№902
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.77
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№903
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.61
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№904
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.66
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№905
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.74
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№906
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.3
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№907
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.82
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№908
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.4
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№909
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№910
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 220.53
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№911
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.01
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№912
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№913
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№914
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№915
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 195.43
TTFR rankings: 498
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№916
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№917
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№918
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.42
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№919
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.42
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№920
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.48
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№921
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.66
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№922
Age: 10
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№923
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.61
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№924
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.07
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№925
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№926
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№927
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 158.55
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№928
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№929
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 186.53
TTFR rankings: 469
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№930
Age: 16
Average rating: 111.37
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№931
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.38
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№932
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.9
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№933
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№934
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№935
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.79
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№936
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 158.55
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№937
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№938
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№939
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.04
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№940
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.04
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№941
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.78
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№942
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 90.61
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№943
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№944
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.25
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№945
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.74
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№946
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.54
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№947
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№948
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.38
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№949
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.6
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№950
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 193.47
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№951
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.12
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№952
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№953
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№954
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.82
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№955
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№956
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.79
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№957
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№958
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.44
№959
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.26
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 2.44
№960
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.98
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.44
№961
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 135.47
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 2.44
№962
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.44
№963
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.53
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№964
Age: 18
Average rating: 206.33
TTFR rankings: 502
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№965
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.14
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№966
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 298.65
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№967
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№968
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№969
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 152.78
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№970
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.49
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№971
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№972
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.5
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№973
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№974
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.04
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№975
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№976
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№977
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.47
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№978
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.02
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№979
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.02
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№980
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№981
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.31
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№982
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.71
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№983
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.89
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№984
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.79
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№985
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.49
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№986
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№987
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№988
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№989
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.84
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№990
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.26
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№991
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№992
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№993
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 178.12
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№994
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.06
TTFR rankings: 346
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№995
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.01
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№996
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.1
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№997
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№998
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№999
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.88
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№1000
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.53
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.36
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников