The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.97
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 22.17
№2
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.81
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 21.43
№3
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.75
TTFR rankings: 680
Ratio Superior: 21.42
№4
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 18.54
№5
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.67
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 18.43
№6
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.85
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 18.07
№7
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.89
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 17.75
№8
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.94
TTFR rankings: 778
Ratio Superior: 16.94
№9
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.81
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 16.72
№10
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 16.35
№11
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.85
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 16.19
№12
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 27.01
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 16.07
№13
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 15.87
№14
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.04
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 15.77
№15
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.97
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 15.53
№16
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 15.37
№17
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.07
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 15.34
№18
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.35
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 15.27
№19
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.75
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 14.52
№20
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.85
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 14.24
№21
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.71
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 14.23
№22
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.79
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 14
№23
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.85
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 13.91
№24
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.61
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 13.84
№25
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.05
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 13.6
№26
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 84.14
TTFR rankings: 1133
Ratio Superior: 13.47
№27
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.85
TTFR rankings: 761
Ratio Superior: 13.39
№28
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.67
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 13.18
№29
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 69.56
TTFR rankings: 908
Ratio Superior: 13.05
№30
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.85
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 13.04
№31
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.07
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 13.01
№32
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.44
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 12.94
№33
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.23
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 12.51
№34
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 12.49
№35
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.85
TTFR rankings: 695
Ratio Superior: 12.23
№36
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 143.53
TTFR rankings: 1746
Ratio Superior: 12.16
№37
Age: 14
Average rating: 62.79
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 12.07
№38
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 64.68
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 11.94
№39
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.23
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 11.85
№40
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.12
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 11.54
№41
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.81
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 11.53
№42
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.53
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 11.51
№43
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.05
TTFR rankings: 426
Ratio Superior: 11.5
№44
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.97
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 11.37
№45
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.44
TTFR rankings: 495
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№46
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.23
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№47
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.46
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 11.06
№48
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 27.01
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 11.03
№49
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.04
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№50
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 10.79
№51
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 150.72
TTFR rankings: 1618
Ratio Superior: 10.74
№52
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.23
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 10.7
№53
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.47
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 10.69
№54
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 79.36
TTFR rankings: 846
Ratio Superior: 10.66
№55
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 10.66
№56
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.75
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 10.61
№57
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.97
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 10.57
№58
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 10.5
№59
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 80.63
TTFR rankings: 837
Ratio Superior: 10.38
№60
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.05
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 10.28
№61
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 138.15
TTFR rankings: 1403
Ratio Superior: 10.16
№62
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.07
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 10.15
№63
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.1
TTFR rankings: 691
Ratio Superior: 10.15
№64
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 73.69
TTFR rankings: 745
Ratio Superior: 10.11
№65
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.05
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№66
Age: 16
Average rating: 121.15
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 10
№67
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.78
TTFR rankings: 981
Ratio Superior: 9.93
№68
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.54
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 9.9
№69
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.78
TTFR rankings: 972
Ratio Superior: 9.84
№70
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 76.99
TTFR rankings: 751
Ratio Superior: 9.75
№71
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.81
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 9.7
№72
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.26
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 9.66
№73
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 9.62
№74
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.91
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 9.46
№75
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.53
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 9.43
№76
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.45
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 9.37
№77
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.46
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 9.35
№78
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.81
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 9.33
№79
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.72
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 9.31
№80
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.27
TTFR rankings: 439
Ratio Superior: 9.29
№81
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.05
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 9.25
№82
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.36
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№83
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.94
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 9.19
№84
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.78
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.09
№85
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.78
TTFR rankings: 889
Ratio Superior: 9
№86
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 88.07
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 8.98
№87
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 27.01
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 8.96
№88
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.27
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 8.95
№89
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 113.55
TTFR rankings: 1011
Ratio Superior: 8.9
№90
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 50.04
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 8.89
№91
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.97
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 8.85
№92
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.72
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 8.75
№93
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.62
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 8.68
№94
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.91
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№95
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 84.14
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 8.63
№96
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.75
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 8.6
№97
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.54
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 8.6
№98
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 61.25
TTFR rankings: 523
Ratio Superior: 8.54
№99
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.81
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 8.51
№100
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.66
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 8.49
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
