The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
801
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.12
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.85
802
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.85
803
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.11
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 2.85
804
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.85
805
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.17
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.84
806
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.11
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 2.84
807
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.34
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 2.84
808
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.53
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.83
809
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.07
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.83
810
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.83
811
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.55
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.83
812
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 129.16
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 2.83
813
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.65
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.82
814
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.91
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.82
815
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.89
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 2.82
816
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.5
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 2.81
817
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.9
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.81
818
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 199.2
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 2.8
819
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.64
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.8
820
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.07
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.8
821
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.37
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.8
822
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.89
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.8
823
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.12
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 2.8
824
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.8
825
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.79
826
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.42
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.79
827
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.42
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.79
828
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.08
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2.79
829
Age: 18
Average rating: 202.75
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 2.78
830
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.39
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 2.78
831
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 11.17
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.78
832
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.39
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.77
833
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 2.77
834
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.11
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.77
835
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.77
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.76
836
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.53
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 2.76
837
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.5
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 2.75
838
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.16
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 2.74
839
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.74
840
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.34
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 2.73
841
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.42
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.73
842
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 265.46
TTFR rankings: 724
Ratio Superior: 2.73
843
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 186.65
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 2.73
844
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.72
845
Age: 9
Average rating: 12.5
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.72
846
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.37
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.72
847
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.82
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 2.72
848
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.74
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.71
849
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.71
850
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 155
TTFR rankings: 420
Ratio Superior: 2.71
851
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.04
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 2.7
852
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.65
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.7
853
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.81
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 2.7
854
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 199.2
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 2.7
855
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.49
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.69
856
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.11
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.69
857
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.42
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.68
858
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.37
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 2.68
859
Age: 16
Average rating: 110.64
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 2.68
860
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.89
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.67
861
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.91
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.67
862
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.91
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.66
863
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.42
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.66
864
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 307.26
TTFR rankings: 817
Ratio Superior: 2.66
865
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.12
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 2.66
866
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.64
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.66
867
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.65
868
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.9
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 2.65
869
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.48
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 2.65
870
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.94
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.65
871
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.02
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 2.64
872
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.92
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 2.64
873
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 355.34
TTFR rankings: 936
Ratio Superior: 2.63
874
Age: 17
Average rating: 146.56
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 2.63
875
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.55
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.63
876
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.49
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 2.62
877
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.11
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.62
878
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.33
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.62
879
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.05
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.62
880
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.61
881
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.93
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.61
882
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 33.75
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.61
883
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.16
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 2.6
884
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.68
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.6
885
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.29
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.6
886
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 191.83
TTFR rankings: 498
Ratio Superior: 2.6
887
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.49
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.59
888
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.49
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.59
889
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.42
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.59
890
Age: 16
Average rating: 110.64
TTFR rankings: 287
Ratio Superior: 2.59
891
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 129.16
TTFR rankings: 335
Ratio Superior: 2.59
892
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.11
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 2.59
893
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 214.23
TTFR rankings: 555
Ratio Superior: 2.59
894
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.04
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.59
895
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 248.77
TTFR rankings: 644
Ratio Superior: 2.59
896
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 186.65
TTFR rankings: 483
Ratio Superior: 2.59
897
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.11
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.59
898
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.33
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.59
899
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.33
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.59
900
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.94
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 2.58

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников