The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1001
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 106.54
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1002
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.1
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1003
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.97
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1004
Age: 17
Average rating: 162.7
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1005
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.55
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1006
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 10.99
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1007
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 172.3
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1008
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 374.16
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1009
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 75.81
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1010
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1011
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.33
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1012
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.15
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1013
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.43
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1014
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 109.86
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1015
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 106.54
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1016
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 218.35
TTFR rankings: 452
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1017
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.13
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1018
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.07
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1019
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.92
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1020
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.98
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1021
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 63.98
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1022
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.39
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1023
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.15
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1024
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.52
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1025
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.61
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1026
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 74.04
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1027
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 269.37
TTFR rankings: 552
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1028
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.58
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1029
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.24
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1030
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 85.38
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1031
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.11
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1032
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.55
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1033
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 87
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1034
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 13.81
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1035
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.26
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1036
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.54
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1037
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 132.92
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1038
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 88.14
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1039
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.23
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1040
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.55
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1041
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.11
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1042
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.18
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1043
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.22
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1044
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.22
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1045
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.07
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1046
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 156.34
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1047
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.97
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1048
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 65.21
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1049
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.45
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1050
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.45
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1051
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 82.71
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1052
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.95
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1053
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 91.29
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 2
1054
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.54
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2
1055
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 129.27
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 2
1056
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1057
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 87
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1058
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.2
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1059
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.43
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1060
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 310.17
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1061
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.23
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1062
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.64
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1063
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1064
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.55
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1065
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 65.21
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1066
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1067
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 97.61
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1068
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 365.2
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1069
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.54
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1070
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.91
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1071
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 122.9
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1072
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 74.04
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1073
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.92
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1074
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.11
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1075
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 129.27
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1076
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.23
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1077
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1078
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 41.75
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1079
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 41.75
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1080
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 310.17
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1081
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 11.89
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1082
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.23
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1083
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 85.38
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1084
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 63.98
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1085
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.13
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1086
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 365.92
TTFR rankings: 703
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1087
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 116.1
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1088
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 103.13
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1089
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.26
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1090
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.54
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1091
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1092
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.32
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1093
Age: 19
Average rating: 305.38
TTFR rankings: 583
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1094
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.39
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1095
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 142.68
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1096
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 184.83
TTFR rankings: 352
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1097
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 165.04
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1098
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.2
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1099
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 69.08
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1100
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.15
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.89

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников