The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1001
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.88
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1002
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.75
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1003
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.25
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1004
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 132.65
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1005
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.12
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1006
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1007
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.44
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№1008
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 266.63
TTFR rankings: 621
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№1009
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 42.6
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1010
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.95
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1011
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.25
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1012
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 123.66
TTFR rankings: 287
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1013
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.39
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1014
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.15
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1015
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1016
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 123.66
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1017
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.42
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1018
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.56
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1019
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 178.59
TTFR rankings: 412
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1020
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.33
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1021
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 123.66
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1022
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.64
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1023
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 178.59
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1024
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 117.76
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1025
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.76
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1026
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.79
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1027
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.79
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1028
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 174.25
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1029
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.54
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1030
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 254.3
TTFR rankings: 582
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1031
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.03
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1032
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.21
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1033
Age: 17
Average rating: 149.85
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 2.28
№1034
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.28
№1035
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.3
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№1036
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.3
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№1037
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№1038
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.89
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№1039
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.49
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 2.27
№1040
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 12.86
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.26
№1041
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.15
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№1042
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.46
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№1043
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.17
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№1044
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.17
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№1045
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 100.06
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.25
№1046
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.33
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.24
№1047
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.54
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 2.23
№1048
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.33
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 2.23
№1049
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 356.42
TTFR rankings: 793
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1050
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.43
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1051
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 127.35
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1052
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 100.06
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1053
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 100.06
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1054
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.76
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1055
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 261.71
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 2.22
№1056
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.83
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.21
№1057
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 124.72
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 2.21
№1058
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.33
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.21
№1059
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.07
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1060
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.42
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1061
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.22
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1062
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.89
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1063
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 13.2
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1064
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.52
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1065
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.75
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 2.2
№1066
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 14.13
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1067
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.74
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.19
№1068
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.12
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1069
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.12
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1070
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.5
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1071
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 12.86
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1072
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.88
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.18
№1073
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.43
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.17
№1074
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.17
№1075
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.17
№1076
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.5
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.17
№1077
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.17
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.17
№1078
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.64
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 2.16
№1079
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.92
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.16
№1080
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 261.71
TTFR rankings: 565
Ratio Superior: 2.16
№1081
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.16
№1082
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.12
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.15
№1083
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.3
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.15
№1084
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.81
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1085
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.13
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1086
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.83
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1087
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.06
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.14
№1088
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.7
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1089
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.51
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1090
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 209.4
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1091
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1092
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 12.69
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1093
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.04
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.13
№1094
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.83
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1095
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1096
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.33
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.12
№1097
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 362.77
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1098
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1099
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.98
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.11
№1100
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 25.1
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.11
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
