The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.05
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.57
902
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 193.69
TTFR rankings: 498
Ratio Superior: 2.57
903
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.81
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.57
904
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 188.12
TTFR rankings: 483
Ratio Superior: 2.57
905
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 81.8
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 2.57
906
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.57
907
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.57
908
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.3
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 2.57
909
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.56
910
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.53
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 2.56
911
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.75
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.56
912
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 155.88
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.56
913
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.51
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.56
914
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 87.96
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.56
915
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 220.1
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 2.56
916
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.09
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.56
917
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.05
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.55
918
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 84.24
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 2.55
919
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.3
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.55
920
Age: 16
Average rating: 109.99
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 2.55
921
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.1
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 2.55
922
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.86
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.55
923
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 134.5
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 2.54
924
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.89
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.54
925
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.45
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 2.54
926
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.53
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.54
927
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.41
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 2.54
928
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 188.12
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.54
929
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.72
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.54
930
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.33
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.53
931
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.9
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.52
932
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.81
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.51
933
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.41
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.51
934
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.72
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 2.51
935
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.51
936
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.51
937
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 2.51
938
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.89
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.51
939
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.35
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.51
940
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.15
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.51
941
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.51
942
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.9
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.5
943
Age: 18
Average rating: 201.1
TTFR rankings: 502
Ratio Superior: 2.5
944
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 188.12
TTFR rankings: 469
Ratio Superior: 2.49
945
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.53
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.49
946
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.45
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.49
947
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.87
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 2.49
948
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.41
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.49
949
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.6
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.48
950
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.95
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.48
951
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.48
952
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.48
953
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 81.8
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 2.47
954
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.58
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.47
955
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.21
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.47
956
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.56
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.46
957
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.56
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.46
958
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.81
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.46
959
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.45
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.46
960
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.21
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.45
961
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.21
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.45
962
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.61
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.45
963
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 129.81
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 2.45
964
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.89
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.44
965
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.92
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.44
966
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.44
967
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 162.33
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 2.44
968
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.9
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.44
969
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.9
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.44
970
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.44
971
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.44
972
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 298.21
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 2.43
973
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 87.96
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 2.43
974
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.09
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.43
975
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 65.59
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.42
976
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.83
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.42
977
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.67
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.42
978
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.9
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 2.42
979
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.97
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.42
980
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.97
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.42
981
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.41
982
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.3
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.41
983
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.72
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 2.41
984
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.53
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.4
985
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.81
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.4
986
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.87
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.4
987
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.87
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.4
988
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.04
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.4
989
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.06
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 2.39
990
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 129.81
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 2.39
991
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.95
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.39
992
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.51
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.39
993
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 138.39
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 2.38
994
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.09
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.38
995
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.87
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.38
996
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 71.95
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.38
997
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 80.96
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 2.37
998
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.35
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.37
999
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.24
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1000
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.73
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.36

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников