The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
101
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.29
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 9.09
102
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 97.11
TTFR rankings: 881
Ratio Superior: 9.07
103
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.41
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 8.97
104
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.77
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 8.94
105
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.4
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 8.94
106
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.32
TTFR rankings: 539
Ratio Superior: 8.94
107
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.78
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 8.92
108
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.05
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 8.87
109
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.96
TTFR rankings: 627
Ratio Superior: 8.84
110
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.41
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 8.83
111
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.5
TTFR rankings: 708
Ratio Superior: 8.8
112
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.83
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 8.79
113
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.24
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 8.77
114
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.67
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 8.71
115
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.96
TTFR rankings: 617
Ratio Superior: 8.7
116
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.45
TTFR rankings: 743
Ratio Superior: 8.59
117
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.74
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 8.59
118
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.58
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 8.57
119
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.13
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 8.54
120
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.29
TTFR rankings: 497
Ratio Superior: 8.53
121
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.53
TTFR rankings: 550
Ratio Superior: 8.52
122
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.68
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 8.51
123
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.6
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 8.49
124
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.05
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 8.49
125
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.35
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 8.44
126
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.14
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 8.41
127
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 73.38
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 8.39
128
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.86
TTFR rankings: 1096
Ratio Superior: 8.38
129
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 8.36
130
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.78
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 8.35
131
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.53
TTFR rankings: 538
Ratio Superior: 8.34
132
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.14
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 8.32
133
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.72
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 8.28
134
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 97.11
TTFR rankings: 801
Ratio Superior: 8.25
135
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.96
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 8.23
136
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 8.2
137
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.58
TTFR rankings: 503
Ratio Superior: 8.17
138
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.82
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 8.1
139
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.35
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 8.06
140
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 12.43
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 8.05
141
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.83
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 8.02
142
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.09
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 7.95
143
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 97.11
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 7.94
144
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 202.99
TTFR rankings: 1611
Ratio Superior: 7.94
145
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 118.55
TTFR rankings: 940
Ratio Superior: 7.93
146
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 7.91
147
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.72
TTFR rankings: 1126
Ratio Superior: 7.89
148
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.32
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 7.86
149
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.38
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 7.86
150
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.86
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 7.82
151
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.73
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 7.79
152
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 147.86
TTFR rankings: 1148
Ratio Superior: 7.76
153
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.7
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 7.76
154
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.13
TTFR rankings: 865
Ratio Superior: 7.71
155
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.96
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 7.71
156
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 243.43
TTFR rankings: 1867
Ratio Superior: 7.67
157
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.37
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 7.65
158
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.13
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 7.65
159
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 7.6
160
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.13
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 7.6
161
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.96
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 7.58
162
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.55
TTFR rankings: 820
Ratio Superior: 7.55
163
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.58
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 7.54
164
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.38
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 7.51
165
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 255.84
TTFR rankings: 1902
Ratio Superior: 7.43
166
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.53
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 7.42
167
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.55
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 7.42
168
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.77
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 7.4
169
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.67
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 7.39
170
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.05
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 7.38
171
Age: 18
Average rating: 206.68
TTFR rankings: 1523
Ratio Superior: 7.37
172
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.52
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 7.33
173
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.91
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 7.31
174
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.05
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 7.31
175
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.25
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 7.28
176
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.05
TTFR rankings: 415
Ratio Superior: 7.27
177
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.22
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 7.27
178
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.25
TTFR rankings: 503
Ratio Superior: 7.26
179
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.35
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 7.22
180
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 172.11
TTFR rankings: 1233
Ratio Superior: 7.16
181
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.32
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 7.13
182
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 12.85
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 7.08
183
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 120.53
TTFR rankings: 852
Ratio Superior: 7.07
184
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.21
TTFR rankings: 1081
Ratio Superior: 7.06
185
Age: 17
Average rating: 149.14
TTFR rankings: 1051
Ratio Superior: 7.05
186
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.93
TTFR rankings: 591
Ratio Superior: 7.04
187
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 118.55
TTFR rankings: 833
Ratio Superior: 7.03
188
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.14
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 7.02
189
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.05
TTFR rankings: 400
Ratio Superior: 7.01
190
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.55
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 7.01
191
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.54
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 7.01
192
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.77
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.99
193
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 157.82
TTFR rankings: 1097
Ratio Superior: 6.95
194
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.6
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 6.94
195
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.53
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 6.93
196
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 172.11
TTFR rankings: 1191
Ratio Superior: 6.92
197
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.5
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 6.91
198
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.7
TTFR rankings: 633
Ratio Superior: 6.9
199
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.96
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 6.88
200
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.96
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 6.88

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников