The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.52
TTFR rankings: 681
Ratio Superior: 21.61
№2
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.95
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 20.88
№3
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 20.68
№4
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 20.22
№5
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.98
TTFR rankings: 737
Ratio Superior: 19.4
№6
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 18.34
№7
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.82
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 17.84
№8
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 375
Ratio Superior: 17.23
№9
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 17.12
№10
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.34
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 17.1
№11
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.46
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 15.8
№12
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.82
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 15.53
№13
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.81
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 15.43
№14
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.02
TTFR rankings: 597
Ratio Superior: 15.3
№15
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.39
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 15.27
№16
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 14.98
№17
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.23
TTFR rankings: 1148
Ratio Superior: 14.86
№18
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.9
TTFR rankings: 987
Ratio Superior: 14.75
№19
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.95
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 14.51
№20
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.24
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 14.48
№21
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.1
TTFR rankings: 854
Ratio Superior: 14.21
№22
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.54
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 13.9
№23
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.34
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 13.87
№24
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.54
TTFR rankings: 750
Ratio Superior: 13.75
№25
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.16
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 13.6
№26
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 595
Ratio Superior: 13.57
№27
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.55
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 13.4
№28
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.91
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 13.27
№29
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.63
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 13.06
№30
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 135.73
TTFR rankings: 1758
Ratio Superior: 12.95
№31
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.91
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 12.67
№32
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.65
TTFR rankings: 463
Ratio Superior: 12.63
№33
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 12.53
№34
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.1
TTFR rankings: 749
Ratio Superior: 12.46
№35
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.55
TTFR rankings: 652
Ratio Superior: 12.41
№36
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.91
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№37
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 42.18
TTFR rankings: 517
Ratio Superior: 12.26
№38
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.3
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 12.21
№39
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.74
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 12.17
№40
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 11.91
№41
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.25
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 11.84
№42
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.59
TTFR rankings: 763
Ratio Superior: 11.81
№43
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.65
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 11.76
№44
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.23
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 11.63
№45
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.93
TTFR rankings: 659
Ratio Superior: 11.58
№46
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.32
TTFR rankings: 869
Ratio Superior: 11.54
№47
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.32
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 11.5
№48
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.23
TTFR rankings: 884
Ratio Superior: 11.45
№49
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.42
TTFR rankings: 789
Ratio Superior: 11.37
№50
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 116.19
TTFR rankings: 1318
Ratio Superior: 11.34
№51
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.39
TTFR rankings: 467
Ratio Superior: 11.28
№52
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 141.99
TTFR rankings: 1596
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№53
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.25
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 11.22
№54
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.58
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 11.18
№55
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.85
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 11.15
№56
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 11.03
№57
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.87
TTFR rankings: 1438
Ratio Superior: 10.99
№58
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.46
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 10.89
№59
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.65
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 10.88
№60
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.98
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 10.82
№61
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.52
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 10.69
№62
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.61
TTFR rankings: 666
Ratio Superior: 10.64
№63
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.6
TTFR rankings: 525
Ratio Superior: 10.58
№64
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.3
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 10.53
№65
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.35
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 10.49
№66
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.97
TTFR rankings: 765
Ratio Superior: 10.48
№67
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.25
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 10.44
№68
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.27
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 10.44
№69
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.3
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 10.42
№70
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.58
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 10.32
№71
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.34
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 10.29
№72
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.85
TTFR rankings: 972
Ratio Superior: 10.25
№73
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.42
TTFR rankings: 705
Ratio Superior: 10.16
№74
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.65
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 10.12
№75
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.34
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 10.09
№76
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.93
TTFR rankings: 566
Ratio Superior: 9.94
№77
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 9.82
№78
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.85
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.78
№79
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.46
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 9.69
№80
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 424
Ratio Superior: 9.67
№81
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.21
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 9.64
№82
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 11.17
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 9.58
№83
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.05
TTFR rankings: 991
Ratio Superior: 9.52
№84
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.9
TTFR rankings: 635
Ratio Superior: 9.49
№85
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.85
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.47
№86
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.16
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 9.44
№87
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.29
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 9.42
№88
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.65
TTFR rankings: 345
Ratio Superior: 9.41
№89
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 9.36
№90
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.42
TTFR rankings: 752
Ratio Superior: 9.35
№91
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.9
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 9.33
№92
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.38
TTFR rankings: 1009
Ratio Superior: 9.31
№93
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.55
TTFR rankings: 487
Ratio Superior: 9.27
№94
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№95
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.74
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 9.18
№96
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 84.17
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 9.16
№97
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.39
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 9.15
№98
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.24
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 9.14
№99
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.65
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 9.12
№100
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.31
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 9.09
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
