The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
201
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.9
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 6.76
202
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.41
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 6.7
203
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.92
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.68
204
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.27
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 6.68
205
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.85
TTFR rankings: 633
Ratio Superior: 6.67
206
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.57
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 6.65
207
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 141.99
TTFR rankings: 943
Ratio Superior: 6.64
208
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 283.34
TTFR rankings: 1876
Ratio Superior: 6.62
209
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.46
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 6.62
210
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.22
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 6.6
211
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.65
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 6.55
212
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.52
213
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.9
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 6.51
214
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.49
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 6.51
215
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.42
TTFR rankings: 523
Ratio Superior: 6.5
216
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.58
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 6.48
217
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.16
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.48
218
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.22
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 6.47
219
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 191.26
TTFR rankings: 1236
Ratio Superior: 6.46
220
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 6.46
221
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 171.89
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 6.46
222
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.64
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 6.44
223
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.46
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 6.39
224
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.39
225
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.23
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 6.38
226
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 6.34
227
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 180.6
TTFR rankings: 1145
Ratio Superior: 6.34
228
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.46
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 6.32
229
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.85
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 6.31
230
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.23
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 6.3
231
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 151.2
TTFR rankings: 952
Ratio Superior: 6.3
232
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 6.3
233
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.6
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 6.25
234
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.77
TTFR rankings: 700
Ratio Superior: 6.21
235
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 6.2
236
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 297.6
TTFR rankings: 1842
Ratio Superior: 6.19
237
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.6
TTFR rankings: 307
Ratio Superior: 6.19
238
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.99
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 6.19
239
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.25
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 6.18
240
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.46
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 6.15
241
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.55
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 6.15
242
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 218
TTFR rankings: 1334
Ratio Superior: 6.12
243
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.22
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 6.1
244
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.61
TTFR rankings: 374
Ratio Superior: 6.07
245
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.8
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 6.06
246
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.39
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 6.05
247
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.31
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 6.04
248
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.15
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 6.03
249
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.24
TTFR rankings: 465
Ratio Superior: 6.02
250
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.54
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 6.01
251
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 5.99
252
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.91
TTFR rankings: 400
Ratio Superior: 5.98
253
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.58
TTFR rankings: 487
Ratio Superior: 5.97
254
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.73
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 5.94
255
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.1
TTFR rankings: 356
Ratio Superior: 5.92
256
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.49
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 5.91
257
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.97
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 5.91
258
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.39
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.89
259
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.1
TTFR rankings: 353
Ratio Superior: 5.87
260
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.85
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 5.87
261
Age: 10
Average rating: 15.01
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 5.86
262
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 191.26
TTFR rankings: 1121
Ratio Superior: 5.86
263
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.22
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 5.86
264
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 223.34
TTFR rankings: 1308
Ratio Superior: 5.86
265
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.1
TTFR rankings: 350
Ratio Superior: 5.82
266
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.31
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 5.82
267
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.8
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 5.82
268
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 241.66
TTFR rankings: 1403
Ratio Superior: 5.81
269
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.24
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 5.8
270
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.73
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 5.78
271
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.77
272
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.73
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 5.74
273
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.23
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 5.73
274
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.84
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 5.73
275
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.49
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 5.71
276
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.53
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 5.71
277
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 5.7
278
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 84.17
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 5.69
279
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.23
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 5.68
280
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.81
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 5.67
281
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.02
TTFR rankings: 402
Ratio Superior: 5.66
282
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 283.34
TTFR rankings: 1603
Ratio Superior: 5.66
283
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.21
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.66
284
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.65
285
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 171.89
TTFR rankings: 969
Ratio Superior: 5.64
286
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.31
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 5.6
287
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.59
288
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.15
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 5.58
289
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 191.26
TTFR rankings: 1067
Ratio Superior: 5.58
290
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.62
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 5.57
291
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.7
TTFR rankings: 814
Ratio Superior: 5.55
292
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.46
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 5.54
293
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.65
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 5.51
294
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.46
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 5.5
295
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.02
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 5.48
296
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.48
297
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.48
298
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.34
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 5.48
299
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.57
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 5.48
300
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.38
TTFR rankings: 593
Ratio Superior: 5.47

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников