The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
301
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.49
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 5.49
302
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.07
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 5.48
303
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.74
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.47
304
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.97
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 5.46
305
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.31
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 5.46
306
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.14
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 5.46
307
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.81
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.45
308
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 33.82
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 5.44
309
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.05
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 5.44
310
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.41
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 5.42
311
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 5.42
312
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 199.35
TTFR rankings: 1078
Ratio Superior: 5.41
313
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.52
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.4
314
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.65
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 5.4
315
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.97
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 5.39
316
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.27
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 5.39
317
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.6
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 5.38
318
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 260.93
TTFR rankings: 1399
Ratio Superior: 5.36
319
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.32
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 5.35
320
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.08
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 5.34
321
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.97
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 5.34
322
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.12
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 5.33
323
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.31
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 5.33
324
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.14
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 5.32
325
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.97
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 5.31
326
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.4
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 5.3
327
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 5.3
328
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.01
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 5.29
329
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.49
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 5.29
330
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.04
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 5.27
331
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.16
TTFR rankings: 421
Ratio Superior: 5.25
332
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.41
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 5.25
333
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.52
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.24
334
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.96
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 5.23
335
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 214.4
TTFR rankings: 1120
Ratio Superior: 5.22
336
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.5
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 5.22
337
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 243.66
TTFR rankings: 1269
Ratio Superior: 5.21
338
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.08
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 5.2
339
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.12
TTFR rankings: 727
Ratio Superior: 5.19
340
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.47
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 5.19
341
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.71
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 5.19
342
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.48
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 5.17
343
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.96
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 5.17
344
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 256.34
TTFR rankings: 1324
Ratio Superior: 5.17
345
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.56
TTFR rankings: 539
Ratio Superior: 5.15
346
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.85
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 5.14
347
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.2
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 5.14
348
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.36
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 5.14
349
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.51
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 5.12
350
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.22
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 5.11
351
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.52
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 5.1
352
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.01
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 5.1
353
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.12
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 5.09
354
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.5
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 5.08
355
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.99
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 5.08
356
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.62
TTFR rankings: 383
Ratio Superior: 5.06
357
Age: 9
Average rating: 12.67
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 5.05
358
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.48
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 5.04
359
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 5.04
360
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.07
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 5.03
361
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.91
TTFR rankings: 356
Ratio Superior: 5.02
362
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 350.57
TTFR rankings: 1760
Ratio Superior: 5.02
363
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 5.02
364
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.11
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 5.02
365
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.16
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 5.01
366
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.36
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 5.01
367
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 4.99
368
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.97
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 4.98
369
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 13.05
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 4.98
370
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.65
TTFR rankings: 571
Ratio Superior: 4.98
371
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.68
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 4.97
372
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.09
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 4.96
373
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 161.34
TTFR rankings: 800
Ratio Superior: 4.96
374
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 4.95
375
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.19
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 4.95
376
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.94
377
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.51
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 4.94
378
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.63
TTFR rankings: 599
Ratio Superior: 4.92
379
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.96
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 4.92
380
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.97
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 4.91
381
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.15
TTFR rankings: 470
Ratio Superior: 4.89
382
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.07
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 4.88
383
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.52
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 4.86
384
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.49
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 4.82
385
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.55
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 4.81
386
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.04
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 4.81
387
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.52
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 4.81
388
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.16
TTFR rankings: 385
Ratio Superior: 4.8
389
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.19
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 4.8
390
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.59
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 4.8
391
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.41
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 4.8
392
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 106.79
TTFR rankings: 512
Ratio Superior: 4.79
393
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.12
TTFR rankings: 671
Ratio Superior: 4.79
394
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.49
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 4.79
395
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.63
TTFR rankings: 582
Ratio Superior: 4.79
396
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.77
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 4.76
397
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 172.84
TTFR rankings: 821
Ratio Superior: 4.75
398
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.59
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 4.75
399
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.54
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 4.75
400
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.31
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 4.74

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников