The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№201
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.73
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 6.85
№202
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.43
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 6.78
№203
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 6.7
№204
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.23
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 6.68
№205
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 6.66
№206
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.97
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.66
№207
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 281.81
TTFR rankings: 1876
Ratio Superior: 6.66
№208
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 186.23
TTFR rankings: 1236
Ratio Superior: 6.64
№209
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.41
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 6.63
№210
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.85
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 6.62
№211
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.41
TTFR rankings: 943
Ratio Superior: 6.62
№212
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.67
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 6.61
№213
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.72
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 6.61
№214
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.7
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 6.54
№215
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.32
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.52
№216
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.6
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№217
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.23
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№218
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.49
TTFR rankings: 523
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№219
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.42
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№220
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.8
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 6.49
№221
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.77
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 6.49
№222
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.32
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 6.47
№223
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.51
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.45
№224
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.32
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.45
№225
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 6.44
№226
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 172.55
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 6.43
№227
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.67
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 6.43
№228
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.23
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 6.42
№229
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.08
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 6.42
№230
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.4
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 6.4
№231
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.7
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 6.4
№232
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 6.38
№233
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 181.28
TTFR rankings: 1145
Ratio Superior: 6.32
№234
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.74
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№235
Age: 16
Average rating: 111.93
TTFR rankings: 700
Ratio Superior: 6.25
№236
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№237
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 152.72
TTFR rankings: 952
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№238
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 6.19
№239
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 298.06
TTFR rankings: 1842
Ratio Superior: 6.18
№240
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.21
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№241
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.77
TTFR rankings: 307
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№242
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 6.16
№243
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.43
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 6.16
№244
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.7
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 6.15
№245
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.57
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 6.14
№246
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.13
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 6.12
№247
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.68
TTFR rankings: 374
Ratio Superior: 6.06
№248
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 221.02
TTFR rankings: 1334
Ratio Superior: 6.04
№249
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 5.99
№250
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.42
TTFR rankings: 487
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№251
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.75
TTFR rankings: 465
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№252
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.89
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№253
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.8
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№254
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.15
TTFR rankings: 400
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№255
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.15
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 5.94
№256
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.83
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 5.92
№257
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 5.92
№258
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 164.09
TTFR rankings: 969
Ratio Superior: 5.91
№259
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.41
TTFR rankings: 356
Ratio Superior: 5.89
№260
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.95
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 5.89
№261
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.85
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 5.87
№262
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.41
TTFR rankings: 353
Ratio Superior: 5.84
№263
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.22
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№264
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 240.53
TTFR rankings: 1403
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№265
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.8
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№266
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.2
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№267
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 193.22
TTFR rankings: 1121
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№268
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.41
TTFR rankings: 350
Ratio Superior: 5.79
№269
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 226.3
TTFR rankings: 1308
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№270
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.08
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№271
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.32
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.77
№272
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.75
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№273
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.83
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№274
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 5.74
№275
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.27
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 5.73
№276
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.83
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 5.72
№277
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.21
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№278
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.51
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№279
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.6
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№280
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.02
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№281
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 84.03
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№282
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 281.81
TTFR rankings: 1603
Ratio Superior: 5.69
№283
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.76
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№284
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.7
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№285
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.34
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№286
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.22
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.65
№287
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.58
TTFR rankings: 402
Ratio Superior: 5.62
№288
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.25
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 5.61
№289
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 5.6
№290
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.32
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.6
№291
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.97
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 5.6
№292
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.44
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 5.59
№293
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 145.73
TTFR rankings: 814
Ratio Superior: 5.59
№294
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.22
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.56
№295
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.41
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 5.55
№296
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.51
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.54
№297
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.51
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.54
№298
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.34
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№299
Age: 16
Average rating: 111.93
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№300
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 193.22
TTFR rankings: 1067
Ratio Superior: 5.52
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников