The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1901
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.19
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.71
№1902
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.58
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.71
№1903
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.86
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.71
№1904
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 76.34
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.71
№1905
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.28
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.71
№1906
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.72
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.71
№1907
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 251.87
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 0.7
№1908
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 85.87
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 0.7
№1909
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.63
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.7
№1910
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.93
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1911
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 72.17
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1912
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.55
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1913
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1914
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.35
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1915
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.56
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1916
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.5
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1917
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 306.47
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 0.69
№1918
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.19
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1919
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.38
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1920
Age: 16
Average rating: 120.36
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1921
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 262.98
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1922
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.52
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1923
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.52
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1924
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 79.45
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1925
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 72.17
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1926
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 352.69
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1927
Age: 18
Average rating: 217
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1928
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.5
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.68
№1929
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.87
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1930
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 74.34
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1931
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.66
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1932
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.66
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1933
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.24
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1934
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.24
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1935
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 91.2
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1936
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 103.39
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1937
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 10.51
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.67
№1938
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 87.41
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.66
№1939
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 112.53
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 0.66
№1940
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.65
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.66
№1941
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.65
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.66
№1942
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.44
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1943
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1944
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.24
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1945
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.98
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1946
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.3
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1947
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 70.67
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1948
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.31
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1949
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.31
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1950
Age: 16
Average rating: 120.36
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1951
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.88
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1952
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.88
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1953
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 60.43
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.65
№1954
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.41
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1955
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.41
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1956
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 49.85
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1957
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 79.45
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1958
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 85.87
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1959
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.11
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1960
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1961
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1962
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1963
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.86
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1964
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.52
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1965
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 72.17
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1966
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 179.06
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.64
№1967
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.84
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1968
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.35
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1969
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.35
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1970
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 349.84
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1971
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.98
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1972
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 142.85
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1973
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 87.41
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1974
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.48
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1975
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.12
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1976
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.35
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1977
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 54.35
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1978
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.63
№1979
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.21
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1980
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.21
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1981
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.21
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1982
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.21
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1983
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 70.67
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1984
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.35
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1985
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 48.38
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1986
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 79.45
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1987
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.85
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1988
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.31
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1989
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.31
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1990
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.58
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1991
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 60.43
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1992
Age: 15
Average rating: 85.13
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1993
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 11.49
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1994
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.55
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1995
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 11.58
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1996
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 112.53
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1997
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 125.84
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1998
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 97.81
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1999
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 76.34
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№2000
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 76.34
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.6
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
