The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1901
Age: 20
Average rating: 360.32
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1902
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.12
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1903
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.02
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1904
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.33
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1905
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.59
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1906
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1907
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.21
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1908
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.21
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1909
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.21
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1910
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.21
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1911
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.4
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1912
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.49
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1913
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.47
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1914
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.29
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1915
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.59
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1916
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 46.12
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1917
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.95
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1918
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.95
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1919
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.59
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1920
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.07
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1921
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.7
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1922
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 73.05
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1923
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 73.05
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1924
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.29
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1925
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 325.23
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1926
Age: 17
Average rating: 146.71
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1927
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.08
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1928
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.09
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1929
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.33
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1930
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 156.39
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1931
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.59
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1932
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.02
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1933
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.02
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1934
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.58
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1935
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.22
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1936
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.22
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1937
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.72
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1938
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.07
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1939
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.33
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1940
Age: 18
Average rating: 204.43
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1941
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.7
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1942
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.95
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1943
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 263.29
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1944
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.39
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1945
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.23
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1946
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1947
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.24
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1948
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1949
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.89
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1950
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.89
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1951
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 253.37
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1952
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.74
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1953
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 120.66
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1954
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.22
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1955
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.26
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1956
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.24
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1957
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 211.49
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1958
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 11.45
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1959
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 11.45
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1960
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.02
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1961
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.91
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1962
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.06
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1963
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 180.45
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1964
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.7
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1965
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.99
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1966
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 297.33
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1967
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1968
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1969
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.59
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1970
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.3
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1971
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.91
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1972
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.91
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1973
Age: 20
Average rating: 360.32
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1974
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.67
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1975
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.58
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1976
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 12.88
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1977
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 191.11
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1978
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107.96
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1979
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1980
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.21
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1981
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.95
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1982
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.95
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1983
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.09
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1984
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 355.06
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1985
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.51
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1986
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.77
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1987
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.22
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1988
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 160.77
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1989
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.74
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1990
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.99
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1991
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 358.09
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1992
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 131.07
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1993
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.47
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1994
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.47
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1995
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.47
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1996
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.91
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1997
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.56
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.82
№1998
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.51
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 0.82
№1999
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 120.66
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 0.82
№2000
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.06
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.82
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
