The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1801
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.68
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1802
Age: 10
Average rating: 16.33
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1803
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 103.62
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1804
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.27
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1805
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.81
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1806
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 192.48
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1807
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 67.58
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1808
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 61.25
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1809
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.57
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1810
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1811
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.84
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1812
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.76
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1813
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.76
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1814
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 152.23
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1815
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.02
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1816
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.09
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1817
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.09
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1818
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 158.02
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1819
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 16.56
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1820
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.89
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1821
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1822
Age: 16
Average rating: 106.77
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1823
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 95.77
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1824
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 361.24
TTFR rankings: 392
Ratio Superior: 1.09
1825
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.17
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1826
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.17
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1827
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 89.61
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1828
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.68
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1829
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.46
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1830
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.5
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1831
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.31
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1832
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 13.93
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1833
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 16.72
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1834
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 172.83
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1835
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.76
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1836
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 205.46
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.08
1837
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 249.52
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1838
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 342.21
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1839
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 57.91
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1840
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.56
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1841
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 262.15
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1842
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 66.54
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1843
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.81
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.07
1844
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 244.26
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1845
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.62
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1846
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 60.23
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1847
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 60.23
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1848
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.84
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1849
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.86
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1850
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.86
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1851
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.86
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1852
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.72
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1853
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.86
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1854
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.4
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1855
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 16.08
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1856
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.46
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1857
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.84
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1858
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.43
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.06
1859
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 15.17
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1860
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 172.83
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1861
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.76
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1862
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.35
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1863
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1864
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1865
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1866
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.17
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1867
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 294.87
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1868
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.05
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1869
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 73.54
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1870
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.93
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1871
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.93
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1872
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 342.21
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1873
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 284.05
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1874
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.62
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1875
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 70.92
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1876
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 342.25
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1877
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.17
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1878
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.06
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1879
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.2
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1880
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.09
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1881
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 79.4
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1882
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 227.87
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1883
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.89
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1884
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.93
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1885
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 14.57
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1886
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 14.57
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1887
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 14.57
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1888
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 17.5
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1889
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1890
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 57.91
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1891
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 15.73
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1892
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.5
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1893
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 70.92
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1894
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 152.23
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1895
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1896
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1897
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.17
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1898
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.76
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1899
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.76
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1900
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 74.41
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.01

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников