The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1801
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.45
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1802
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 358.08
TTFR rankings: 375
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1803
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 267.62
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1804
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 297.31
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1805
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.05
1806
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.85
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1807
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 120.26
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1808
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.59
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1809
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.59
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1810
Age: 19
Average rating: 286.39
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1811
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1812
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 355.05
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1813
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.89
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1814
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.53
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1815
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.8
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1816
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.56
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1817
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.01
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1818
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 177.19
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1819
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 253.35
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1820
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.64
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1821
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.24
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1822
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.58
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1823
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 150.94
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1824
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.5
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1825
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.64
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1826
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.64
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1827
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 183.31
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1828
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1829
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.18
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1830
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 159.8
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1831
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.84
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1832
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.39
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1833
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.84
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1834
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.56
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1835
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.43
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1836
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1
1837
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.99
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1
1838
Age: 7.4
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1
1839
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 355.05
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 1
1840
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.2
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1
1841
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.43
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1842
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 115.66
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1843
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.15
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1844
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.2
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1845
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.15
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1846
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 11.14
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1847
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 11.15
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1848
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.25
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1849
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.25
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1850
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.9
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1851
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.29
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1852
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.5
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1853
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.72
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1854
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.8
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1855
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.8
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1856
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.24
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1857
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.92
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1858
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.08
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1859
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.59
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1860
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.39
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1861
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 173.56
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1862
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.96
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1863
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.96
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1864
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.21
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1865
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.7
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1866
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.7
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1867
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1868
Age: 17
Average rating: 146.37
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1869
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.69
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1870
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.53
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1871
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.58
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1872
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1873
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1874
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.73
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1875
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.38
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1876
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.21
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1877
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1878
Age: 20
Average rating: 360.31
TTFR rankings: 345
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1879
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.88
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1880
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.29
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1881
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.2
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1882
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.19
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1883
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.46
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1884
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 368.28
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1885
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 12.6
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1886
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.87
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1887
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 267.62
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1888
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.81
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1889
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.56
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1890
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.2
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1891
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.84
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1892
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.84
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1893
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.15
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1894
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.01
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1895
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.39
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1896
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.73
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1897
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.95
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1898
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.95
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1899
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1900
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 180.99
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 0.93

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников