The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1801
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.39
1802
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.57
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.39
1803
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 217.42
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 0.39
1804
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.1
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.39
1805
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.1
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.39
1806
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.82
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1807
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.35
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1808
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1809
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.9
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1810
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.9
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1811
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 178.15
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1812
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.71
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1813
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 188.89
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1814
Age: 10
Average rating: 21
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1815
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 89.76
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.38
1816
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.48
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1817
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.78
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1818
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.46
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1819
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.46
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1820
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1821
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 234.25
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1822
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 129.4
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1823
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1824
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1825
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 159.27
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1826
Age: 16
Average rating: 138.43
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1827
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.78
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1828
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.78
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1829
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 35.42
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1830
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.82
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1831
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1832
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1833
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.88
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1834
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.18
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1835
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.65
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.37
1836
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.36
1837
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.36
1838
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.36
1839
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.36
1840
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.36
1841
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 70.49
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1842
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1843
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.38
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1844
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 179.52
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1845
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 234.25
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1846
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20.14
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1847
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 20.22
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.35
1848
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.84
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1849
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1850
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.25
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1851
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 23.25
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1852
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 20.37
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1853
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.63
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1854
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.9
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1855
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 20.42
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1856
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 87.59
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1857
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 102.25
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1858
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1859
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1860
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 20.59
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1861
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 20.64
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1862
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.57
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1863
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.82
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.34
1864
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.9
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1865
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.9
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1866
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.48
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1867
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.63
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1868
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.18
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1869
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1870
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.84
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1871
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.71
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1872
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.33
1873
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1874
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.33
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1875
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 31.1
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1876
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.78
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1877
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.78
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1878
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 112.18
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1879
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.38
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1880
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1881
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1882
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.85
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1883
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 41.18
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1884
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 44.35
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1885
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.32
1886
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.31
1887
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.31
1888
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.27
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.31
1889
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1890
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.63
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1891
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.48
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1892
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.78
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1893
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 26.78
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1894
Age: 17
Average rating: 187.75
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1895
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1896
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1897
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1898
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 151.03
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1899
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 60.48
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.3
1900
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.29

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников