The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1801
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1802
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.95
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1803
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.42
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1804
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.38
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1805
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.38
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1806
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 5.5
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1807
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1808
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.98
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.73
1809
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.81
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1810
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1811
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 55.38
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1812
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 117.85
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1813
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.91
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1814
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.91
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1815
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.45
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1816
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.95
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1817
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.91
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1818
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1819
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1820
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.48
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1821
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.93
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1822
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9.78
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.72
1823
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 153.13
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 0.71
1824
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.49
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.71
1825
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.71
1826
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.71
1827
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 218.9
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 0.71
1828
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.81
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.71
1829
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.53
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1830
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.53
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1831
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 294.02
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1832
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.37
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1833
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.48
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1834
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.48
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1835
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.9
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1836
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.98
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1837
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 211.44
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1838
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.92
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1839
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 282.3
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1840
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 126.32
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1841
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 126.32
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1842
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.05
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1843
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.38
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1844
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.38
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.7
1845
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.59
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1846
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.59
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1847
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.51
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1848
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.99
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1849
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 204.59
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1850
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.35
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1851
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.81
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1852
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1853
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 55.38
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1854
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 55.38
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1855
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 13.13
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.69
1856
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 98.54
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 0.68
1857
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.66
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.68
1858
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.16
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.68
1859
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 175.38
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1860
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.96
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1861
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 5.95
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1862
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 5.95
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1863
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.66
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1864
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.33
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1865
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1866
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.93
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1867
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.93
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1868
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.99
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1869
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 379.85
TTFR rankings: 253
Ratio Superior: 0.67
1870
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.05
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1871
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.35
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1872
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.37
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1873
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.37
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1874
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.48
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1875
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1876
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.95
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1877
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.95
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1878
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.96
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 0.66
1879
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 355.98
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1880
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.31
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1881
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 101.04
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1882
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.81
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1883
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1884
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.62
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1885
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.91
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1886
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.95
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.65
1887
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.82
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.64
1888
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.49
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.64
1889
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 409.26
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 0.64
1890
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.84
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.64
1891
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 282.3
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 0.64
1892
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.63
1893
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 71.13
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.63
1894
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.63
1895
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.63
1896
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.63
1897
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.63
1898
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 101.04
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.62
1899
Age: 17
Average rating: 182.96
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.62
1900
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.62
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 0.62

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников