The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1901
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.62
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1902
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.39
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1903
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 98.65
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1904
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9.71
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1905
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.48
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1906
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 142.85
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1907
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 217.56
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 0.62
№1908
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 101.04
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1909
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1910
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1911
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1912
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1913
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1914
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.39
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1915
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.19
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1916
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 406.27
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1917
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 92.29
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1918
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.6
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.61
№1919
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 319.17
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1920
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.98
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1921
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 140.11
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1922
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1923
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1924
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.37
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1925
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.39
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1926
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.72
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.6
№1927
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 148.16
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1928
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 218.9
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1929
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.05
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1930
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.05
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1931
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1932
Age: 14
Average rating: 69.39
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1933
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1934
Age: 11
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1935
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.51
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1936
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 175.38
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 0.59
№1937
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.43
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1938
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.3
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1939
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.3
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1940
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.3
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1941
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.47
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1942
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.4
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1943
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.92
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1944
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.19
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1945
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.92
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1946
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.84
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.58
№1947
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.63
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1948
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.63
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1949
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.2
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1950
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.55
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1951
Age: 13
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1952
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.04
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1953
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.84
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1954
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 117.85
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1955
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.37
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1956
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 116.62
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1957
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.84
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.57
№1958
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1959
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1960
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 198.71
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1961
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1962
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1963
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.92
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1964
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.49
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1965
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 80.62
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1966
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.25
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1967
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 116.62
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1968
Age: 16
Average rating: 129.33
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 0.56
№1969
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.5
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1970
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.64
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1971
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.64
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1972
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1973
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1974
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.58
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1975
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.58
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1976
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.62
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1977
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.39
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1978
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.37
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1979
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 198.71
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1980
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.19
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.55
№1981
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.39
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.54
№1982
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.54
№1983
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.22
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.54
№1984
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.07
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.54
№1985
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.88
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.54
№1986
Age: 8
Average rating: 5.59
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.54
№1987
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.84
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1988
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.55
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1989
Age: 11
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1990
Age: 11
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1991
Age: 13
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1992
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 119.86
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1993
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.84
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.53
№1994
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.37
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.52
№1995
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.37
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.52
№1996
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.37
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.52
№1997
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 174.39
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 0.52
№1998
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 71.14
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.52
№1999
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 292.78
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 0.52
№2000
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.43
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.52
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
