The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1901
Age: 10
Average rating: 20.84
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.29
№1902
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 156.94
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.29
№1903
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 177.95
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.29
№1904
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1905
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.23
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1906
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.63
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1907
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.32
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1908
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1909
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 75.15
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1910
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.64
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1911
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.28
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1912
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.68
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1913
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.68
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1914
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.62
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1915
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 264.31
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1916
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1917
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.58
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1918
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1919
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1920
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1921
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.66
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1922
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1923
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1924
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1925
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.6
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1926
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.43
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1927
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1928
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1929
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1930
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1931
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.73
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1932
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.99
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1933
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.87
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1934
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.68
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1935
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1936
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 56.93
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1937
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 19.08
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1938
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1939
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.79
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1940
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 198.64
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1941
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.41
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1942
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.43
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1943
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.38
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1944
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.64
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1945
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 66.99
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1946
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 106.85
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1947
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.66
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1948
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.66
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1949
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1950
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 19.98
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1951
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 20.03
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1952
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 188.7
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1953
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1954
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1955
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 20.49
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1956
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.63
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1957
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.39
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1958
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.61
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1959
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.43
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1960
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.76
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1961
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.76
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1962
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.41
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1963
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.66
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1964
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1965
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1966
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.53
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1967
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.32
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1968
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.32
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1969
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1970
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1971
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1972
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.8
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1973
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.68
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1974
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 173.95
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1975
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1976
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 70.52
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1977
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.39
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1978
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 89.77
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1979
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.5
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1980
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 59.51
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1981
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.45
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1982
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.43
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1983
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.73
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1984
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.28
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1985
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 56.93
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1986
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 94.93
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1987
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 128.25
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1988
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1989
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1990
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1991
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.93
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1992
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.58
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1993
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 173.95
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1994
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.21
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1995
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1996
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.63
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1997
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.7
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1998
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.7
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1999
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 19.98
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№2000
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.2
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
