The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1901
Age: 10
Average rating: 20.94
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.29
№1902
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 157.25
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.29
№1903
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 178.23
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.29
№1904
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 49.33
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1905
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.67
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1906
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.16
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1907
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.41
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1908
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.48
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1909
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 75.25
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1910
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 25.35
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1911
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.73
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1912
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 50.72
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1913
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 264.49
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1914
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.81
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1915
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.81
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.28
№1916
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.84
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1917
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.68
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1918
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.75
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1919
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.27
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1920
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.27
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1921
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.27
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1922
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.37
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1923
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.37
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1924
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.37
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1925
Age: 12
Average rating: 36.72
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1926
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.51
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1927
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.87
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1928
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.87
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1929
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.87
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1930
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.87
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1931
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.83
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1932
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 67.1
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1933
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 63.98
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.27
№1934
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 37.8
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1935
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 56.86
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1936
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 22.78
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1937
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 19.21
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1938
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1939
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 198.88
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1940
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 42.9
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1941
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.52
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1942
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.5
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1943
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 27.45
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.26
№1944
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 78.74
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1945
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 67.1
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1946
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 107.02
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1947
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.75
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1948
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.75
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1949
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 24
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1950
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1951
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 188.96
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1952
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 20.16
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1953
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 40.37
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1954
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 20.37
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.25
№1955
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.67
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1956
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.49
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1957
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 20.6
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1958
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 20.72
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1959
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 99.51
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1960
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 62.52
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1961
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1962
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1963
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 87.75
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1964
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 84.62
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1965
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.16
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1966
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 21.16
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.24
№1967
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.41
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1968
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 21.41
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1969
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.48
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1970
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 21.48
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1971
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.87
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1972
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 25.87
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1973
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 174.24
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1974
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 21.81
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1975
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 21.84
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1976
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 56.86
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1977
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 70.63
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.23
№1978
Age: 13
Average rating: 53.49
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1979
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 89.86
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1980
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 45.6
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.22
№1981
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 32.58
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1982
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 23.5
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1983
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 51.83
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1984
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 28.35
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1985
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 56.86
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1986
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 95.02
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1987
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 128.39
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1988
Age: 14
Average rating: 76.68
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1989
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 24
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1990
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 24
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1991
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 24
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1992
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1993
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 174.24
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1994
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 24.28
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.21
№1995
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 29.27
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1996
Age: 11
Average rating: 24.67
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1997
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1998
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№1999
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 20.1
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.2
№2000
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 20.18
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.2
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
