The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1601
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1602
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.04
1603
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 205.8
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1604
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.47
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1605
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.47
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1606
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.8
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1607
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.15
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.03
1608
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 40.01
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1609
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1610
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.8
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1611
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.94
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1612
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.84
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 1.02
1613
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 176.6
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1614
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.54
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1615
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 83.95
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1616
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1617
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.51
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1618
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 192.34
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1619
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 147.8
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1620
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.67
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1621
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.89
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.01
1622
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 215.21
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 1
1623
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1
1624
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 81.94
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1
1625
Age: 7.3
Average rating: 5
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 1
1626
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.25
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1627
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.38
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1628
Age: 17
Average rating: 184.35
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1629
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 116.62
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1630
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.67
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.99
1631
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.36
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1632
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 80.5
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1633
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.47
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1634
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.78
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1635
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.58
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1636
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.27
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1637
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 119.85
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 0.98
1638
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 401.22
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1639
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 163.22
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1640
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 177.66
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1641
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.4
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1642
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.4
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1643
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 277.48
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 0.97
1644
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.38
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1645
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 176.6
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1646
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.86
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1647
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.86
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1648
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.26
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1649
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.83
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1650
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 414.63
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1651
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.54
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.96
1652
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.08
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.95
1653
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.7
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1654
Age: 17
Average rating: 184.35
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1655
Age: 13
Average rating: 45.61
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1656
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.69
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1657
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.69
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1658
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.58
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1659
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.67
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1660
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1661
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.84
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1662
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 195.65
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 0.94
1663
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.72
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1664
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.26
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1665
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.26
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1666
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.5
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1667
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.5
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1668
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.36
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1669
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.55
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1670
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.94
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1671
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.94
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1672
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.54
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1673
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 119.85
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 0.93
1674
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 117.84
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1675
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.27
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1676
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 243.81
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1677
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.86
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1678
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.4
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1679
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 119.85
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1680
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 296.04
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 0.92
1681
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.04
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1682
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.04
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1683
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 212.62
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1684
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.83
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1685
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 182.01
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1686
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1687
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 60.37
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1688
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1689
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 201.91
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1690
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 176.6
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1691
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.4
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1692
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.4
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.91
1693
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.47
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1694
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 277.68
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1695
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.4
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1696
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 92.2
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1697
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 40.01
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1698
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1699
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.13
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.9
1700
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 122.47
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 0.9

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников