The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1601
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.26
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1602
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.26
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1603
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1604
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.84
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1605
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.46
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1606
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1607
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 130.01
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1608
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.69
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1609
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.05
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1610
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.6
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1611
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.01
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1612
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 99.69
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1613
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 96.49
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1614
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.45
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1615
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.29
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1616
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.29
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1617
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.29
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1618
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.84
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1619
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.69
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1620
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.88
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1621
Age: 17
Average rating: 175.83
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1622
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 4.13
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1623
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 4.13
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1624
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 110.82
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1625
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 374.92
TTFR rankings: 452
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1626
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1627
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 127.11
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1628
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 96.49
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1629
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.58
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1630
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 48.47
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1631
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 90.38
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1632
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 99.69
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1633
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 117.44
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1634
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 187.2
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1635
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.05
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1636
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 63.88
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1637
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1638
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.69
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1639
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 3.38
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1640
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 96.49
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1641
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 5.08
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1642
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1643
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1644
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.04
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1645
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№1646
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 191.49
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 1.17
№1647
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.56
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.17
№1648
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.6
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.17
№1649
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.46
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.17
№1650
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 120.28
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№1651
Age: 18
Average rating: 211.84
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№1652
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.19
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№1653
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№1654
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.84
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№1655
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 6.94
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№1656
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.8
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№1657
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 222.24
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№1658
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.19
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№1659
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 207.01
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1660
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.69
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1661
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.01
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1662
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.01
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1663
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 58.78
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1664
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.19
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1665
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.45
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1666
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.45
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№1667
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 400.11
TTFR rankings: 454
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№1668
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.05
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№1669
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.88
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№1670
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 76.99
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№1671
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№1672
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.69
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1673
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1674
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 3.58
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1675
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1676
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 152.22
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1677
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1678
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 130.01
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№1679
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 11.66
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№1680
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 48.47
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№1681
Age: 18
Average rating: 211.84
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№1682
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.14
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№1683
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.3
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1684
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.3
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1685
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.59
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1686
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1687
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 168.97
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1688
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.69
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1689
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 168.97
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1690
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 55.74
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1691
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 99.69
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1692
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 114.46
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1693
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1694
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 167.82
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1695
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 192.64
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1696
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 11.97
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1697
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 115.15
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1698
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.36
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№1699
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.6
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№1700
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.08
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
