The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1501
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 56.88
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1502
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.32
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1503
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.75
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1504
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 152.14
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1505
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 67.8
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1506
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 59.87
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1507
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.47
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1508
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 237.62
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1509
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 5.08
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1510
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.04
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1511
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 56.88
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1512
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.17
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1513
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 8.79
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1514
Age: 14
Average rating: 65.95
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1515
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 206.95
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1516
Age: 15
Average rating: 92.74
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1517
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 7.37
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1518
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 84.87
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1519
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 9.6
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1520
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 99.74
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1521
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 118.31
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1522
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.5
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1523
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1524
Age: 16
Average rating: 123.67
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1525
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.75
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1526
Age: 11
Average rating: 15.58
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1527
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.34
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1528
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 127.02
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1529
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 44.57
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1530
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.17
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1531
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 178.33
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1532
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.32
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1533
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.6
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1534
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 11.97
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1535
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.72
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1536
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.72
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1537
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 222.18
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1538
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 168.9
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1539
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 69.83
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1540
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.29
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1541
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 129.92
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1542
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 187.14
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1543
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 72.35
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1544
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.91
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1545
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.41
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1546
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.88
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1547
Age: 14
Average rating: 65.95
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1548
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 7.6
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1549
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1550
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 149.94
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1551
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 247.19
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1552
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 105.32
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1553
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 55.77
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1554
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 129.92
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1555
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 8.43
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1556
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 8.43
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1557
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.09
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1558
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.3
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1559
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.88
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1560
Age: 18
Average rating: 211.78
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1561
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.73
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1562
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 6.94
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1563
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 84.87
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1564
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 114.36
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1565
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 369.19
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1566
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.93
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1567
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 11.66
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1568
Age: 8
Average rating: 3.11
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1569
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.34
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1570
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.7
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1571
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 127.02
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1572
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 63.91
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1573
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.02
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1574
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.67
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1575
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 216.55
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1576
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 204.13
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1577
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 4.7
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1578
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 10.19
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1579
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.75
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.28
1580
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 96.54
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1581
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.41
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1582
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 55.77
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1583
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 84.87
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1584
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 72.35
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1585
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 158.19
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1586
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.29
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1587
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.05
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1588
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.7
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.27
1589
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.91
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.26
1590
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 115.05
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.26
1591
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.08
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.26
1592
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.5
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.26
1593
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 6.37
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 1.26
1594
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 8.79
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.25
1595
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 8.79
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.25
1596
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.24
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.25
1597
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.05
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.25
1598
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 72.35
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.24
1599
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.47
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.24
1600
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 118.31
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.24

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников