The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1501
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 367.63
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1502
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 35.58
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1503
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1504
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.55
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1505
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 215.47
TTFR rankings: 326
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1506
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1507
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 7.3
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1508
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.2
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1509
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 76.46
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1510
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 367.63
TTFR rankings: 552
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1511
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1512
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 10.68
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1513
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 8.02
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1514
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.19
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1515
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.44
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1516
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.13
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1517
Age: 14
Average rating: 59.03
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1518
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 62.47
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1519
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.17
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1520
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.25
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1521
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 158.89
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1522
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.23
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1523
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 51.97
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1524
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 269.51
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1525
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 178.35
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1526
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 20.95
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1527
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 238.95
TTFR rankings: 353
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1528
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.19
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1529
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 11.54
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1530
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 40.87
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1531
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.89
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1532
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 119.4
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1533
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1534
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1535
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.19
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1536
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 65.24
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1537
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.44
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1538
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.44
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1539
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.77
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1540
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.02
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1541
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1542
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.72
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1543
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 136.25
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1544
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 195.23
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1545
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.25
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1546
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.11
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1547
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.77
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1548
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1549
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.72
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1550
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 169.35
TTFR rankings: 243
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1551
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 35.58
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1552
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 92.93
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1553
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.18
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1554
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.15
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1555
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 76.46
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1556
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 76.46
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1557
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.77
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1558
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 3.51
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1559
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.87
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1560
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.65
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1561
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1562
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.63
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1563
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 11.99
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1564
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 7.76
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1565
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 289.96
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1566
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 148.9
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1567
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 231.52
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1568
Age: 17
Average rating: 154.18
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1569
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.65
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1570
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.65
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1571
Age: 10
Average rating: 9.22
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1572
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 73.81
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1573
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 85.34
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1574
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1575
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.63
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1576
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 16.53
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1577
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.2
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1578
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 92.93
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1579
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.57
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1580
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.57
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1581
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.57
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1582
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.4
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1583
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.13
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1584
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.16
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1585
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 20.95
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1586
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 163.38
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1587
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 5.08
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1588
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 35.58
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1589
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1590
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.44
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1591
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.66
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1592
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 40.87
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1593
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 181.77
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1594
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 236.92
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1595
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 201.14
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1596
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.44
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1597
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 6.59
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1598
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.9
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1599
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 65.24
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1600
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.77
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 1.36

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников