The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
501
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.13
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.14
502
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 110.27
TTFR rankings: 456
Ratio Superior: 4.14
503
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.51
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 4.13
504
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.86
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 4.13
505
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.38
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 4.13
506
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 20.38
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 4.12
507
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.82
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 4.11
508
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.26
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 4.1
509
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 17.37
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 4.09
510
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 103.82
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 4.07
511
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.01
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 4.06
512
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.37
TTFR rankings: 403
Ratio Superior: 4.06
513
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.03
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 4.05
514
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.03
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 4.05
515
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.18
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 4.04
516
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 135.04
TTFR rankings: 546
Ratio Superior: 4.04
517
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.26
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 4.04
518
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.73
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 4.04
519
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.77
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.04
520
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 131.44
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 4.02
521
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.5
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 4.02
522
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 95.88
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 4.01
523
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 206.97
TTFR rankings: 828
Ratio Superior: 4
524
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 4
525
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 58.28
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 4
526
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 290.22
TTFR rankings: 1160
Ratio Superior: 4
527
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.03
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 3.99
528
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.21
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 3.96
529
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.78
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 3.95
530
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.28
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 3.94
531
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 16.76
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 3.94
532
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.13
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 3.94
533
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 18.31
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.93
534
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 135.04
TTFR rankings: 531
Ratio Superior: 3.93
535
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 14.54
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 3.92
536
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.01
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 3.92
537
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 16.59
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 3.92
538
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 70.96
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 3.92
539
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.15
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 3.91
540
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 125.66
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 3.91
541
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.8
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 3.9
542
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 330.56
TTFR rankings: 1289
Ratio Superior: 3.9
543
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 70.96
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 3.89
544
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.01
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 3.88
545
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.73
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 3.88
546
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 18.63
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.86
547
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.26
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 3.85
548
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 19.5
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.85
549
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 15.34
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.85
550
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 60.14
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 3.84
551
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.15
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 3.84
552
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.98
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 3.84
553
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 79.59
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 3.82
554
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.21
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 3.82
555
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 158.81
TTFR rankings: 606
Ratio Superior: 3.82
556
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.81
557
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.13
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 3.81
558
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 356.79
TTFR rankings: 1359
Ratio Superior: 3.81
559
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.36
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.81
560
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.77
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 3.8
561
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.34
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 3.8
562
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 3.8
563
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 3.8
564
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 3.8
565
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 3.8
566
Age: 19
Average rating: 277.02
TTFR rankings: 1050
Ratio Superior: 3.79
567
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.59
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 3.78
568
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 85.64
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 3.78
569
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 20.38
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 3.78
570
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.51
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 3.77
571
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.71
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 3.77
572
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 60.14
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 3.76
573
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.16
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 3.76
574
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.84
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 3.75
575
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 16.03
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 3.74
576
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 16.03
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 3.74
577
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 58.28
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 3.74
578
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.28
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 3.74
579
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.13
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 3.73
580
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 15.56
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.73
581
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 3.73
582
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.21
TTFR rankings: 432
Ratio Superior: 3.72
583
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 90.44
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 3.72
584
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.16
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 3.71
585
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.86
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 3.71
586
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.36
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 3.7
587
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.18
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.7
588
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 90.44
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 3.69
589
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 19.5
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.69
590
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.51
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 3.68
591
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 158.81
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 3.65
592
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 55.18
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 3.64
593
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 69.19
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 3.63
594
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 317.5
TTFR rankings: 1151
Ratio Superior: 3.63
595
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 149.29
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 3.62
596
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.62
597
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 95.88
TTFR rankings: 347
Ratio Superior: 3.62
598
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 16.03
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.62
599
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 14.65
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.62
600
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.38
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 3.62

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников