The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№401
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.15
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 4.73
№402
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.5
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 4.71
№403
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.23
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 4.7
№404
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.23
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 4.7
№405
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.54
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 4.69
№406
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.99
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 4.69
№407
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.13
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 4.69
№408
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 161.37
TTFR rankings: 756
Ratio Superior: 4.68
№409
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.47
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 4.68
№410
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.53
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 4.67
№411
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.26
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 4.67
№412
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.49
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.65
№413
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.05
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 4.65
№414
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.19
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 4.64
№415
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.29
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 4.63
№416
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.5
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 4.62
№417
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.5
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 4.62
№418
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.69
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 4.62
№419
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.64
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 4.62
№420
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.02
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 4.61
№421
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.49
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 4.61
№422
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.12
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 4.59
№423
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.09
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 4.59
№424
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.76
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 4.59
№425
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.94
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 4.59
№426
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 129.36
TTFR rankings: 593
Ratio Superior: 4.58
№427
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 33.83
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 4.58
№428
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.5
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 4.58
№429
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 4.57
№430
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.54
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 4.56
№431
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.46
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 4.55
№432
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.23
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 4.55
№433
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 4.55
№434
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.51
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 4.54
№435
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 4.54
№436
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.27
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 4.53
№437
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.73
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 4.53
№438
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.16
TTFR rankings: 634
Ratio Superior: 4.52
№439
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.71
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 4.52
№440
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.81
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4.52
№441
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.1
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 4.52
№442
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.48
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 4.52
№443
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.02
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 4.51
№444
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.5
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 4.51
№445
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.73
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 4.5
№446
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.16
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 4.5
№447
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.63
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 4.49
№448
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.43
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 4.49
№449
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.46
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 4.49
№450
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 171.54
TTFR rankings: 769
Ratio Superior: 4.48
№451
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.37
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 4.47
№452
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.99
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 4.46
№453
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 133.53
TTFR rankings: 595
Ratio Superior: 4.46
№454
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.61
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 4.44
№455
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.88
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 4.44
№456
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.71
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 4.44
№457
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.29
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4.4
№458
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.73
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 4.4
№459
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.69
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 4.39
№460
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.86
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 4.39
№461
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.09
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 4.38
№462
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.09
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 4.38
№463
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.53
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 4.38
№464
Age: 16
Average rating: 110.87
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 4.37
№465
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.46
TTFR rankings: 316
Ratio Superior: 4.36
№466
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.43
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 4.36
№467
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.63
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 4.36
№468
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.48
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 4.36
№469
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 4.32
№470
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.09
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 4.31
№471
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.56
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 4.31
№472
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.99
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 4.29
№473
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.99
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 4.28
№474
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.29
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 4.28
№475
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.58
TTFR rankings: 626
Ratio Superior: 4.27
№476
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.88
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 4.27
№477
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4.26
№478
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.26
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 4.25
№479
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.53
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.25
№480
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.99
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 4.25
№481
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.34
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 4.24
№482
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.61
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 4.23
№483
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.19
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 4.23
№484
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 4.22
№485
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.12
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 4.21
№486
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 124.33
TTFR rankings: 523
Ratio Superior: 4.21
№487
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.88
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 4.2
№488
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.09
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 4.2
№489
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 4.2
№490
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.35
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 4.19
№491
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 161.37
TTFR rankings: 674
Ratio Superior: 4.18
№492
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.61
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 4.18
№493
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.61
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 4.17
№494
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.94
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 4.16
№495
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.13
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 4.16
№496
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 12.78
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 4.15
№497
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.6
TTFR rankings: 433
Ratio Superior: 4.14
№498
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.17
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 4.13
№499
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.67
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 4.12
№500
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.71
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 4.12
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
