The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№201
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 65.11
TTFR rankings: 424
Ratio Superior: 6.51
№202
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 112.95
TTFR rankings: 734
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№203
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 86.83
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 6.38
№204
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.34
TTFR rankings: 429
Ratio Superior: 6.37
№205
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 129.05
TTFR rankings: 819
Ratio Superior: 6.35
№206
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.58
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 6.32
№207
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 97.38
TTFR rankings: 615
Ratio Superior: 6.32
№208
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 60.29
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№209
Age: 14
Average rating: 61.92
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 6.28
№210
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 184.1
TTFR rankings: 1153
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№211
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 171.53
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№212
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 297.73
TTFR rankings: 1860
Ratio Superior: 6.25
№213
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 153.24
TTFR rankings: 946
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№214
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.32
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№215
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.66
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.14
№216
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.59
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№217
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.51
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№218
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.49
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 6.12
№219
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 191.65
TTFR rankings: 1171
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№220
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 6.1
№221
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 184.1
TTFR rankings: 1122
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№222
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 115.85
TTFR rankings: 705
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№223
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.49
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 6.08
№224
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.01
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.06
№225
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 6.05
№226
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.18
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 6.03
№227
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.79
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 6.02
№228
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 231.66
TTFR rankings: 1391
Ratio Superior: 6
№229
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.01
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6
№230
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.01
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6
№231
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.4
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№232
Age: 15
Average rating: 84.48
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№233
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 231.66
TTFR rankings: 1382
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№234
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.18
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№235
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 82.59
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 5.95
№236
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.43
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 5.94
№237
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.54
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№238
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 63.94
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 5.91
№239
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.27
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 5.88
№240
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 197.64
TTFR rankings: 1161
Ratio Superior: 5.87
№241
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.63
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№242
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 246.23
TTFR rankings: 1431
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№243
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.43
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 5.79
№244
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.91
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.79
№245
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.95
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№246
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.4
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 5.77
№247
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 312.2
TTFR rankings: 1799
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№248
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.06
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№249
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.99
TTFR rankings: 394
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№250
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.78
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№251
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.49
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№252
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.18
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№253
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.48
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 5.66
№254
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.75
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 5.65
№255
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.25
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 5.63
№256
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 197.64
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 5.62
№257
Age: 15
Average rating: 84.48
TTFR rankings: 473
Ratio Superior: 5.6
№258
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.09
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.59
№259
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 5.58
№260
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.78
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 5.57
№261
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 203.18
TTFR rankings: 1131
Ratio Superior: 5.57
№262
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.32
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 5.56
№263
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.87
TTFR rankings: 435
Ratio Superior: 5.52
№264
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.43
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 5.51
№265
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.92
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 5.5
№266
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.95
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 5.5
№267
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.5
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 5.49
№268
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.78
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№269
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.18
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№270
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.84
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№271
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.73
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№272
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 63.94
TTFR rankings: 349
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№273
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 52.95
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№274
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.12
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 5.45
№275
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.51
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 5.45
№276
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.43
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 5.44
№277
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 91.05
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 5.43
№278
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 355.02
TTFR rankings: 1926
Ratio Superior: 5.43
№279
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.13
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 5.42
№280
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.63
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.41
№281
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.01
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 5.4
№282
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.18
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.39
№283
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.33
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 5.39
№284
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.45
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 5.38
№285
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 70.19
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 5.37
№286
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.37
№287
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.25
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 5.36
№288
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 177.97
TTFR rankings: 953
Ratio Superior: 5.35
№289
Age: 17
Average rating: 162.73
TTFR rankings: 871
Ratio Superior: 5.35
№290
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.73
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 5.35
№291
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.49
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 5.33
№292
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 5.32
№293
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.94
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.31
№294
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 82.59
TTFR rankings: 436
Ratio Superior: 5.28
№295
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.43
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 5.28
№296
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.91
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 5.25
№297
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 85.26
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 5.23
№298
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 41.92
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 5.22
№299
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.09
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 5.22
№300
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.18
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.21
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
