The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1301
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 300.1
TTFR rankings: 530
Ratio Superior: 1.77
№1302
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.52
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.77
№1303
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.26
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1304
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 221.99
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1305
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.95
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1306
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.47
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1307
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.39
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1308
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.35
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1309
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.68
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1310
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.33
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.76
№1311
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.06
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1312
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.95
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1313
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.95
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1314
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.42
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1315
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.85
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1316
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.63
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1317
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.25
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 1.75
№1318
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 33.82
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.74
№1319
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.76
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.74
№1320
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.64
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.74
№1321
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.95
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.74
№1322
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.42
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.74
№1323
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.81
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.74
№1324
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.14
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1325
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1326
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.45
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1327
Age: 20
Average rating: 360.92
TTFR rankings: 624
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1328
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.03
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1329
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.2
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1330
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.39
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.73
№1331
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 260.46
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 1.72
№1332
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.05
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.72
№1333
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.95
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.72
№1334
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.52
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.71
№1335
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.47
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.71
№1336
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.89
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.71
№1337
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107.04
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.71
№1338
Age: 20
Average rating: 360.92
TTFR rankings: 617
Ratio Superior: 1.71
№1339
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.95
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.71
№1340
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107.04
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.7
№1341
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.82
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1342
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 124.6
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1343
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.05
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1344
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.78
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1345
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.03
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1346
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.13
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1347
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.89
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1348
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.39
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.69
№1349
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.86
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.68
№1350
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.91
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.68
№1351
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 180.85
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 1.68
№1352
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.39
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1353
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 369.39
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1354
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.39
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1355
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.42
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1356
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.04
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1357
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.57
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1358
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.47
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1359
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.47
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1360
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 354.67
TTFR rankings: 590
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1361
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107.04
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1362
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.39
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1363
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.81
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1364
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.63
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1365
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.14
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1366
Age: 18
Average rating: 204.14
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1367
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.11
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1368
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.4
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1369
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.03
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1370
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.68
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1371
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.19
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1372
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.67
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1373
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.86
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1374
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 275.14
TTFR rankings: 452
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1375
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 275.14
TTFR rankings: 452
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1376
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1377
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1378
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.12
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1379
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 207.61
TTFR rankings: 339
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1380
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 305.81
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1381
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.42
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1382
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.81
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1383
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1384
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.6
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1385
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.61
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1386
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 207.61
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1387
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.35
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1388
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.3
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1389
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.06
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1390
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.4
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1391
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.03
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1392
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.63
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1393
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.55
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1394
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.81
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1395
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.6
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1396
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.58
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1397
Age: 9
Average rating: 12.5
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1398
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.9
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1399
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.76
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1400
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.39
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.6
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
