The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1301
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 248.71
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1302
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 17.21
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1303
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.78
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1304
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.79
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1305
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 49.47
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1306
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 57.81
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1307
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 223.13
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1308
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 63.99
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1309
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 347.35
TTFR rankings: 624
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1310
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.05
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1311
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 209.78
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1312
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.34
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1313
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.21
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1314
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.21
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1315
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1316
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1317
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 33.77
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1318
Age: 20
Average rating: 347.33
TTFR rankings: 617
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1319
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.05
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1320
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.46
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1321
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 262.82
TTFR rankings: 466
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1322
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 61.05
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1323
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.34
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1324
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.34
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1325
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1326
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 66.88
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1327
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.04
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1328
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.8
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1329
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 223.13
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1330
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 90.2
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1331
Age: 15
Average rating: 76.59
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1332
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 54.32
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1333
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.16
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1334
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 14.88
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1335
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 14.88
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1336
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 33.77
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1337
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.03
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1338
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 61.95
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1339
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 17.21
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1340
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.6
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1341
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 338.92
TTFR rankings: 590
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1342
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.18
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1343
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.16
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1344
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.28
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1345
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.28
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1346
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 354.3
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1347
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.05
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1348
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1349
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.58
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1350
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 54.32
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1351
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1352
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 20.25
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1353
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.38
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1354
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.69
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1355
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 262.82
TTFR rankings: 452
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1356
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 103.73
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1357
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.59
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1358
Age: 16
Average rating: 106.94
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1359
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.18
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1360
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 123.57
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1361
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.16
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1362
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.16
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1363
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.16
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1364
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.72
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1365
Age: 16
Average rating: 106.94
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1366
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 293.78
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1367
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.69
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1368
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 14.17
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1369
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 54.32
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1370
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.34
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1371
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.16
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1372
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.14
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1373
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1374
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 16.67
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1375
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 16.08
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1376
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 141.19
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1377
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.95
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1378
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 81.21
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1379
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.33
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1380
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.56
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1381
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.56
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1382
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 82.84
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1383
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 347.35
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1384
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 15.65
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1385
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.58
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1386
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.92
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1387
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 49.47
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1388
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.34
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1389
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 13.9
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1390
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.55
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1391
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 204.9
TTFR rankings: 339
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1392
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.16
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1393
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.04
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1394
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.38
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1395
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 204.9
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1396
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 183.97
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1397
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.53
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1398
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.16
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.64
1399
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 15.31
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1400
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 85.21
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.63

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников