The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1201
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.12
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1202
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.01
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1203
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.47
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1204
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.51
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1205
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.3
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1206
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.68
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1207
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.17
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1208
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.78
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1209
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 133.59
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1210
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.5
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1211
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1212
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.02
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 1.92
1213
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.82
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1214
Age: 18
Average rating: 204.13
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 1.91
1215
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.74
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1216
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.11
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1217
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.51
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1218
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 350.39
TTFR rankings: 665
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1219
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.73
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1220
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.5
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1221
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.41
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.9
1222
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 172.37
TTFR rankings: 326
Ratio Superior: 1.89
1223
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.86
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.89
1224
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.82
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.89
1225
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.02
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.89
1226
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.93
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.88
1227
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.82
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.88
1228
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.37
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.88
1229
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.36
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.88
1230
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.6
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 1.88
1231
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.35
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.88
1232
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.18
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1233
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1234
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.12
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1235
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.45
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1236
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 124.18
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1237
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.52
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1238
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.35
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1239
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.02
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1240
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.83
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 1.87
1241
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 222.03
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 1.86
1242
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.51
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.86
1243
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 133.59
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 1.86
1244
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.94
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.86
1245
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.49
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.85
1246
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.85
1247
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.92
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.85
1248
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.92
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.85
1249
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.65
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.85
1250
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.02
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1251
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1252
Age: 18
Average rating: 204.13
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1253
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.78
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1254
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.12
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1255
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.12
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1256
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.12
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1257
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 12.51
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1258
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.41
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1259
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.91
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1260
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.68
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1261
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.31
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1262
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 358.23
TTFR rankings: 657
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1263
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 193.26
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1264
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.15
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1265
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.15
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1266
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 305.85
TTFR rankings: 560
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1267
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.37
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1268
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.82
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1269
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 10.93
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1270
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 10.93
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1271
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.28
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1272
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.97
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1273
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1274
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 104.37
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1275
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.5
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1276
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.16
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1277
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.83
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1278
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.15
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1279
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.57
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1280
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.46
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1281
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.6
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1282
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1283
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 222.03
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1284
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.94
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1285
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.28
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1286
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 305.85
TTFR rankings: 551
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1287
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.01
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1288
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.35
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1289
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.86
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1290
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 172.37
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1291
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 88.21
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1292
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.2
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1293
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.65
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1294
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1295
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 210.53
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1296
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 12.88
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1297
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 155.13
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1298
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 193.26
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1299
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1300
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.5
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.77

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников