The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1101
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 81.76
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1102
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.77
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1103
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.03
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1104
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.88
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1105
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 11.33
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1106
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 53.44
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1107
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.1
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1108
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1109
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.49
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1110
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.84
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1111
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.94
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1112
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.79
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1113
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.13
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1114
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.09
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1115
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 187.14
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1116
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.92
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1117
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 87.65
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1118
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.17
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1119
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.17
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1120
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.17
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1121
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.79
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1122
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 295.67
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1123
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.65
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1124
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 92.68
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1125
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.66
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1126
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.11
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1127
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.32
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1128
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.7
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1129
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.77
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1130
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 290.71
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1131
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.37
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1132
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.33
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1133
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.92
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1134
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.74
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1135
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1136
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.37
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1137
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.63
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1138
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 50.73
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1139
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 133.83
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1140
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.68
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1141
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.68
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1142
Age: 14
Average rating: 57.37
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1143
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 354.7
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1144
Age: 16
Average rating: 109.61
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1145
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.92
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1146
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 295.67
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1147
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.79
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1148
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 60.65
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1149
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 143.32
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1150
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 32.65
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1151
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 346.32
TTFR rankings: 699
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1152
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 81.76
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1153
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 84.26
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1154
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 12.9
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1155
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 97.75
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1156
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 137.95
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1157
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.37
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1158
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.66
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1159
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.84
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1160
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 154.97
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1161
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 81.76
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1162
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.85
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1163
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.92
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 2
1164
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.48
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 2
1165
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.02
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2
1166
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.62
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1167
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 206.15
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1168
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.37
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1169
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.85
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1170
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.6
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1171
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.84
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1172
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.84
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1173
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.09
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1174
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 65.65
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1175
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.37
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1176
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.33
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1177
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.24
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1178
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.24
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1179
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1180
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.49
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1181
Age: 16
Average rating: 109.61
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1182
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.13
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1183
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 213.69
TTFR rankings: 418
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1184
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.47
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1185
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.45
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1186
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.92
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1187
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 51.85
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1188
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.82
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1189
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.39
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1190
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.85
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1191
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 58.73
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1192
Age: 17
Average rating: 147.35
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1193
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1194
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.53
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1195
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.41
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1196
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 29.94
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1197
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.09
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1198
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 181.02
TTFR rankings: 350
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1199
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 28.49
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1200
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.17
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.93

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников